This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 9b2ae2a4d4 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e3eb9341e1 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 62b523cb96 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 2f70f4db52 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 11e7908e2f 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c0a44545fa 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 433341b7ce 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 52255685c7 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 5e0f52e6ac 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 93437a773d 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 069acab427 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 17f2fbda04 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c09b3a2cf2 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b93ebb0952 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 13f051bd31 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 6e5be654d7 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards 04e609f734 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards 868757f1a8 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards bcd444f14d 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 9bdeb76d59 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 700950d4e4 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2e494686fa 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 0e8e35d094 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards a5eb10f447 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 021b919612 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 833061a2f2 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards c557bbcd44 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards e8fab53e0f 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards a19f8a8b4d 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards c1a4b79cd6 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 1392e8717d 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 97fc7b8642 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 33b9853cf0 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards fc4ffa5574 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2ebe141a43 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f874ce5376 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 092023f368 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 38fc93b847 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 79ecadd5a2 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards c4fdb2e694 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 00dd2d2d97 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 4107aee454 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 51bbd76af6 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 740ba4c21d 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 9a5652a5c2 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 73619b0bdb 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 526eabfe58 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 0d83996efb 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 42150a82dd 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a4aea57664 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 9482107153 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards e860d5f8a5 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 70844ecd27 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 2c3eaddeb4 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards ee9d4a9557 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 2e004b0a89 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 63a6550966 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards c354691446 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards 2ce7f69c2d 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 4e0afd9397 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards df12255860 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 49a80c3959 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 853c1e2519 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards d693c97387 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 61e2f2d308 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 21f134bccd 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 0328ded914 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ecb571bbda 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 11d288ca43 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards b3cba2c52c 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 6225804575 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 3bf23366a0 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b1b65f825d 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9538a3d8c8 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9b44b2348d 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 3bc818f86a 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards d96eea92c6 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 214359e392 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 8bd43bc694 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 8ecbb2a873 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b688991697 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 6f2c516add 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 76405779b7 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 423d2c6c15 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1ad50a1f60 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 03e8fe2079 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 20e5cd5a62 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 87f28615c6 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards 26066dad13 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards acc722933e 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d024d45070 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9bd1b5d2fa 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] discards 2ff1009d7e 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] discards 61b03c85e5 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] discards 67d6f49fe7 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] discards 598972bb47 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 0f7047dc80 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] discards a47be2dacd 3: onsuccess: #456: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 7624 [...] discards c34aee184a 2: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits discards 47ed6edb94 1: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards aba81ad033 0: init: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new c111a6428a 0: init: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new fbe30cc995 1: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 224858c379 2: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits new 1fa702de75 3: onsuccess: #456: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 7624 [...] new f04c2b9e83 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] new ca2d81bab4 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] new eece09a93f 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] new 1c76801f03 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] new b2c8aee081 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] new b6d95798e5 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] new f7b8098a33 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new fa2842beaa 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0adaed498c 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b789cb56c2 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new 0dca11df5d 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 0114860823 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 9a07161579 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new ec241cdb27 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c363aad6da 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new cb4ec70397 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 2b3210e2be 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 25c858e389 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7789ffcd8f 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 1b081001dd 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 0202f55cc2 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new a21575536e 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new e998620344 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 00f3e21b04 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6034010f55 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 774674c86e 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 79f53e7afe 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new b9ce5962d7 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 639ddfec3d 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 0e58e71b02 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 525510be38 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1ffb01273c 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ea071f6474 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 07cdf995fb 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new 5f0c4c6a6b 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new a741cba7c8 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new bbe2a3e441 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 115a9e61f1 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new fcef2e8b1b 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new 22279178ac 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 04d20d25bb 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 3c97e28ca7 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new aa03390781 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 71f387dc2f 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 6535b2d60f 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new d8dcceda70 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new b9085b29ef 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 2b099790fa 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 595d634edd 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c7a0553b82 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new eb4ec57898 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new f0c4949215 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new 1ff1641a0f 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 375ed909bb 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new c7452bfa02 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 92a12a99f4 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new a3ddfa1888 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new c440492583 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 5913445b08 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 0a0d159baf 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 938c94d82b 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6456299b8d 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5710a9b5ea 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 948a4eb04d 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 60e489aa53 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 4bc6bb67ee 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3e2626b78f 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new bf689fb024 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new c682fa1662 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 07bf6f83c4 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 02a6393c5a 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new ee12b4968f 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 37003eb65b 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new e012687aa8 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 326231310b 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new e692446c9f 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new f0c38e519b 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 3b4dfb11b0 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 7bf0ec12cf 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 6e8946413d 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new b8930e30bd 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 83ae3b086f 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new bd7cc4b2f8 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new fc0a266d14 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a6df1638f3 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f90b883597 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4304b7f5b2 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new fcc5a62df0 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new bc9f931a90 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 373707bfb0 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 0efe471d2e 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 23ff8c03b7 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 34d584dd7a 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new b36f00cb8e 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 6ac985654d 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 93b7b29b63 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1a7fc9b5ce 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ac08ec2b6c 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (9b2ae2a4d4) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2056 -> 2040 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2560 -> 2420 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27832 -> 26804 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90020 -> 89828 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7600 -> 8396 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234480 -> 233648 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214984 -> 211128 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 148 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 146 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4336 -> 4320 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 160 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 16376 -> 17936 bytes .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 12 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 6 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 1 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 42 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 237 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2812 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 760016 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 762516 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30624 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 908 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3091 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3363 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 757305 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 771287 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30556 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1226 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 149 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3324 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4018 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 5 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3103 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3388 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 756574 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 767447 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30092 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 1190 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3093 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3363 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 757305 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 771287 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30556 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1226 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 149 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3450 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4372 +- results_id | 2 +- 62 files changed, 3123123 insertions(+), 3146851 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff