This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 9b8ef082be 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 0be63c1779 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards edd1a1de70 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards c13c1af444 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0057969d5e 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 6e8d457b9b 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 41bc5afd2b 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards d34bb234d5 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f6d43a9bdc 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 393bc818a8 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 49d9d6c714 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 8487cc1e8d 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 3cdd037bb9 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6a8af485cd 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f9fa68c2cc 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards deab17a253 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 86efb7b647 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 85d42411f7 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 70b48ed3fe 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 41b7b9e05c 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 33a602bef7 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ef65c7527d 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 44da2c2e12 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3a0cf8b153 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards cd4bc4dfd2 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards ddc80d5122 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards 6d1e0e36bf 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards cd22e5a3e0 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 49b8bbe92c 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 3bff1ab72b 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 964088338e 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards ba69e6a4bf 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards f3818e3954 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2b9329b007 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards c6076718e5 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards ac5b70c725 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 0ca9669d37 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 7035d82c03 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 4bcb3bfa30 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 7f1e2485bd 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards dbcf229ee4 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f9198b18a0 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 6ae80d7d85 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 3999ec86ad 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f6d6a05bee 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4067e9ad47 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9ab511947c 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 34c1a3102b 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards a8b1a605d3 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 6a140ca42b 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 4591cd3639 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 0c885081bd 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 832775a6e4 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 16eb6f280d 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 2da09a583f 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 597f84c45e 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards ffb761e579 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 65e711bcd0 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ff48651ff8 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards ce8469d9f8 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards b1f792ece3 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards ad4172e42a 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 3a9082dc82 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards d09f972fd0 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 387683dcee 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b8b57ccc4a 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 04aa42e435 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards 51072f2e33 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 7823f342a6 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards bfd8b1df6e 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 87bf440b7b 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 98207e5573 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 23f22d613e 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards eb5f25aa72 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 40ceeaedd8 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 56fbb9226c 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8e7360e854 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8e7e9bf7bd 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards e3c959755d 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3eeb65a56b 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 3653c1e0bd 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 16147becf1 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a0b0417fc3 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 98f2be9d91 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards f5725d2d26 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 66091de8f8 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards ddeec3157a 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 0beae7a586 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards c52d9b5a79 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 961ca40fe5 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 580674d204 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 1f8e17570e 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 7a01eef852 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7b9de0cea2 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards d878d1cbae 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards f77b6090d8 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 1456a07dad 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards 219dbd62c1 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 70dc75d3a5 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a8b13d4857 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards da82c3fa9f 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] new c90230d3c0 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] new 64bc705501 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 02a669cff8 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new de2fe97166 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2d20266627 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new daf87ffc0d 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new cdafec60be 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 60c9de0579 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 9fd30e8d2a 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7ecb2ba754 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 297390e7d0 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 1881505069 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new a4e2fe2a4f 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5d261ad7bb 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new eb97912416 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 96946562e0 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new f23d29a9dc 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 1bbab2dbe6 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 7943922642 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 44c87eb249 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8958dbd379 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 787719c535 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new f18f739bdb 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 222b85c28f 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 14d2ad896e 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 82487e3e3a 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 959d331ba7 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 105ad38d99 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 98a063b82c 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new 0103b51e1f 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new d00c0889eb 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 62b8d39524 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new fe59529e41 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 7b8224ce23 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new 1c4902cf04 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 55babbaa11 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new c3786e43f1 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d327efe445 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new cf65bcf8c3 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 28707cc8f8 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new ddfddae540 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 755508793e 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 964f1359f0 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 0b85ac9ba6 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new cb58be620d 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 757acbac8d 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new c30cf197d3 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new a378ce0e17 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e61b218084 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 8516a1fd0d 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 1dbc259189 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new d34d9dbcd0 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 2ae19d9b60 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new ce289ef358 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 0107657b63 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ceecda67db 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8580e6c66e 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3b8b7094f3 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f3b93a5b4d 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new fba06ab820 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new dee3d450ad 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e55c7aa6f5 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new f94c08c026 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 4687720128 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 9e044f57a1 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new ee4639a1bb 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new b53015dec1 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new a42def6da1 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new d6bc06313d 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ee372a34d7 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new f87369db52 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 8b98aa714c 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 21a4341a2d 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 7a4a6318fc 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new c18690cf5e 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 3a938d4425 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 1fe590302a 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 7534281779 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 47ac979cc7 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 435095c92a 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d9edc2a77c 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 43a875393b 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 58e471e405 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 5fdcaf182a 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6bfd10ac68 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 4904bcd5b6 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 451f4c8212 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 5ef5e8f92e 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9fa62ac809 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a1e36f4a65 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 257f4aef02 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2ff5a2d69a 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b36d9b2312 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 45bda8803c 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ecf275bc56 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 9ea03d2b35 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 0e04cdb130 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1536daa231 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ad0db8002f 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 0c7b57eecc 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 39f1ba398b 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new dbcf180063 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (9b8ef082be) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2220 -> 1948 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2464 -> 2420 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27924 -> 27148 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90976 -> 90568 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8508 -> 8568 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 232932 -> 233528 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212768 -> 211872 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 134 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 132 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4136 -> 4204 bytes 10-check_regression/429.mcf.symbols-regression | 1 - 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 159 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 20812 -> 19512 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 + 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 2 - 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 4 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 6 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 6 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 9 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 9 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 7 +- 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 3 - 10-check_regression/symbol.regression | 1 - 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect | 3 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- mail/check-regression-status.txt | 2 +- mail/exe.improvement | 1 + mail/exe.regression | 2 - mail/symbol.regression | 1 - manifest.sh | 14 +- results | 3 - results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 235 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 26 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 26 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2707 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3315 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 6204 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 677010 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28616 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 502 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 151 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3223 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3612 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 9 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3036 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3342 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 76055 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 639168 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 18782 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 554 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2703 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3315 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 6204 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 677010 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28616 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 502 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 151 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3439 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3896 +- results_id | 2 +- 70 files changed, 1054954 insertions(+), 1139417 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/429.mcf.symbols-regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/symbol.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect create mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 mail/exe.regression delete mode 100644 mail/symbol.regression