This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 1f563ac7e2e onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 084845dba4a onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 515d0e95465 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards b645ecc5995 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 60a4de6880e onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 7e31f45c0a1 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards e5efcfd3110 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 920ce5159b6 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 30654ccd500 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 46d253af7a9 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards fe2ec047b1a 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 000d0808547 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 431efe15de6 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards f93e4c40d5e 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 861302f5d90 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 8fae917101a 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d0227960e14 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards eff13e6c0aa 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d91f11f72fb 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 413466d39b6 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards aef30f8045b 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 77d61a9c98e 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] discards 42dd8becd01 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] discards 44a4fd40bde 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 1c7ed8170a8 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] discards 80ba6d09735 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 2297685c92d 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ce8c4d82503 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 16ca4cc2442 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 63f36460c96 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 7d4b2606485 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards b3593d8b8dd 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d271ac3731a 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a7f341ac7cf 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards 724ec8f3a4e 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 0aa6a7d4f78 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards c163d1a6d37 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 67ad0599a22 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 58e55fd8711 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 506aa7b1736 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 5139dff8dc0 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] discards f74a03615fc 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 4f3b14f319d 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] discards b8f8aeb2e7c 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards bf4437dc450 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1f125c53f6c 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 42099a448e6 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards bd631f69c06 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] discards 6a68babd3c6 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 26f6d9ff50e 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 956a4995d30 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] discards 80ce776f939 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards fdf4f476bd5 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 769bfd04efd 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 281eaa107e2 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 1bd885c9e0b 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards c332ebd325d 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards a740d459f74 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 37b00a8d8af 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] discards 2e1922c30e6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 1180106b6ae 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards e9e4bed71ce 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] discards 2badbc3911d 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 72e23f1bf8e 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 3ff67b39c77 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 08f6b20b25c 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] discards 472164341b2 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] discards 8be7c060fd0 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 1fa50cc4482 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 0bc1e5baeac 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 49d9816e8ca 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 2e4a210e775 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dfb39cf2017 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5a1765e2774 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 81002f03c3b 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 8e3238a9391 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 13552f064c3 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 882ca7ca794 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 4950493eb00 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards a78f4c1f1ee 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards a19af40aa42 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 28c100bd173 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] discards 00da375c0fb 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 95d088a3455 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 764c6090e7f 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] discards 1e30b008285 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards e00d8e4ec29 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 306524c2737 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] discards 54fd608c10c 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] discards 339a97256d5 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 6c95456ccdb 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] discards f26f4fe6a57 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] discards 20d6e9ad714 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 77241fd44c1 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] discards bc08c721c04 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 6d38cac0e1c 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards f8549222e63 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 6744db4ed3d 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards ddd01a269e7 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 129d27c04b9 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new c89a0f06f9a 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 5fa75cfdcef 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 74958b27308 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 0785ae4e1ba 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 97ce946bf5a 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 40d7a6878d1 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 9750ed32a63 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] new f5fbbd79401 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new ab6bcc71570 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] new caa62416327 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] new 62034e44ecb 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new a7e271b34f1 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] new 71793055bef 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] new 7ff8c40bf0f 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 287b144257c 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 81eebbca8d9 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] new 569bc62059d 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 1387d6e5123 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2393d61a6be 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] new fc2acf3c5db 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6179e16f911 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 14e1d0c3da3 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new bd513392acb 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new b8e5b5f3872 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 232e625ba7a 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 33fe679d8ea 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 1dbf203ed14 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 24ae8b8ec7f 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b09e78da74d 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fe2c9a5f70e 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 0854ba1dd29 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new 2404d493ffa 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 017427fbd50 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new d8ca3b8573f 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] new 76fccd27c86 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] new 31d2e378e57 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 67f0407d01e 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 81226df5ae3 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 35b4a4e4323 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] new f4d645e9a22 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 87101d90024 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 1e8d0080f1b 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] new 0de7600c00c 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b9ab7cab9c2 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 1e5247d2f7c 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new eb7004ee803 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 5e110534411 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1ddbe8c1484 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 340c0be6420 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 0296b631c28 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] new 875e3d5820b 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 14ba5ca988e 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 8f92914d9d6 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] new 350c47b0b31 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 8bdbee86cb0 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 79ac989de6f 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d63eb9bc0dc 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 19d759804c5 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] new 2a303722178 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 0b21bb553ce 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] new feb624a5596 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 179cab5efa2 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new b39c7f9385f 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new dde7b30f244 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 9e5ace8b818 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 39c00e57fc1 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new e005b86ed2c 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 89d995a2d7b 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 16bce2a114c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4ee8f1c3b36 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new c5c9b2d78a7 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 30d757150c0 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new d8e369ab082 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 7d8621f541f 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b3b076f1901 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 3335827005f 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] new c5137af9967 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new d8c4790cfd1 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] new d218f681f4c 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] new edb1d979734 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new a9d8128b22b 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 2b05082cc04 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 403e4ca4faa 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new dd2f81e2afb 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new cff0e20d278 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 9a4742bcf13 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new f4064140e16 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 51e6700da43 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 7b3d0f6e614 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new b2d25b132e6 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new d145c35b1f6 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 613e1096770 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new cd54c1770f3 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new af1259912d2 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new abaa0fdd4e1 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 7f111b021dc onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 203c4aaf0c9 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new cc0de126388 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new c01cf183edc onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 93989629c3f onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new a43da826204 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (1f563ac7e2e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2228 -> 2268 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2660 -> 2656 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28184 -> 28628 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17884 -> 17832 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92348 -> 91804 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71988 -> 71620 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7852 -> 8604 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235468 -> 233248 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 186452 -> 185224 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214384 -> 214056 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 180048 -> 181176 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 122 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 120 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 7712 -> 7512 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 189 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 4176 -> 3224 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 116 + git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 6 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 12 +- manifest.sh | 12 +- notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 54 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/notify-full.log | 306 +- notify/notify-init.log | 90 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 176 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 203 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 184 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 4650 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 770462 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 780651 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28251 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 67 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 184 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 4629 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 792056 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 803265 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28744 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 72 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 4642 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 203 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 203 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 163 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 203 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4078 +- results_id | 2 +- 53 files changed, 1634488 insertions(+), 1589709 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff