This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO.
discards a98f7af0 onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5ee2afd9 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1f3f9f49 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 71efd024 onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 111b9c48 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f0cb7b16 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 77e39c0b onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b64f6055 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 67cb8ff3 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3f7b2524 onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 68310619 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fe13795a onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3049b961 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 392140c9 onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 06b101c3 onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 41c06a86 onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 886ea1fe force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards f6059043 force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 6b11567a 90: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b2470c6f 89: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0349bdde 88: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5e6cf506 87: force: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0d0f6b38 86: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6dbd48f2 85: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4c7109fb 84: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 680f45fe 83: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards db1e75a2 82: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 76eb47fe 81: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards dc276a31 80: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 836a2861 79: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c01c1d96 78: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f59e30cd 77: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3f464023 76: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 640c1738 75: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 297b6cbc 74: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8c627148 73: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 1257 commits discards b941f6fe 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 285 commits discards ec44d732 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards 02845bba 70: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards 5e645b12 69: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 733edea3 68: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 454 commits discards 148add4d 67: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 216 commits discards 7f27f74d 66: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 391 commits discards 3d9ed79d 65: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 159 commits discards 47d1bfe8 64: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 487 commits discards 1ca00340 63: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 711 commits discards 40170a77 62: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cae2563e 61: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 43fc9657 60: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 928ce3cf 59: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0cc4883f 58: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cf75facc 57: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d9937c91 56: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 69e59579 55: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6bf4865e 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc: [...] discards 2c8ed41c 53: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -5% [...] discards be504bb8 52: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards e5b617f3 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7d097bdc 50: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 2e578d9b 49: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 106de54d 48: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/llvm [...] discards ac14c0d9 47: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a5cf9d54 46: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 42b9f024 45: onsuccess: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII speeds up by -4% [...] discards 0ff3de0d 44: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0e7b5f2f 43: onsuccess: #509: 1: [TCWG CI] 470.lbm speeds up by -11% a [...] discards bf9834d2 42: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards e48a6acb 41: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards c5cd7096 40: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards 0fa91755 39: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2dd576cb 38: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng speeds up by -5% [...] discards 02045e0d 37: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] discards 5fdca5a7 36: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits discards 0a4a91d6 35: force: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after wor [...] discards c7a09a93 34: force: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 191 commits discards a0f00984 33: onsuccess: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3c94ba26 32: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 879ffdd6 31: onsuccess: #490: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5ffa8be7 30: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 90bd72f2 29: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e6157b68 28: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 32eba67c 27: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c3aeb627 26: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 49e0e2a3 25: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1310bfea 24: onsuccess: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 96103329 23: onsuccess: #470: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] discards e91817fb 22: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0f4f7043 21: onsuccess: #468: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 72c3e80e 20: onsuccess: #466: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 1136bfe9 19: onsuccess: #464: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 125 commits discards 90b374d0 18: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] discards 1d2af3ee 17: force: #462: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 95 commits discards bc5b09d8 16: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-16-init [...] discards f6c05cea 15: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 117 commits discards bd3bb51f 14: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5a8537fe 13: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards 5a93efca 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 3d5d4e7e 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 76332989 10: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 46403b22 9: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/glibc [...] new 01c1ad56 onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 33e02c2d 10: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 8ed9a3f0 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new a35d6732 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 49c68724 13: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new 42303917 14: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8b151e9b 15: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 117 commits new 1a680503 16: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-16-init [...] new 46369f56 17: force: #462: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 95 commits new 7ccafe96 18: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] new 8c1536f2 19: onsuccess: #464: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 125 commits new c4fde5ea 20: onsuccess: #466: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 26f540d1 21: onsuccess: #468: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 611f097e 22: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 10f37f5e 23: onsuccess: #470: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] new ebffd8d8 24: onsuccess: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 50ce5369 25: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0f549b0b 26: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e2525159 27: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a90915f2 28: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7f68df10 29: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2fab64e5 30: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 10fa5e3d 31: onsuccess: #490: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 508684b7 32: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 92c19445 33: onsuccess: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ad2854ca 34: force: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 191 commits new 66d59674 35: force: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after wor [...] new 7a0cd783 36: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new b528bbac 37: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] new 2428cd9c 38: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng speeds up by -5% [...] new e6c981a1 39: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 63282391 40: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new 76e8e95c 41: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 7b75e72b 42: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 8e2c8d0d 43: onsuccess: #509: 1: [TCWG CI] 470.lbm speeds up by -11% a [...] new 2b2df83c 44: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f12a7701 45: onsuccess: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII speeds up by -4% [...] new 93829ef4 46: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c6e22e23 47: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ac9ab891 48: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/llvm [...] new 6dd9b76e 49: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d6f8a476 50: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new f22ba65a 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 131f2c4e 52: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 3d9da5b6 53: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -5% [...] new f58683b2 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc: [...] new 7ef05ca4 55: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 469066cd 56: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d73ee06d 57: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f2b32178 58: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 08fbe9b7 59: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8c96e56c 60: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 69d2fc4f 61: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2b58aba1 62: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7ec3de40 63: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 711 commits new 5ed03ffd 64: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 487 commits new 6dfc5602 65: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 159 commits new cbe51a6e 66: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 391 commits new f8c2f45a 67: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 216 commits new 5a638b72 68: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 454 commits new 25c86798 69: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench slowed down by 5% a [...] new 8feeb0d9 70: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new 3836c958 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new 35c29220 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 285 commits new 0de0f2fe 73: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 1257 commits new 77dcb665 74: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3dda89ae 75: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b6f25440 76: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7d8915c1 77: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d5f09fca 78: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 38ba9a15 79: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4273186f 80: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 189b6805 81: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 21ae7149 82: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 660409a1 83: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2df4089d 84: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f48986b4 85: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 522b5cde 86: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 25085629 87: force: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1dd36da9 88: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c7a4b889 89: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2064c156 90: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1c2aec88 force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new adf4d0ef force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new c37e859f onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8739f050 onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3d5a1af1 onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 51a82780 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fd7c2e26 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ecaeffc3 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c78fa928 onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4d92c024 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 75179a30 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 202d971c onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f3dc4070 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e299a386 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4f1c13ce onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c6c176eb onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 550b5261 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 50790bd1 onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a98f7af0) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 100 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: