This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards e6c78f9f40 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ad1fbe4ed3 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 79b85fbf8d 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dc8ac9323d 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 876b922dca 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a9597dcebd 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ae34925876 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards b60dd9ddbe 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards e7528eca83 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards d7cf16c94d 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c6a68cedb6 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 15100ec00d 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards aebcd45eed 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a5e47f3cb7 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards bb763fe532 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 275359cff9 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 71108bcb80 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4ddf75b6ba 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8ae9cfb849 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 6ab88166d8 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 3aeacacb11 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards c2e3c60cc8 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 4b9031a8f5 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 019b1613b5 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 3d85d2c259 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards ab19c7e1cb 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards e184154152 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 6b0b9af434 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f28ebef212 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5787e332c1 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 0b2a37331e 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 22d58e91f2 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards a6f6028a72 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards bb99f90d13 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 21e1dfda3c 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1f87e5934a 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 437985c642 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 2f9a312d80 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 7738cc62d3 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards c8234e7938 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 3a97506161 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f5550f2963 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7c7fdb6775 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b15e5b7d19 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 48601942a0 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 71535cb9f2 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards bc073d0244 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards fcd03f8bab 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards bcd162b768 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 6ddc30e854 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b2818ec559 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 9e64829349 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards f57a79cf18 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 6c132e5685 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 8f016516c4 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 14f57419bd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards e97439df36 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 633ad6aa00 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 49a0755e28 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 5243c34357 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4d4ac0eaf6 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards db915af061 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards d6e0fa2d9c 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 5642ebe8ce 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards cf1c0bf82e 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0a3859d7f8 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 43eaba75eb 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 60d64b2416 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2cf02bbb39 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b223d738c1 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards d3233e74a3 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 8d38ac6b2b 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards cec7058859 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards f8d7940785 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 4a98c4318e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards b530206c69 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards f56d3ce4ea 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 248fad2f44 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards de39e8c124 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f50c390c9e 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 0f49c45cab 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards e87217e202 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 30da94d567 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7c21bd6776 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 835865d691 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards c992041551 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 1b0c1982af 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 1a3822d561 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards c5f110c8fb 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards bc7d15a26a 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards a4e37ba5e4 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 6951c1226f 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ebf8730ec3 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards cdf4ad141d 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards e6f1877cc5 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 80967f2a04 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8fbf8c29e8 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 25af35842f 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 3d0cded9c8 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards beef0df57e 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 050b8248ad 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new ada2476f5c 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 868df80ed4 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 465188a9f9 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new bb9c8d205e 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 238f68ad3a 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b8115f0d58 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new c3a9ef7c35 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new cb32a5423f 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 35c9ef04db 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new eb6401a8a0 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new ddace66e51 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 1e73dc61cb 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 0c0375f28c 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new af0d199fd4 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 903d16f56b 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 1a35051bae 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 703b54cc1d 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4807e9efe2 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 6445cd6cca 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 39485ae3a2 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 0e4248ac9f 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new f08238e715 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 4a58e9603a 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5b9863ed25 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 527059dc8e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 06e20a25fc 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 4065b59710 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new a053bf3008 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 44d5ac7fc8 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 44bd68904e 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b21a87f76b 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3488a1eae5 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1bc2d1d6ff 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new f5a5c7d57f 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new e47664de23 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 23f5182501 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 4447f46150 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new e7a4239a08 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 3fcdc200f1 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new c30f593e7a 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new eb453f1468 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new d578553e3c 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 0d91a70654 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 8d6d29fc9e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 3ee86d2f13 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new d6ef3a664d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new c51b1ab7aa 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new e35f8d8296 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new ccc4b29db3 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d3e6a282fe 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 332a090ca9 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 45348a5619 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 242e3d8961 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new a1d8a5aba7 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 03c60d8958 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new f6c4365700 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new d75c34dd17 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new afc334b798 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b06ef2cc7e 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f3d29cdd90 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 70ab0910f4 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 050dd7cba1 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new ea4eb23670 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new e35fdd1467 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 30b2089bfe 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new c9154c768c 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 771725cb58 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new fdc074db4c 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 9dcd13843f 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 9dda6e286f 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 5aa13b68a4 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ecd54ec70f 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 244c694239 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new e805950bc8 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new fae1f05759 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 98227c4aed 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 6c2fdcc4bf 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new da5543f54e 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 5fe60151c9 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 64204eac96 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 0bd4156439 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new e4f5d448b0 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 443dcdca7f 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b1303fe1a0 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 77a4e0964e 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c2ec5e7005 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7b8dbc9f48 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 92fbf93521 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0fd6ed2f2e 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 639ac91331 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8477821afe 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 052fe47405 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 9544f3df51 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new f857f2e5c6 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8b8dbe5a2a 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new aaa59a1fb3 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f81d1e4ef4 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 49771208be 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d62c787515 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 9d77a2b749 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (e6c78f9f40) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2340 -> 2352 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2568 -> 2664 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27172 -> 28476 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17752 -> 17956 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90856 -> 91648 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70048 -> 70272 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8608 -> 7876 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233860 -> 235320 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185732 -> 185968 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211832 -> 216564 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179440 -> 180812 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 170 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 168 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4164 -> 4172 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 168 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17952 -> 17324 bytes .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 7 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 6 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 9 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3024 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3342 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 753024 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 768395 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28580 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3191 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3313 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 721755 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 724725 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28174 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3519 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 102 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4040 +- results_id | 2 +- 46 files changed, 1492287 insertions(+), 1554684 deletions(-)