This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards a0e33b003 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f2a627e63 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b6219425c onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b84ec43ba onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 87615d5ab onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6b7c70e95 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 50f4fe55b onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0267999e6 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 36a94be2b onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7bce55ef2 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3194515f8 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f98656f42 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4dc4ee8e9 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 69f13ec51 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5e314a641 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 3f4994a70 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7e3600a08 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b53a5f3b2 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 80dc73f91 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 9d5245fd6 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 14cd6a48c 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 79982438a 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 18df0137f 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 759917260 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards febf23931 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 0520235ff 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards a93857b68 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 926082963 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards c47603cd8 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards eb7b2d0cb 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards f014dd956 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards d370a1947 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 2cf06e68b 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 1722f329a 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 87030d9f0 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 8e868ee06 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 93168567e 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards a6804095f 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 164a299e7 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 8787ecfe2 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 024c341de 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards cba919820 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards cc2780702 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a5f17b340 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 533bdfe3a 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 28fffb46c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards c0779a9e2 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 04d7be532 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c7009dcb4 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 437476cee 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 908e7907d 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards e218ee03e 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 774e57245 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 80bbb7aac 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c09a8aff3 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards aa1ddc967 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 95b389d53 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 090e77ac0 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards c2179cbdc 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards ffbe045e9 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 40ba1d274 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards a47b4e3a4 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 715d011cf 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 886845645 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards b365f9113 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 906ebd768 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 801c50f8c 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 7d0c3ad2f 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 3da2fc629 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards ac337f64b 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 4401cd46b 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 87330c33b 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 19b29261e 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 027665f36 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 3ee79f979 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards d08b36dfd 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 08713eeab 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 0be2f13c8 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards f89f0b35d 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 6ec2a77e4 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8760b1b42 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards f5268cee5 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4a68ef476 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7be408ee2 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7300a6356 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9ad2c4758 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 50ee4eaef 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 8633b600d 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 09335cc9b 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 57e0ec24c 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards dd15c9618 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards a66cced83 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards e78f0d8e2 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 8c6e0c602 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f1918e4af 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 2026712cb 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards e58f09695 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 03c937d9f 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e7497217f 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0764d1a91 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 43d9d891d 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 8f56c4c63 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 05b7384a1 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bef370661 onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new de760ec26 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7400cba35 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new a60d4e021 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 60ff83ac8 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2a26adf81 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dcd4ce9cb 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c1e9630a8 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 2366bfc74 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 1415c8948 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new dca1a33dd 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 371dfd7ab 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 4bbd18425 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 553ebd726 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 4e378b0c3 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new a61f16a86 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 4035ad6f1 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 6681b093b 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 6bbb18e58 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 04f7d74ac 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d82a7a642 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8857b6bc3 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 896dc4b67 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 9b6065297 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 45e6a71bb 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 53e472fdc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new e4bdc9fe3 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 479bc9f39 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 648c21c27 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 4354cf9a4 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new f4888861a 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 603640f4d 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 2a544f690 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 7201b16eb 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 5309a1b8f 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 16e44059d 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 1d05b4b1a 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new b3a4a77af 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 91b1fa849 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 84913700e 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 8a2f1e605 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new bff919cd9 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new a68c7dcc5 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 95f364213 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e02d13e01 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new b3947f1b7 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 5970bb66d 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 7f7a93af2 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d5c9e010d 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f233a40dc 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1bcfd082f 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 0d7ff9d98 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new f0c16e84e 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new b38ea64e7 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d7a9a5a40 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new f1524d948 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1ed65e73e 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 44394ca70 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 5b9c54094 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new d7b225140 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6d82c07cf 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4d1756e1f 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 8ccf91e72 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new d438be42a 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new e37919034 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 0507fd0cb 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 06dbbccb3 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new e361409a1 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 0d811562e 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 7a117d246 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 8fc8cc3b0 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new c21578d1d 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 6c8bc9c66 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 4bdf2299b 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 5163cdc2c 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 5628508d4 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 46b72522b 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 403a618f3 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 0433edbce 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 495d10d78 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 73b7ff03c 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8c81d44d4 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 75278ec36 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 33941925d 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a823a5f90 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e6e94e8cb 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 40081179c 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5c3cd8356 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 8196f8c41 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 99a8b9a3a 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 72b4e1925 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b65c33f96 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new fadbd1834 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new aa13676b1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9963f8a5c onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 813f59672 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 548b80f07 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f0a78bdf0 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9cb4fdb95 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ca4a730b8 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0ada3cd5d onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c95d077d1 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 91e490046 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a0e33b003) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 103 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: