This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
omits a4212baf onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 48b6e098 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits a608e9fe onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits d7d7de40 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 40098a2f onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 169136dd onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 93e95bcc onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 8b711218 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 0f257663 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits a168399c 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 2f856d80 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 4b1d1c45 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 1d17a7a1 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 9808ac67 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits f51a1e7a 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 27148e37 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 4505e801 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 2562fdc5 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits bc464c6f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 32262745 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits a0a7cb2e 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 6eed8e59 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 8d0426ae 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] omits 0d6233da 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] omits d0331fbb 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 92d73670 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] omits da6af0bb 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] omits c571f6ae 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] omits b648a8a9 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] omits 996c7c0e 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits b7a9c81e 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] omits de2d1537 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] omits 8b942ff3 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] omits 31ba88d2 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits d39c8bc0 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits omits b8b48d3c 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] omits 463df96d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] omits d6a734c7 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits omits 4f717d56 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits omits ae0b60be 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 6c08de7f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 5a6c682a 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits f845ba76 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] omits d7fd5036 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 49e942c1 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] omits 978c3662 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 1da38f6e 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] omits 144d26ac 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 23af69e9 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] omits 878bd039 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 496b2554 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 9853a8a3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits d909b75a 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits f914eeda 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits b7473f79 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 910238dd 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] omits 1e48aee3 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 631fd4bb 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 3a0ba3d9 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] omits 2f50df6f 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 643e9161 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 0c294973 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] omits 3e5d1154 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] omits 6fbf5ecd 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] omits 3bbc1510 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 92b85b13 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] omits e2c654dc 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] omits 52186424 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 464f7b5a 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] omits f790d0b8 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits omits e004af3c 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] omits fcff092e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits omits 709a49db 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] omits 628a042f 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] omits 0384e536 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 0ba70631 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] omits aa3feeaf 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 5ba5697a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 9e906e0d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 4685a701 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 8e25340d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits f04e8f72 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 86d98d63 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 2b64e295 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] omits 001faeb0 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] omits 6911e929 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits omits 0f638065 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits omits e926e690 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] omits d6c1eb06 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] omits 7b61d759 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits omits 94287577 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits db8e1dc5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits e2cb4a44 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] omits 5293fc68 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits omits d8a86065 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits d8fb959e 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 1b493736 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 9c9cd515 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] omits 1022fa23 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] omits 234f2ba8 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 3777094e 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits b032e345 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits a7abd487 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] omits eafe47c1 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] omits a9927267 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 7fb2a2be 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] omits 90b6002e 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] omits 9c5d69a4 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] omits 8db4b1a7 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] omits a0ae1e25 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] omits fb141191 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] omits a4c83953 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 omits 3a5c4772 1: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 omits 6bc5df15 0: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 406dd14d Initial empty repository new 560b70c8 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new e096d575 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] new e77aaa39 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new a3c1e163 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new c7976089 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 1ccb7df3 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new a73fa17d 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new 2380b1bd 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7bf02121 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f7c4a454 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 0a1aa239 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 53f7b220 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2aa0a413 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3638888a 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 9a25538f 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new d33a7adf 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d66dba71 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6c8af3dc 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 99cc4dcd 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new e10f8d7a 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new dcb73763 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new d6606863 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new e50cfc4b 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 855745eb 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new ebf651d6 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new fbbe1182 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new f6d8fc1d 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new d655eb8b 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new accc08fd 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 4703f067 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e9882dbb 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 71b1fa54 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6c04ea0e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 83f64608 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new a2f0d885 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 891013ac 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new b2b4be98 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 0c166a70 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 35624058 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new dfba0363 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 81e99935 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new d9ff6861 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 099544a4 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new f44b75e0 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 6eee2224 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 83c129bf 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new ed17333e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 30af28eb 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 399bc00b 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 8d773d89 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 52efd88e 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new b425e961 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new cf2b5742 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6febda01 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 5dc77920 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 877e37bc 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3a26ef3c 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new ddd09606 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 053f7d63 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b4b7da5f 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new aedf61d0 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 31095dbd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 622bef29 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new bdfb6b70 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 75d7fb2b 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2f3b81cb 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new bbf63e90 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b2252c0c 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new f4cfca2d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 4e486b6f 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 78034b90 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 09555b8d 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c7a23b3e 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new d53afe32 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new b5b30223 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 89fa04d8 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 9ca0cdc2 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new c6abd7a7 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new ce01daf6 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 29555a58 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new e5e31211 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 62f7788d 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 00417477 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 06f195bc 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 39af09b7 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new e3facb9d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new f698f0c1 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new a6853ea8 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new cc421fa0 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new d50a0210 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 6f8cf020 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8f1a928c 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 685d4212 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3eac1509 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b4a20fcf 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 593967d1 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6df36c13 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2754778d 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 80b21e55 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 29e70fe7 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b26194c1 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 99d0527b 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 47877921 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 36785491 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 928a47d1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 722873b1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new db33bb8f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cf5eec60 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new dcad3538 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 28b10c3b onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new de3d0990 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 11fceb46 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a4212baf) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 113 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: