[Tcwg-commits] [toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (6751e956 -> a16010c6)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 6751e956 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 4afa19a0 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 78a8b1d6 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards df2b1c72 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 68d84bf3 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 969a78b7 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7d729fa5 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cca8eb87 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 12182297 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards adbb5977 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a8ba03a8 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d506bbb3 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e9d76518 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5591f7c3 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 60006eb5 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 03799ee5 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 47776d2a 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fe377c11 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8c997ca7 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards af65e08b 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 82dcfb88 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e5889583 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 58ce7390 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards ac76c558 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 3ded1d3e 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 5fa70649 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 64b27ca2 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 2107c730 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards a0824850 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 2d67636b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards f24162f1 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards ce72f2be 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards b42413ce 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards d81ff959 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards bd5ec0b2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 36bf87ad 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 4bc0a7f5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 540ccc60 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 3e2b76a3 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 227b4b28 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 18934700 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 28bed546 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4af750d2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards b32759a0 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards b2c870bc 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 57553120 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ae4059d1 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 5754f0b8 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 64adb53d 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 882cb38a 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e1ce33de 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards e54719e8 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards dc12cec5 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 0cdaf85f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ee1d2099 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 4f50bddf 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards ff7e4fee 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 66102b86 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 365a9704 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards df80e6b1 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6d0d1825 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 92af2dcf 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 4c77f2f5 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards d4259a92 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 9c55ecca 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 1dd8e123 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards a9686744 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards a2e61be4 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d67595a0 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards f94bee22 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards cdebbbf9 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 2f58b2ed 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 9499f338 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 0d36aee4 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 8828bc11 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 9cf7885a 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 12b86a83 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 03190190 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9680842d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 47b0946e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 52cf0693 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5056fc5e 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3faf3eda 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 207024ac 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 083839ae 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 6ad3b11e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 5afff72c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 67199ada 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards e787effc 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 5e8958d0 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 91a8a563 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 00c6eae5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 8d5e1a2c 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 5e5dc14e 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 4ec75d9c 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 46ef631c 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 15db25e7 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1b338897 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards dc330aeb 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 54c62052 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 48f17e59 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7214c345 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8a7c65d1 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards b7f52edd 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 475316f0 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f3ed55de 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] discards 7061649e 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 33c75345 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards e1954857 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards b0d863f0 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 8fe1c632 onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4e438505 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new d7454284 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 41236229 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 43129ea7 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new fa20608e 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5c5351b0 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6e53b2d4 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 46b08d74 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ce2ead16 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dda90c38 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a3ad941b 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 6b440a47 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new e3adb1ff 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f8cbd04b 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 24ebc8d4 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5e77fe31 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new f6ad0d0c 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 5d8a3406 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a954ea04 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 9bcfae62 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 6305b90d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new ccf330ee 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 88ce76eb 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 08ea60cf 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 14f2c157 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new a87cd46a 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new a2bef4c9 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4f323765 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ca45603e 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 810fb471 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 71dbb1c3 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new dba5c930 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9332114e 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 5f1fd185 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 1b99150d 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 27c43da9 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 5d6ea8c9 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new e5c5f8ae 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 073d042d 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new e5838f39 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new d4ce6c58 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new fe0f749a 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new ded75e6a 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 85372d19 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new dc3ab85f 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new a42e4276 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new a5c969a4 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 879c2db4 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 20afdd58 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new dd0ea5d3 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2250082b 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 911b57be 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new db4d7ed0 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d897732f 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 06211c68 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new bef771ef 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b362b12d 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f0aeb0ea 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1c4a5130 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 77dccf95 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1ce68aa2 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new af136483 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e87f8d85 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 6d43518c 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5866e01f 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new c938c7fa 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 412b00b6 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 593006f8 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f9d8e86f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new df9e6bff 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 11162cab 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new f2035915 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new c0a610c5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new a8087160 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 200d6ff9 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 923a6143 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new fb2477a4 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 6cdf46aa 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 49b866d9 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new bce545eb 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 3508589f 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 7ae79b8c 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 34f958a2 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 1a94b873 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new aab73d6c 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 1a3e6eb5 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 1de6b1b4 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 8777e52d 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 838d3dc3 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 17e76086 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 437226a5 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ec96b411 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fce79c5e 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8a0fa69e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4d9569f8 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8b8c7092 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9fdd5658 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new db7626e5 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9e4db255 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e85389db 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 26269d9d 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7853d8be onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d9a3cde3 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8c5684fa onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9e61ee67 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2efed62d onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c3a07265 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 11923871 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a16010c6 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6751e956) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 110 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: