This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 4e1e814bc6 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 244456bfcd onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 00bc2dd507 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 01e81bb3d5 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 61f7619163 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 415b7f7217 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 9fd50e2129 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5778332927 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 33c9bce4d4 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards d295c4b9d0 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards c517f3fa30 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 9391b0242c 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 29f3c6ebbd 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0d05059d86 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ef19473721 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ce2cf19c06 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 765aafce57 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b35b17e529 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards df0acdfb9f 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8f06b75fe7 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5869b3ee9d 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards d9a0eb9768 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 6dadab1d34 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards 0f7bcc45c8 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 3432c5348f 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3e9f90a273 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards cfbf8b77e3 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards f545900b11 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 427ad17f48 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 38a5c0c18e 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dff82af28a 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b3103d1cca 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 0354a83429 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 12f0cf3f8d 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards cc8837a87e 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards b0f22858c6 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards c2aa8cf0ba 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d057c681ca 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 690566a99c 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 48738c49bd 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 66f3594868 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards 11248a7af5 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards d8d196e047 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3e54a7eb4e 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3662522621 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b49a219081 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 5fca3f1bd3 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 19d9e94a7a 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 8ab467ee0f 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards ba5fbeb433 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 6d6ae969dd 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 407db3eea8 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 82c37cff96 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 2a5fb14df9 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards a507a8a058 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 3cab91cadb 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards e3f4890aca 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards e36e0bef3a 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 4dda60766a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 21084a34f5 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 1315d42018 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 585163f13f 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f1a6d17a3b 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 0d6fb02a2a 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards e038c165b5 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 6550cfd779 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 071b5d693f 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 890f13b80a 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 02b27cdd79 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 17531562f1 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5af951a8c2 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3dcd1c46b4 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards fd594f6936 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards d832493f55 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards d97fc135cf 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards b8e3129015 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 2f67784a47 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 8aa716a1a7 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 3ddff02eb8 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1593b305dd 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 01924e48b1 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards fdf84c9097 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 60cd299f29 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 81c7650ee5 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 0bd30664a3 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards a7699ab634 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards c97425ec74 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 82041c3df0 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards f571c06bbb 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 8ebaf8a654 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards de3f1e456a 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 53bbef9ccb 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards d908444f1d 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards b987cce301 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bced0f8610 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 0fd2cfab9c 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 897114321c 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b69c9b7321 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9e4de62dbe 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 8b6d78ffd3 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 6872407946 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 74ac269f5e 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 9bbbc4b7d6 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 49df7364e7 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ffd91e12ff 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new ff11c1ebc3 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new d9977fcf35 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c537097784 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 687dd69b71 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 87ff085d68 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new b4f69a7954 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 6358a14205 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 90e1c3ea91 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 63a09122e6 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 6df1d1df87 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 5970474bc6 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 213a31d3b1 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 6b6fbbcaf2 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 04523b978e 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new ca304008ac 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 489269933c 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 709bd7d503 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e148ab1c3b 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new b79f39a4b3 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 02b2d2322e 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 4c58c96386 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 6cd837ca03 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d200eadddf 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 00f682aa21 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a2b4fc6024 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 09c439dfb3 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8e6532f712 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new fe0f9e3278 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 5af6652387 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 33bd107ef0 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new c94b52c405 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new fdf8d87809 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 84ae70fa17 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new ce29cf3396 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new fcc1acd826 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new fead004f1c 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 6364f57cf8 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 5d3e7dbbdb 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 82e21ccbf5 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 956fdf0c59 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new b54841089a 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 3c7e14cefc 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new ba320c747c 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new c327f40e2c 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new cfcf423291 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 1384567d80 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new aee071ccc3 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 3734344967 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new da7bd4ec58 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 5e30c6efce 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 0c642aa3e6 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 77afea68d1 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3c5b246ee3 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b276a5f9fc 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new ba8beb0635 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 1b244ac6fc 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new a95276245c 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new febd3c759c 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 1667a37a0c 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 955caf75e5 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new f336e14722 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 8703be4e3e 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new c271998596 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 824f198c2d 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 7dfab694c0 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8c51e287c1 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new df8de84269 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new ff33ee13ae 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 4d441dedb8 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 02d0d8dc01 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new b7353e322d 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0bea3cdd8e 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 759fac0ce3 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new bef09a880b 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new a904eb6fb3 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new cb7491ac06 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 4c0b95da46 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c9233f47d2 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d0c5cb9be9 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 85431bf4fc 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f6ac936c29 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7c13fc31a1 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 60e9dfafbf 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fe53259e4d 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 34340420ba 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 1fbdad0f9f 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 0286be0b2c 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 41a858abc8 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 2e282b4f96 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5f91a45fb9 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fa00ff1f0d 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b862d252b6 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6d426d9404 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new cc76b11f52 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 067915417d onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ba9da97f99 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (4e1e814bc6) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2372 -> 2352 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2640 -> 2656 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27252 -> 27500 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17692 -> 17628 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90788 -> 91004 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70636 -> 69928 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8612 -> 8796 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233832 -> 234604 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 186128 -> 186148 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 213536 -> 213160 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179916 -> 179192 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 201 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 199 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4192 -> 4124 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 198 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6844 -> 5496 bytes git/binutils_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- manifest.sh | 23 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2837 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3520 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 37534 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 699407 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28274 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 60 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2960 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3538 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 51529 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 604134 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 22182 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3466 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 248 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 6086 +- results_id | 2 +- 41 files changed, 757288 insertions(+), 710270 deletions(-)