This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO.
discards a12c235f onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9c92175d onsuccess: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 834be32e onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fa2983d2 onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a8baf58b onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards be3d3e24 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ebad5db6 onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f6366b86 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d0d3579a onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c402355f onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3682d06b onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b5c71554 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 740149c5 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cdfbb8f3 onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 146d7630 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 81da2244 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a1e0da32 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards edd3b486 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0c59b695 onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b4eceb83 onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3002c1ee onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b6086b58 onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c4d144aa onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c025afff onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8d0532d0 force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 802fa769 force: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 605377eb 83: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3b2dd9bb 82: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a7d427df 81: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 560e5cde 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2c07faf8 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b7d14a70 78: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 57440cc9 77: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 95b39f0d 76: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ab59e69b 75: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7ba1cd81 74: force: #19: milc_base.default [...] discards 36c321d9 73: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b6ba3a57 72: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ab6a28d4 71: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 456 commits discards c0d38d85 70: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 892 commits discards 1339a55b 69: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 364 commits discards 8f068a5f 68: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 227 commits discards 17bdcc57 67: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 365 commits discards 93629be2 66: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 400 commits discards 87483f37 65: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 263 commits discards f25af642 64: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 403 commits discards 0469795b 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 87 commits discards 00baf538 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 536 commits discards bedcdc02 61: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 616 commits discards d6c5e1cc 60: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d06f5bda 59: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 03a7ef91 58: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a8819b83 57: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b4310a1d 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f7040ea9 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cefefb0a 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -6% [...] discards 22e08d10 53: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7a55096f 52: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 128 commits discards 49794597 51: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 4% af [...] discards efecf4e3 50: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 253 commits discards 32c04873 49: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 2be753d6 48: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 243 commits discards d464ec75 47: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 65645e6b 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards aad714c2 45: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards bfbb001d 44: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards e38e6d47 43: onsuccess: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 72e6e598 42: onsuccess: #538: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6bb9df84 41: onsuccess: #537: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 78e9ed6e 40: onsuccess: #527: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] discards 86fc2b62 39: onsuccess: #525: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 85e4fe75 38: force: #519: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after working-4297-gf [...] discards a15d373a 37: onsuccess: #517: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 906913eb 36: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 325 commits discards 901a3897 35: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after llv [...] discards 1ef5f8bf 34: force: #513: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 56 commits discards add17931 33: onsuccess: #510: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 41ea34e6 32: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by -4 [...] discards 6bdbdbc1 31: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards fba59db9 30: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards 3a0a6af3 29: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 74c8109d 28: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3958f29d 27: onsuccess: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] discards 2a374a11 26: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c05f7683 25: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] discards e5bb81ff 24: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6917c978 23: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4082191e 22: onsuccess: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9239c3a9 21: force: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f7a30817 20: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4a1b700d 19: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 75c2a77f 18: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dbc20cad 17: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] discards eece4091 16: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 313f52bd 15: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5d405916 14: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards added9a2 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 714 commits discards bcf946a4 12: force: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] discards c3294a82 11: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 93da832b 10: force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 31ddc8e9 9: onsuccess: #473: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 52251c72 8: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards b7a309cb 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 11 commits new 760ec690 onsuccess: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1776d8ed 8: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 4489b313 9: onsuccess: #473: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4a38523a 10: force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by -4% af [...] new 2537b794 11: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 755c07b5 12: force: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] new 33e707b7 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 714 commits new 1011fcd9 14: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7d00d080 15: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d5c1e5da 16: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3e34c249 17: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] new 100eb39e 18: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0ee00f7c 19: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2a4b3626 20: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 24e0131f 21: force: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 90e23d73 22: onsuccess: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8e0112c6 23: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b2b93fba 24: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7b153b7d 25: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] new a3b5dfb9 26: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5665ec04 27: onsuccess: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] new 720ab125 28: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 08b76464 29: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 53c72d97 30: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new e965716b 31: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new e0f1b5f4 32: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by -4 [...] new 08a3d484 33: onsuccess: #510: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 30f5c56e 34: force: #513: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 56 commits new cc3df0ff 35: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after llv [...] new 7e7c4326 36: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 325 commits new 28abe59d 37: onsuccess: #517: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9f7ab4f3 38: force: #519: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after working-4297-gf [...] new 1d571b45 39: onsuccess: #525: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5ad9ce6f 40: onsuccess: #527: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] new 4796bf39 41: onsuccess: #537: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e933cd4a 42: onsuccess: #538: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0f20a16d 43: onsuccess: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 28e0e047 44: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a742e94d 45: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new c5f1b644 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 6cd08b2c 47: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 51e034ed 48: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 243 commits new 6bdf99b0 49: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% af [...] new 10feff3b 50: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 253 commits new 316237e4 51: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 4% af [...] new c08aa7a7 52: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 128 commits new 98c95ba6 53: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new bb3eecb1 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -6% [...] new 3b92ac34 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f432dd3f 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b04fe8a2 57: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 43ac57dc 58: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a48eb1a3 59: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2b8a1613 60: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c8b9f748 61: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 616 commits new 41cdeeae 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 536 commits new e6ec4aca 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 87 commits new ef723e44 64: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 403 commits new 16f0afc3 65: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 263 commits new 7b7fb4f3 66: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 400 commits new ee1555c4 67: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 365 commits new 3ac7bec6 68: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 227 commits new c1ecdb77 69: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 364 commits new eb950a7e 70: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 892 commits new 2d99bbcc 71: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 456 commits new 5754d1ed 72: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8c032968 73: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 56d2faff 74: force: #19: milc_base.default [...] new 54e1ecc9 75: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 47eeaae3 76: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new bdab8820 77: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 14759e54 78: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c4c71a19 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ad8f382b 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 95f40ded 81: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8843d2f2 82: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4e8c24bd 83: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1c893294 force: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 83f28434 force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new ae5b192d onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1ccac2a0 onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4e9995b5 onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ddd73b5b onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fe3481a4 onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 05fd8a44 onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c44dddab onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9e6419d9 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1ae38f0d onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 162447b6 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a2ec6181 onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3e638486 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6b3720fc onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 127c72e1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 40fa4700 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2ff9c8c4 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 85af8211 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2bfe17ba onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0bd49f64 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f6618df8 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f1c0c0f2 onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e83e0471 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 514c96e6 onsuccess: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4c4b0475 onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a12c235f) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 103 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: