This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards ddd22fc8e9 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 532825f2c7 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 921b2ae7c1 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards bac31224fb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ad33e19122 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 0daa35ae2e onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 20b9686c58 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5439ac4452 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c9f9d7da38 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d33dd93a74 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f2c58c69c9 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 253b55f7cf 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 85fb0f5f5d 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 16a9e69ffd 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2c61223e9d 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c7acaf7474 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 3bdf663bb5 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards b9a74b0cd7 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 9424b9823f 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 377476c937 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 6b24713cc5 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1d6cf37bb0 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e8fe17504f 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8d91dfd435 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 9abaa08d82 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 44c5b73771 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1f87f79148 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards dc281de649 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards fd9181b3f9 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 3cb2638b43 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards 5e58056f37 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards a6fead861b 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 705600d0f8 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards d01b893f28 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards a7541a65c3 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 43fe71d8b9 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 12efc149e6 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards de840f11b6 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ba47326a37 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards d4cf7073c1 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards ea3e9e8e31 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards cc5fc609fb 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards d77ff99b8e 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards cc4640cac8 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards af934a7e95 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 39cfd27bb4 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 81e9d54953 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 6ad58aea87 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards 5b76040ae3 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 2db90c0f01 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 54f4589c47 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 294387476c 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards d46048670e 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 2eed42d756 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 53d0a96c8e 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards f37c86800e 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards e58bdd7c0c 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards c7f951291c 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 76f6815023 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 530c907939 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 1800d5526c 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards fc9fa84120 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 6979b80826 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards badd6efd75 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 2a6779a3c9 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 24949a27a3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards b19c9ccc81 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards f1813e78f2 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 0855317ccd 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 478572988c 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 6d159b9b1b 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards ece4e463af 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards a84479f535 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 972762383b 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 113cda5df9 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 5149d7a33e 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards fb9b416fe1 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 00a90dd00f 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e298e01120 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards cb9994fa6f 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 61b32f2139 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards da9c24a0b2 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards ce5c5cf948 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 15c5ae9269 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 5d0eda2cba 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 19bb7ae4ce 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 28ac7a579a 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 8358eb5b12 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 11b7103e25 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 9da4dd7aaf 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards e94ceae434 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 63a23f2e2d 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 90611f7f0f 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards c13673b4ca 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards acae9ecfc8 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards d378186922 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards c0588bd02c 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards aeb31431da 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 3f0c467af0 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 84394f85d2 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 98eb5894a8 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 8550641616 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 96dbdcdf95 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 2970354d55 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 8645adb306 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 5f0bd3cc16 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 6afb3fcd5a 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new d6e1048b71 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 919e05b6be 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 49113db70e 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 17f18e2328 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new db94b98e8c 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new c8ac627266 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 87d61e7bda 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new dca545f0c4 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 874fa4d0ac 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new c791b79393 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new a899aad5c9 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 5130cbbf9d 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new f181a86be2 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 2e6bd0bf00 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new eb1668d49f 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 3c79af2274 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3d3365779b 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9c4f78a786 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new cead692e8c 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 4db3ce2f84 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c534717686 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 987e8a8708 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 61e5ba4a52 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new ad2ac5a36d 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 09b6a306a7 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1cb0a46b94 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 21688de8b0 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 5a49d16f05 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 95f2f0d7e1 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new f699b314ec 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 9778e6e469 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 0670a6d372 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new b70de7ea43 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new d800d57900 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 1e16f803f8 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 885c04efcf 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new fb9c24350a 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 44a5177aa5 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new c1a44698d5 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new c270e33a1a 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new d00ec21317 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 52a0c6bc94 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 85b801a70a 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c00efd491f 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new faa2dfeedb 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 996bc1adf2 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new a568b09128 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 0055feeff1 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new 46859493fd 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 85cc9921b5 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 3adf3be1c9 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new c757ac31a0 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 9dd066f0eb 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 1aac715008 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 2ae5df421b 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 2541f3a1cf 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 49e11cb8cb 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3ec24e5447 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new d1d764f1b5 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 1ce6b81926 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 279caa86fe 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new e3db8e4787 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3b0e39d3db 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new ccde9dd1cb 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 54a0d44504 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new f7e1dad4fe 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 84169d3bb8 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new be4be06af4 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fe8edb2873 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fb661cc69e 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 4b7e7e6e09 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3f3e34f637 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8e7d8123fa 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0fe0668f93 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 016a9e936d 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 68781814c8 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 5b79da68ce 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 60e2fed5a8 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new b3900b2b46 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b60984e8ef 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 853ead1893 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ea148f25c0 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a139fea18f 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b02f900783 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 87c45e029b onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new aa824a9cac onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 64b79ce3a8 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new eb9e9d4d0b onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b52e2c7844 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 805e883a3e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 87853727e3 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1e17e1b876 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 5a5f3bbee9 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new b8781675c2 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (ddd22fc8e9) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2280 -> 2324 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2660 -> 2600 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28068 -> 27196 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17900 -> 17744 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92744 -> 92552 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71992 -> 71736 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7896 -> 8568 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235256 -> 232768 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185952 -> 185232 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214500 -> 215524 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 180512 -> 181308 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 98 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 96 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 8084 -> 8120 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 185 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 3124 -> 6208 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 500 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 905 + jenkins/notify-init.log | 308 + jenkins/rewrite.log | 66 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 25 +- manifest.sh | 12 +- notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 39 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/notify-full.log | 601 - notify/notify-init.log | 189 - results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 255 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 165 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3403 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 774129 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 788148 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28764 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 60 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 201 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3327 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 747677 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 761638 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28430 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 72 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3513 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 255 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 255 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 95 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 255 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4406 +- results_id | 2 +- 54 files changed, 1547916 insertions(+), 1600240 deletions(-) create mode 100644 jenkins/notify-full.log create mode 100644 jenkins/notify-init.log delete mode 100644 notify/notify-full.log delete mode 100644 notify/notify-init.log