This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards fea467302b 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1aa96018eb 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6c679fea9a 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 1857ce8adf 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 217078eb26 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards 02aefeb4da 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards adc7e908fb 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 28437a3dc8 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 1cbbb5b71f 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 7e4eaa21f7 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 2a30bc6fff 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 60a2cf810b 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 43c0973dc6 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 32128ae259 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 1a6a1264b1 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 43505240ee 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards e53ec254f2 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 0651cef7b8 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards a413a168c4 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 9283827120 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards e0655035d4 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 9fbd73139c 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards d68879c9fc 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards a06f2472c0 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 056c6f9812 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 70b9790925 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d3c1ab21a8 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 0f59ec5a01 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 1e10efaf33 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 661e6cacd9 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 70fe1f4081 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards d2e5173461 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 739e19db01 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a6bed1a362 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d462482c94 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 2d5983f635 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 7f8ffe81a5 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards f6910b1170 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 2f121176f4 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards b701007dfd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 81d40bac5e 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards b149119e1e 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 31cb162fc8 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards a386cba211 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 05bf5066e0 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards a7b14cae57 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 65a2d94133 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 6edda8b7fa 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 53d9d40bd5 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 764c3ec8de 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 609ded46d9 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards e86a37cce7 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ff784999ad 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 02cb056aa8 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards be3f7e15dd 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 690c1a2287 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards aec7565f6f 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 9f6ed38af6 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 0a971e5eea 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 4186be3601 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 28bf716cc4 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2add345bd5 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards a5edde2924 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards a15eeaa53b 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 5302b82944 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 876eed5bdb 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards ae0fe69fea 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3f4e0879c1 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards a23af88e8e 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 75cf8fdc76 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 8bce7eeb36 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 1d62a6f7c6 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards 7051993a80 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards bc3e548c57 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards ce399101d8 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 1f3de905f2 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 85f89a33f5 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 2d0c694459 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 796aaf9236 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 0e011b5eb3 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0a13734a27 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards af6dd98dd6 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 0c342b8d4b 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 16810ddff8 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards b81522a8f7 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 4907e2122d 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 2d1dd95d8b 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 42a2f2e5a7 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards e3fa0b8d1c 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 6070a98aec 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards eac6a4b6b1 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 544369f0d0 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] discards 4e65a93b4f 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] discards 1f3de5349e 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 47d75112c6 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 91932f7f3f 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4619222672 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3372a7e7d2 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3dd5d8444b 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards e22bf5b0c1 3: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits discards 714112c1ad 2: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 3209 commits new 7849eaf1bb 2: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 3209 commits new 5da63ba81f 3: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits new f29b3dc083 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 1ea1af2ac9 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8dc2c2c2f6 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5b0a4a5dec 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3a15212f98 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new dac76df411 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new a0d676f65f 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] new bbed82219c 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new cad565a283 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new fa0108031d 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 1c4829bb73 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 2f1931c0b0 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new aab4c8673d 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0629549b06 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new ee8404550f 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 53e96447b6 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new d64e70e07c 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new a1612d926e 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 7032ab0dca 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new e32b6a4d06 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8ff32069db 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a180fa1c26 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 8c00e637d1 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 95e1c09792 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c8f25bdc4e 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 02757dfea2 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 64c154371c 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new bb789446b8 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 52013e0594 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 8e4d6e9d82 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 77b770d544 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new f452e26804 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 87e7a55e26 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0de1e62e54 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 000131fd76 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 4da1fe0018 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 332772129d 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 289229a651 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new ea8e88cb18 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new efc7afc2e8 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 4bd9ec2e88 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new a9e29791dd 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 187c10f42f 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new aac76b7d43 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 5fc2bcb143 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 08609de39c 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new cd1d7c6323 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 32ba236c03 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 27c0894142 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new 9d2891f0e7 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new f0c3c00975 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new cfe806c9fc 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 9017fbd0dc 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 6abc506de3 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new a72e36db0b 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 8142a988b1 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new bf98f247d3 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 63949bebb6 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new eb94180479 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 24aa56dba4 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 4d0cf82aff 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 35ca15a22c 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 6608c0b0b0 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 12e46312d1 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 0357947b6b 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 1de2ccf5d2 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a3db906ed8 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new b82f939205 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new b507d8fd87 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 07aa5e43ab 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 0be29dcb25 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 733104159f 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 117e30d590 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e1d8b2ed1f 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 184607e306 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b81a928821 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new cb1374888c 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 50d0ce594e 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 2ab3973f03 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new 025d135db8 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new c1d3fe15b1 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ebdb3cb2fd 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new ae6f41c9c4 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new cbf842aa30 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 59d7a7ca07 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 5061430279 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new c1cf0aa1a9 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 251d6864ab 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9201769aac 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 7d5d49bf85 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new a79d67b19e 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 30230826ef 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 018557b84a 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d118eca804 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 293addb2d0 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 1f5081ef8b 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 1fe5154d3e 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 2086dae918 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new b6cdf414f0 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ef4ede2709 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (fea467302b) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2068 -> 2080 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2556 -> 2504 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27144 -> 27516 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 89384 -> 89544 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8376 -> 8424 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233252 -> 233480 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211440 -> 211072 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 192 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 190 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4300 -> 4280 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 170 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 16204 -> 16440 bytes .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 7 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- .../results_id.first | 0 11-update_baseline/console.log | 71 +- dashboard/dashboard-generate.sh | 17 - dashboard/dashboard-push.sh | 7 - git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/dashboard-push.sh | 7 - jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 240 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 24 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 24 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3041 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3407 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 54106 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 703764 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 27888 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 72 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 154 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3235 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3648 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 244 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 10 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2867 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3372 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 19054 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 620635 +++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 23612 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3039 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3407 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 54106 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 703764 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 27888 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 72 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 154 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3459 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4280 +- results_id | 2 +- 62 files changed, 1172700 insertions(+), 1098766 deletions(-) rename results_id.first => 10-check_regression/results_id.first (100%) delete mode 100755 dashboard/dashboard-generate.sh delete mode 100755 dashboard/dashboard-push.sh delete mode 100755 jenkins/dashboard-push.sh