This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards d8bb15c3e4 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards ca160ab566 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 55607dbbcc 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 63d0ff73be 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 1a22f15489 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d024a5cfca 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7ea774731d 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 817ac7fa0d 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 2921b2b181 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards 1507156148 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] discards f70938736f 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards bf809c54b2 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] discards 1c8c86c7e5 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 6e57e42e98 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] discards 42036d6c15 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards c9318aafd1 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dab2d61bee 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards b7cd3c99a0 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] discards f53d9c9885 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards 90a45285a8 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards bce68d04b6 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7c9ae91d3a 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e3ffdf48e0 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 34ca2621f8 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 435ee86445 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0f493500a6 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d2e9795d96 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1aa9607076 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7418acfb8f 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 09496c8a2e 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 54c66f7539 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e755f1dd8c 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5390b7527a 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 716942381a 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8700cb7830 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards eeabd0b98c 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cf9cdfcaf8 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f868bcdcef 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 59799aed41 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 367d1fd68d 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d183acd7ad 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] discards 9914cd9263 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards afa76faa8d 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a317c9e92c 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 63f7ca3dfb 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards dd7b21941d 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3ca6eef042 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ea75473909 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards e7799b0c40 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] discards 4851cf44d4 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards b1af60ad42 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] discards 15d2d6967c 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits discards 39b7607535 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 94d0f1e53a 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits discards c6bde247de 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 62d45fe4e0 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards de30190608 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 71e5b1e8fe 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 444a9f8a20 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0deb601fe6 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] discards f2aca9f9a9 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards fcf6b1f461 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 3313b36f10 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 690a991319 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a495635375 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 75bd2fb446 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ab207b837b 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bb4a3eb935 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f25e0dedce 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4ff3ca35ac 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8b8f602079 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0e0f1369da 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 02beecd73f 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards d3600718c7 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bd96819694 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards 5313ee59fd 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards e507665527 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards 33a0e6aaf6 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] discards 85f0a51cd0 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 7d91b1c080 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 0dfe6e0feb 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f3f6d14d4a 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards b06395509a 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards ac383d35d7 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards 30196ac812 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] discards 75c8a3ed61 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits discards f5501e8082 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards dbf99959d8 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] discards 997b1b1f6c 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits discards 82c60dd441 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] discards 8b3625bf6a 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards 6127bd5006 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards f75d292edf 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] discards f603e0c94c 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] discards c207839fef 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards a99ea0bad4 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 8444ddcda6 6: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 8707df8251 5: reset: gcc-e5a9d60317852a7323e46109fa366e630b8b5bae: 1 discards 273053a178 4: update: binutils-linux-glibc: 1 discards 82c2debaa0 3: reset: gcc-d2a898666609452ef79a14feae1cadc3538e4b45: 1 discards ce50df3009 2: update: binutils-linux-glibc: 1 new ea3f653ea0 2: update: binutils-linux-glibc: 1 new baa05c9b46 3: reset: gcc-d2a898666609452ef79a14feae1cadc3538e4b45: 1 new 25ef92a182 4: update: binutils-linux-glibc: 1 new 15abe25e84 5: reset: gcc-e5a9d60317852a7323e46109fa366e630b8b5bae: 1 new 2771724091 6: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 51c0fd3814 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 7b9c7ae02b 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 0f0f12e082 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new 7e0f09ec59 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] new 64cef13410 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new ae70eab504 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new cf671733a9 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] new b16c82dbf6 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits new 674138fcde 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] new 6463c943d9 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new f3729b5b2b 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new c76b06a09b 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] new 1868ebef52 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new 7dea13611d 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new 82312ca31e 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new 6734827f4d 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 69fa8951d8 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c7820c62d7 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 7226eb8870 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] new 122ba787b2 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new 88429c2f50 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new c71cecff5b 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new 9b2a72a5e8 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d19d16dd6a 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new d5258ea565 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 506ff1bf86 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8d11d70c26 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new abf3104f8f 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b9d736b555 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 08abc8081d 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ec14f5f27b 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c51787b8ad 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ae7a85d6d1 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4aec857066 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 24ea9210c1 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 691b1c7759 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new c2ce66c56f 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] new 2905474491 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7c47b51831 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new bce0244b6d 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new a27191b4b1 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6f64533068 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 5b84f2d1af 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits new 34f439ce54 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ff814ff2ad 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits new 147df2d5ff 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] new 80f34d40b2 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new 3521f98969 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] new 4d96b5b8e5 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new 624bbe553a 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new fefe1fd6e6 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9d73a4ce86 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4bb4c9f39b 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d357b3cbcf 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a241f25cd7 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 43b0c9f12d 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] new 34cb184913 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b53c85a312 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new fe7d14ff12 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 07af2250c5 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0ee8666332 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4be23d5f14 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0650684015 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 08afab2589 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ddb6e8eda9 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 21e56d1fe4 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5761d43e54 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b5046e1b28 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new df884a1c89 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f5351b6992 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 811a3fa1d2 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 26c437b6d5 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 77a437f3f6 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5bb7ee6816 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new aee06c1e3b 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 99180b8807 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 84de5f73c5 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 71c9ffac20 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new 2949521d1c 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] new 623b612c13 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new 333c7af45c 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d21954fc3c 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new adf7dd9af3 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] new 49903a619c 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 65080802af 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] new b27f5dbd93 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new 27c31fbfa7 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] new 7c4389ea31 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new 709fbc83b2 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 4e86655af0 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e9ced45686 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7988d862d6 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 85907a080f 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 202989a025 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8706e7b292 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 5912edd5df 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 3dfca66043 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (d8bb15c3e4) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2036 -> 2176 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2488 -> 2412 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27816 -> 27776 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 71912 -> 72140 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8448 -> 8436 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 242352 -> 241896 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 177400 -> 176876 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 97 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 95 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4120 -> 4168 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 42 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 10692 -> 6616 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 - 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 1 - 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../error_code-1} | 0 .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 4 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 8 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 9 - .../output-bmk-results/extra-bisect-params | 1 + 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 1 - 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect | 3 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- mail/check-regression-status.txt | 2 +- mail/exe.improvement | 1 - mail/exe.regression | 1 - manifest.sh | 16 +- results | 1 - results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 65 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 2 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 139 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 946799 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 116 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 5 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 103 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 150 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 101 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 101 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2144 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 79 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 31 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 30 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 159 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 9993 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 485217 ++++----- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 16 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 139 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 946799 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 116 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 5 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 113 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 176 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 109 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 109 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3832 +- results_id | 2 +- 63 files changed, 1200700 insertions(+), 1196344 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression rename 10-check_regression/{trigger-notify => output-bmk-results/error_code-1} (100%) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/extra-bisect-params delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect delete mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 mail/exe.regression