This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards e2e8f07cf6 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d244ede14b onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 048339d060 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ff0b26a5c4 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6846d072b1 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e30c2c8b1c 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c64b2b67fd 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ac6afeb41b 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0497860791 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 2608bec014 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards bf98989084 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 252db9fe20 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5a24693cac 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c45ca89733 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e8324d979f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2b105530e4 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 51dd1e6d9c 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4818780fd2 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 1186b413d5 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 0540e61530 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] discards 6fc7ca058e 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 23a76acc2c 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e33e693fb6 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 217b8c1b96 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] discards b2610ed95b 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] discards abd6b0138e 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2434ee67e8 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 6d6274f651 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] discards a3c78568b0 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 06f8b3d8e3 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 92bf7ab20e 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] discards 4cd39379e5 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 2e5d039ab7 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] discards 9a59c64a79 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 02e91484c6 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards ae79ddd6b5 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a8f83c6241 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dcf7722647 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b584c45ec1 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 18a1ba9617 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 3c1cf216d3 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards db7444801a 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ca0eb4b786 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 90ce7950c4 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 73bd812934 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] discards 49275c679e 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b94d874523 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 81bf8f26d1 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 05e03e9729 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 81bdb4d7a6 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f4315ddff1 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 30079757d4 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 5d253ac828 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards acce406ad6 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards b3fcb33fbf 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 6f33bed5f1 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 34441a62b4 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 0241e5fc0a 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] discards 38d4a22727 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards eb89fcbdca 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards d513e487fc 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 3c5cda219a 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards 652c78ba80 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards bfbe6d4c84 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 2d4762c626 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 2792f007cd 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] discards e725d2ff98 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards e3fd203dc5 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 941c9c9e1a 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] discards ef28c565f7 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards f14234868b 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 6a509016bd 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 161a577d17 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c1799a0f4b 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f576406a27 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 51b390d66a 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c367c35258 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d793297434 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards cb615c6bf8 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a59e036482 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2556e19ef5 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 562b47ecb4 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards ab2043042d 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 76deceb852 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 228cfb59c1 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 56f3b22193 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 3bac70b651 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards fa4fee82ae 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 930bd6a9d1 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] discards c5a0873d46 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 894ce480a2 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 55c06b09c9 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1e0705e69b 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 508557801c 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] discards 8369cfcab0 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 70507e6008 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards fb1784b906 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f6a110d505 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e29cb4834d 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards b836f7024f 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new eafe47c16b 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 3ad3e11386 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new a5617bda16 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3930295682 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7cefcbc356 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 74a40c21ea 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 6c2f4f4b24 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] new 143e8d6871 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bf4dfe12cd 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bc69d68e37 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e4114da77a 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 1acdc3886c 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] new f73c9384a9 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new d4dc85cb7c 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d0fc1b9ec6 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 0225200786 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 8e9b7cb710 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a29e1ebcb9 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new cd0b396313 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 8680a37104 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new 7797882d66 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new dceec6e798 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d8fa4920e2 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c5995af9f2 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3c9259f1b9 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8452496555 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2e5531944b 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ed0356d349 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6dbe4bffd1 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new f96dfd45c6 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 96c0ab1419 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 1fba40e688 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] new 82bd67c3a5 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new d992832d18 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 49f43a1c98 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] new 039e786919 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new f5f558d169 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 8c2a8cab23 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new 91fb1fcfc7 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new 23af4cc09f 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 874493798f 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 1a5ac7aafb 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 56263f1ecf 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] new 4283c2db92 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new b1a56944ce 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new cb5c3c8193 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 731af1a1bd 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new a8bcb07c66 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 376a693ed5 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 5fb82ea41f 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 25ce524907 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 50f2e7e2d9 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 96ce29ddeb 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b56c7476c9 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new b9d3a7cdc5 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c80cf75797 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] new 3ece342a2d 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 29caf325ce 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 6e179dc402 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e0b83fdf77 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 9aff12352f 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new a28aa974ee 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new ad6732f0da 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0192edf7eb 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fe8c7e345e 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6aafdb16de 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 26642e5fb4 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 4bdc5690ba 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] new 94801afc0b 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 98c3d0dc5f 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] new 9209a9c123 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 46347789e2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new cb5ec81618 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] new 0ad091fbdb 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 6886836cac 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 515a88223e 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] new a4e6436d11 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] new a5aa3b5858 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 87da680f61 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 984117eba9 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 9ea334e590 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] new 781e95ab6e 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 87031e28f4 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4f6d44a236 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 28775ac154 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 96c8ec6cfd 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a50a7d0347 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new bd7d583f51 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e17b7fe02e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b909c40a31 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 77c43a9502 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new cc1a10b139 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 6e75aff8fa 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5c45bfc3b2 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8915e7d616 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6eae9041d4 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 2f3c15ba61 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a59b36cddf onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 6708975eb2 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 07d082b425 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f48dfe0bd9 onsuccess: #84: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (e2e8f07cf6) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2284 -> 2288 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2700 -> 2696 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27860 -> 28312 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17744 -> 17828 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91576 -> 93008 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71492 -> 71780 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8604 -> 7816 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234160 -> 235804 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 186044 -> 186344 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214640 -> 216436 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 180932 -> 180880 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 100 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 98 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 7904 -> 8152 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 3776 -> 3744 bytes git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 6 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 10 +- manifest.sh | 10 +- notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 48 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/notify-full.log | 336 +- notify/notify-init.log | 112 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 34 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 186 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 709424 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 722951 ++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20611 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 827 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 48 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 200 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 707638 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 709515 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20553 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 867 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 212 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 30 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4208 +- results_id | 2 +- 49 files changed, 1448265 insertions(+), 1450161 deletions(-)