This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
omits 0d011fb1 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 703887a6 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 43d625ac onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 753520e1 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 97ed1137 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 340a950a onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 1c87d4d9 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 0cda9b31 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 25bebad3 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 17b0f415 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits b84afa21 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 70b2537b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits a6b190a6 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits b75ab700 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 6f5d4f64 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits edd27bb1 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits c39ea3d1 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 436cfb8e 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 99b2dedd 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 2f801cb7 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 75efac56 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits f2735211 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] omits 3eac925f 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] omits c30cbcb5 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits b9eb231c 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] omits f03d6d54 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 22580635 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 7467a44a 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] omits 6369d599 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 57c0f14b 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] omits 4db577ef 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] omits fd5c635f 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] omits 593d5eb9 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 6c625baa 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits omits d54eafbb 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] omits 54e915da 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] omits 4beded99 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits omits ccceee9d 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits omits ddaa99e9 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 976a6392 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 5c4c38c3 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits c38984c6 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] omits 7f593a3c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 19fddefd 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] omits c17141c8 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 1b1a3d9a 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] omits 5e5b7da7 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits b2f280fc 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] omits a4e285e3 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits b4e7bacb 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 5e308480 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 106424cb 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 55fdf5cb 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 2ec68c74 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 0a27a6a7 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] omits 3e7c20c4 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 4088ad74 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 2f3e45ee 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] omits b29f551e 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 878b1ddb 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits adc438b2 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] omits aad086dc 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] omits ee410bbe 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] omits 63654a4a 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits c447b71f 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] omits f8c434d0 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] omits 35487562 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 17c9c506 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] omits 065fa97a 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits omits ab62439d 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] omits 388b4b4b 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits omits 835d8ae1 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] omits f17d8497 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] omits ac3b37da 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 3d1c0b16 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] omits aa836e09 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits ea21057a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits b7a6333c 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 9fa8f2b8 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits bc9093e8 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits e8257e17 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits f6cd9d62 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 2a1bb094 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] omits 68554c15 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] omits 034a9c79 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits omits 4c255a6a 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits omits 56063bd3 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] omits 2fa8c98d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] omits 700254d0 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits omits c2a8a300 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 75d8a3f3 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits ef240ecd 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] omits b6a63c3b 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits omits fc0356b2 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 536bd697 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 9ff3076d 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 4d5e0eb2 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] omits d1ff3dde 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] omits eb6035d3 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 4317f132 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3777094e 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 234f2ba8 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1022fa23 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 9c9cd515 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 1b493736 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d8fb959e 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d8a86065 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5293fc68 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new e2cb4a44 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new db8e1dc5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 94287577 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 7b61d759 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new d6c1eb06 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new e926e690 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 0f638065 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 6911e929 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 001faeb0 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 2b64e295 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 86d98d63 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f04e8f72 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8e25340d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4685a701 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9e906e0d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 5ba5697a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new aa3feeaf 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0ba70631 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 0384e536 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 628a042f 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 709a49db 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new fcff092e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new e004af3c 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new f790d0b8 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 464f7b5a 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 52186424 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new e2c654dc 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 92b85b13 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 3bbc1510 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 6fbf5ecd 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 3e5d1154 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 0c294973 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 643e9161 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 2f50df6f 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3a0ba3d9 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 631fd4bb 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 1e48aee3 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 910238dd 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new b7473f79 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new f914eeda 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d909b75a 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 9853a8a3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 496b2554 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 878bd039 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 23af69e9 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 144d26ac 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1da38f6e 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 978c3662 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 49e942c1 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new d7fd5036 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new f845ba76 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 5a6c682a 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6c08de7f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ae0b60be 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 4f717d56 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new d6a734c7 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 463df96d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new b8b48d3c 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new d39c8bc0 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 31ba88d2 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 8b942ff3 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new de2d1537 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new b7a9c81e 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 996c7c0e 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new b648a8a9 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new c571f6ae 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new da6af0bb 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 92d73670 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new d0331fbb 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 0d6233da 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 8d0426ae 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 6eed8e59 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a0a7cb2e 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 32262745 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bc464c6f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2562fdc5 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4505e801 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 27148e37 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f51a1e7a 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9808ac67 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1d17a7a1 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4b1d1c45 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2f856d80 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a168399c 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0f257663 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 8b711218 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 93e95bcc onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 169136dd onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 40098a2f onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d7d7de40 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a608e9fe onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 48b6e098 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a4212baf onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (0d011fb1) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2556 -> 2624 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2636 -> 2712 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27968 -> 28172 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17720 -> 17636 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92856 -> 94204 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 72484 -> 72544 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8548 -> 7884 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233372 -> 236952 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185476 -> 185976 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 215820 -> 218796 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 184416 -> 184092 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 119 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3468 -> 3496 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 5712 -> 5736 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 108 +- annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 332 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 104 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 24 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/jira/{comments.txt => comment-template.txt} | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 58 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 1732 +- results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 178 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 27644 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 385216 ++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 10509 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 493 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 50 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 176 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 36403 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 532455 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 10509 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 493 - results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 66 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 192 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 32 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4324 +- 52 files changed, 491199 insertions(+), 520444 deletions(-) rename notify/jira/{comments.txt => comment-template.txt} (51%)