[Tcwg-commits] [toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (a16010c6 -> 2729dd7e)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards a16010c6 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 11923871 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c3a07265 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2efed62d onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9e61ee67 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8c5684fa onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d9a3cde3 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7853d8be onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 26269d9d 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e85389db 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 9e4db255 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards db7626e5 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 9fdd5658 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 8b8c7092 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4d9569f8 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8a0fa69e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fce79c5e 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ec96b411 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 437226a5 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 17e76086 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 838d3dc3 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8777e52d 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1de6b1b4 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 1a3e6eb5 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards aab73d6c 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 1a94b873 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 34f958a2 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 7ae79b8c 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 3508589f 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards bce545eb 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 49b866d9 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 6cdf46aa 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards fb2477a4 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 923a6143 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 200d6ff9 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards a8087160 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards c0a610c5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards f2035915 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 11162cab 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards df9e6bff 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards f9d8e86f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 593006f8 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 412b00b6 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards c938c7fa 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 5866e01f 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 6d43518c 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e87f8d85 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards af136483 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1ce68aa2 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 77dccf95 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1c4a5130 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards f0aeb0ea 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b362b12d 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards bef771ef 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 06211c68 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d897732f 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards db4d7ed0 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 911b57be 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 2250082b 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards dd0ea5d3 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 20afdd58 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 879c2db4 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards a5c969a4 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards a42e4276 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards dc3ab85f 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 85372d19 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards ded75e6a 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards fe0f749a 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d4ce6c58 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards e5838f39 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 073d042d 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards e5c5f8ae 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 5d6ea8c9 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 27c43da9 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 1b99150d 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 5f1fd185 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 9332114e 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards dba5c930 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 71dbb1c3 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 810fb471 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ca45603e 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4f323765 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a2bef4c9 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a87cd46a 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 14f2c157 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 08ea60cf 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 88ce76eb 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards ccf330ee 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 6305b90d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 9bcfae62 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards a954ea04 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 5d8a3406 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f6ad0d0c 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 5e77fe31 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 24ebc8d4 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f8cbd04b 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e3adb1ff 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6b440a47 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards a3ad941b 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards dda90c38 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ce2ead16 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 46b08d74 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6e53b2d4 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 5c5351b0 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards fa20608e 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 43129ea7 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] discards 41236229 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards d7454284 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 4e438505 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new ebe3951d onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a83437d1 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 7e0005d3 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new ac39f6b3 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new a6f64779 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 679da860 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 61b8f38e 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new a85772e1 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fa77029d 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 801f8eab 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7c651701 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 80a27653 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new aa2a0d3c 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0cfde18a 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1e71bfce 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 265424bf 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new dbe3e3b3 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new b7cdf5c9 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new cef7b5a9 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new d74e97f1 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new c26c7ccf 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 73e0f3d8 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 13129604 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new b23ad1ed 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new e2843b42 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 7b3e696e 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 451b0b31 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ca722fe4 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2233e565 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e9d9c203 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 258a7ed5 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new cb69edd9 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 077592ad 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 24affd1f 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 31cad7fd 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 1506d160 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 08e9007e 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new b75b3097 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new d237661a 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 53d10280 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new dab0e501 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new df167e66 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 4914b619 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 060974ae 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 848c40b7 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3455577b 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new c4f5c3eb 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new eb8d8a2d 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 4bed3f8b 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 9b906a76 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 40aab978 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 924e1b2e 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new b9f77d8e 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new e2a9a0bd 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new bb0e9401 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a6ae6b35 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b674b919 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new a0d2348d 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 7b548cc3 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new b223a8eb 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b1e049a8 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 9b1c8be7 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c6b15962 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 5fab4a73 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 328ef06c 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 09dba1ad 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 7992a1d3 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new dfe551cd 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 469cca9b 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ebc7890d 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new ef277d9e 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 3d8193a9 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new c21a657f 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 2ac040a7 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new ae6b39e0 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new f7c16959 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 85524dee 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 19a74021 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 6af038e0 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 8dd178b9 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 4bcaf268 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new c46ac1d7 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new c97c40cc 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 21b4d827 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new c2f31db3 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new c4953160 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 10a45b7c 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 48126f3b 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9213e3e3 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 49585638 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c096cf57 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cdda5a09 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b283793a 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 39ba6dfe 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 80336bb0 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e7156073 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1ea6d7a4 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c4696825 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b2562551 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0e699881 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 5857374c 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0d14a034 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3e275cc9 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0c84b6ed onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 01bf2841 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f7cb7206 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3e96fbb0 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 64af5e3f onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2729dd7e onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a16010c6) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 109 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: