This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 255d640db7 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8a5afd8696 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8db7f9b456 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 9de2fab9e6 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 6d60e345b4 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 72104324c5 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1d30a5ea13 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 547bc33188 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 2929907f40 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards ebcc5afd79 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 531ea1a318 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4658bb2adb 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c75e095f7b 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 81bc126590 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 159f6daf66 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 81db390d71 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c3281c2c6c 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 59fe31052d 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards d10e2bf547 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 34e634c833 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7e1dc0e965 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards ad9336e43e 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1edfd8f6a7 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 659fdea07f 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a50826a38a 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0ebabd6f6d 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 2cccf4dfec 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards b58abedb90 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards 5ad6d377a1 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 647a3ff0e8 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards d8ae47a32e 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 3ca54268f6 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards ea5532f671 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 04009577e9 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards 61fea19426 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 92a20d916c 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards b3b6af1675 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 2f4dff69f0 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 6bb1cb1214 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 81bb809ef7 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 505a04be27 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 1c19e49a49 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 497b10e2ad 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 680f0e7a01 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 76c861919c 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1b20fd52fd 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e2e970c217 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3a2f76b5b3 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fd438d54ca 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards a5dbf7318a 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 316c5831b0 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards d2af81e017 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards b44ac1f587 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 92d43df215 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 109a40c366 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 87c04cf6e5 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6697f429da 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 7180bcc5bd 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 2163a52c98 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 75cc0de8ae 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8d012f3550 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards db627eec78 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards c735d43ecb 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 2a61411232 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards c131a3d776 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards aa225411dd 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards eaedf100a5 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5d8027019f 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards d4e6265f07 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards a8b067b638 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 296e9c8ad0 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards 2bdc31abec 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 867a9f55de 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 87d54f4f89 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards f90decb972 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 3ae73026f4 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 29d2a35904 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 42a3f25830 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ca3b88fc2a 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 57b902181d 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards e8acdca7e5 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 5fa4296a83 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards b4d85586c2 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 985b1a5bca 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0c9e662b0b 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b8074716ce 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 081a1b847a 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 3bafcb31db 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards cad13bad0d 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 49ddc84159 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards f65735f80b 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 66f3e0227d 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 945814e733 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 111dde5246 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 745653b6cc 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2265a3841c 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 8211cbc810 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 2a9c50fe78 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards f2419028f2 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards becc91fcf6 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2db19f79fe 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d673abcc24 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ae65e52d84 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1e26b524c7 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new 7e28604744 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 6128bee59f 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new a85af1a7cf 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 355966732c 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0a379c022f 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new c4601e61fc 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 2d95f68573 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new b8c0a0d88a 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d323d3c957 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 2ed76cd947 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 72b55b0ef0 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new e69c9e8f6f 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 96b0393900 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 770e461118 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 10a91d2026 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 783653508c 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new aa5a718521 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new c0129b775a 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new dee3805a22 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 5a086b6379 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f47406d4cd 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c45b63a9aa 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new cffa266c98 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 3782cc388b 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new 38ac3e6038 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 57c41dd4f9 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new fb18df0e9f 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new c57df7cc25 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 01146a6666 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new 8558fc18ac 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new f342d0f548 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 7b1061890f 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 23f891a7cd 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new b89ab0e684 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 8baf560182 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 6a8bded33d 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 39d04bf8f4 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new d673f9e642 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 467b3b7111 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b2c835e1ba 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 28bf41ce30 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 8e878c10b3 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new fc15f0c0ec 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 85a0db938a 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 91984eb442 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new a8ec66460d 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new cd21aacdc8 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 4e593c2538 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 71a242e33d 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new dbf4f88ba0 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5517749a56 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new aed7d419cb 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 54ddb37064 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a91ec69ade 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f9eb1920ad 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 721c859c5a 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new eab357f8b3 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 9e61f0bdda 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new b6a819451b 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new f359b758f0 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new f196cdc82b 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new c4c61c0b98 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 564cff4371 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new afb8506027 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 04cfb6c0d2 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new 5822576e16 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 0ab82f7307 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 5fb86978f6 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 1e18f87e31 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 171718f3f5 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new aa1d76efb6 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new a55497702c 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new f81d20c57b 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 81b389408b 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 40c81e2883 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6d161521c7 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2f71e7738d 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d79c37f23f 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 6ecd459022 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 40c73b37dc 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 8a7af217ef 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new a9338e0a3b 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 306438295f 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9c03584f1a 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 15a8d194ef 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a561470822 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3c1e074a2d 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ec493c1114 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 728cc78a64 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 99c42683d1 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new a30bff90c8 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new a6a9c0c0ec 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f84c113a5a 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new feca91ccf5 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 8b85fcbb54 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 4ca2d52d78 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new daec3c6f34 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c4aacf3502 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6ccf5dfad4 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (255d640db7) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2192 -> 2216 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2460 -> 2492 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 26992 -> 28044 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90344 -> 90620 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8416 -> 7628 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233016 -> 234784 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 210920 -> 215536 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 148 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 146 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4168 -> 4156 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 174 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 18568 -> 17500 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 4 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 3 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 8 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 48 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- {mail => notify}/check-regression-status.txt | 0 results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 237 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2768 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 770652 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 760870 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30358 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 936 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2965 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3295 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 762340 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 764791 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30616 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1122 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 135 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3161 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3298 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 9 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2960 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3326 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 766825 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 769290 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30328 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 1268 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2961 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3295 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 762340 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 764791 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30616 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1122 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 135 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3433 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3902 +- results_id | 2 +- 65 files changed, 3130175 insertions(+), 3155935 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff rename {mail => notify}/check-regression-status.txt (100%)