This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2.
discards 97b4ae815 onsuccess: #105: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6949154e6 onsuccess: #104: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 161359382 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 28afea36a onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards edfb91abd onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c1bf8a398 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c30a57c64 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9178f4431 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c5338c47e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5d38ef389 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 67339d92e onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fbf4ffb1c onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1d9607596 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards aae47ea3a onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a3fe2872f onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b878f03c3 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 8a38c0d50 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a34935c1c 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards af63b22b7 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 62f5e9e22 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c6c412f6e 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d39b229e8 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 762958cab 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 57764a0dc 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 39f6db03b 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b67f05cf6 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 010568f77 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0a8c08a2e 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 60a48bc9d 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 45fdc861f 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 463f7a685 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 83219bdca 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d436c2b6e 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] discards 190009702 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards bdd4b0871 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits discards 5c0cedb52 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards edc8ae9ec 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 09e4ad511 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 0b203f1e8 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] discards 83d6aad25 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards ca08a50dd 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards b73dcd2d4 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 87518bbfa 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9f56cb674 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 6194fb3c2 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 529b8acd9 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 4e0feb968 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 288540d95 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards 7b87e6e0a 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 00ab083de 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] discards 5e884e573 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] discards a91696f0a 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] discards b1c395a2b 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] discards 7caa52632 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] discards e55289185 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 68691077a 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5fc50144d 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e67ed941a 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards a4ebeb491 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 744982db4 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards dd96890e9 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] discards 86ba0d86b 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards d96fa2c84 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 2550f1fbc 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3209638ef 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards e86a190cf 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards eb5a00520 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 2a3c2ecc2 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits discards 0ddb82359 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] discards 861df817d 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards dc8806338 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards dd1033bb5 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] discards dca38128d 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] discards ee1006266 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6996b2001 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 5e4115f20 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] discards ab24390c4 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] discards a8a916140 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards f0f911bbf 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1924a8ee6 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] discards 997a2a27a 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] discards 738e57880 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 05c3f02a5 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a9b6fe264 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 02c346bf7 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] discards a8fb7f53f 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 5757c8a17 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards f00cbc45f 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] discards 7f9229187 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] discards 6cadf9dd0 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 331a1bd48 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards df5434369 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 49a507857 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 3d5d75b5a 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards ec12f5f62 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 041fe8efa 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards ce2357cca 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] discards c65ccb764 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards ae169d1da 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 56abbd6ca 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 2ef9700f7 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 4acbf13b6 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] discards fb2b94e80 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards b21c12240 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 9b530b7f9 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 8ee5b8003 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 14d63744c 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 597bae7ab 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 24102400b 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards acec308b8 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f9e15236c 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 91f90cc27 force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new 8b87482d4 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ef5ad3e88 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 33fa0aa16 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 989a1fbf6 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 6b420a4c9 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 62531d7e8 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d8af8f1be 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 996c699e2 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 66d9dcb48 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] new 6bdfd0a3d 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new cad36f52b 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 4f5897392 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 2a9b02a13 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 956f59c1d 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] new 634f943fa 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new be6889094 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new cbab70f18 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 0e94ad2b9 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 7dcae92a6 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new c027db737 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 3f8c59c83 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new c2a561bbe 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] new 96aa190eb 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] new c2a2d3637 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new e3f861861 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new dbf70943b 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] new 1d7ef75bf 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 819d019d7 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 07641d60c 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 04c695116 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] new 14079beb3 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] new 524fc20ff 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2bc9904da 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 598ed299c 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] new 678ae9844 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] new f0f62654d 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new b93ca99d2 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 858f6e0ff 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] new 7abf06c1f 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] new 88b26a34c 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new de208626e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 6a749e241 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] new 7b286bb27 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits new cd1bda2df 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new b726fb53f 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new 678514203 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 2ef924cfd 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f979d27b3 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new be2d289b1 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 386483718 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] new 5ffd1dd1a 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 95348f397 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new e0d3d2e18 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 59ba3badd 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e7dd7cb2a 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 35c37870f 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e6e9fa097 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] new 685653cf0 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] new b353dbac0 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] new 309a93f35 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] new f0b30a78a 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] new 4ed81e72f 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new f664c8a23 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new b43189956 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new a73f305fe 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new e015a2bdc 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 8a009241d 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new d6cdfe0cd 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1ae839406 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 85795df60 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new fb26708e6 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 49d0e4276 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] new 1ae8508e6 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 497b43fea 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new aeb41c824 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 4615a145b 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits new b3caf7527 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 26a2755d6 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] new d3dd96f39 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e14a4294a 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 76b2a0fd1 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 87da80eb7 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6f99df5c0 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 35b1e1aa8 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b6d2e7814 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1dcafd9bc 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b0b8f03c1 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9753f9198 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 699737294 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b9fae5c25 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ef55c023e 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1eb6287a0 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 01a3c3fa5 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4d08b45c7 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4e2028a50 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1020474ca onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 425a4b9c7 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b980b5402 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d13421a21 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 32492a90d onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 29faf2d32 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f122b6e88 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b29f13eeb onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e6fcec213 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 087e3ea2a onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a5276b6a5 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 3c72d055a onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 70cb4edc7 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 7b35b0986 onsuccess: #104: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 638022fed onsuccess: #105: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (97b4ae815) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 111 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: