This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards ef90d61c1 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f79a0b7e4 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c01ceb1e8 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 93dea4a5f onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b90a6a494 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3dd480174 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d19346063 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a178cf988 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0b23d8cf5 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6f3d7b397 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards be2c0ba09 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 066da1ae8 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e34ebf043 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a6266b810 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 595a54677 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 997cd7c4d 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 52646b07b 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2d7e32c24 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e0bfb6a76 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0bf9e2d99 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5c75e6a43 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fd7f8108d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ae3e93e93 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards aa94ac055 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 401922dc1 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards b83750636 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 9d1ce37af 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ff0ecc2a3 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards ef2a255cf 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 52a59e8ac 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 7a81e27a7 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards dbbc4d57b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards cdc06e6fd 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 72ca6e042 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards fe3c66029 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards bab5575df 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 741361a22 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 96833e8c8 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 7ef14d6b5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 70296e269 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 6fb210074 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards b84e724af 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 9241575bc 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 38dc48d3e 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a8ad007ac 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 478db0608 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 746db5f58 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 086b36eb2 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5a29d8119 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 73b5be537 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a6cc2e854 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 930e7edee 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 02b3f78e6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 4c64e2831 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ffffd4a87 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards fa1b0bf2a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 83e034d47 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 64b23cd46 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards a03091b1d 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards debb963a0 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 1989eb63d 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards d86631452 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards d61624c1b 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 3c279fa3f 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards acc86edad 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards e357ce555 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards a728e4716 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 9854de53e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards fdf4bee0d 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards e6d742906 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards b73aa5af9 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 60030cda0 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards bb8a998ba 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 2b5a95a0c 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 7926ee7a2 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 0d74a184b 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 0e2284b3a 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards a504bfb8a 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 667a8056c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 2fbb376f2 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3d30d99c6 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 1bffc036f 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 49983382a 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards da3726dd9 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 910089e32 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dd804f01c 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards bcc2cc4a5 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 7a27e169b 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards c757e6a23 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 311854ae4 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 48f0776b8 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards ddab82595 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 95be69172 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 5e0f10166 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 3aec9389e 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 5155672ca 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 932d5b3d3 onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 6bae1595d 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new c95978f7b 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5f9727041 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 64cb8d534 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 7dca7015e 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 0cdad0dd5 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new e82acbb7f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 8df69276b 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 8bcea2fdd 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new b360dc230 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 89e97eaa5 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0ab72b89a 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4c8a74f15 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c9313dfcb 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 577c7798d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 987279f1a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 022f0e65c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 4957ca2d2 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new b1269d1c3 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new aafa7701d 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 7931fc7fa 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 72505d4ca 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 53b5bc6c4 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 0eff9ca4a 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new fe7f405d3 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 872e73466 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 1c0a7809d 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 14fd79eb7 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 2b112870b 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 0a440cad9 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new de56f489c 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 363a7b497 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 0ae646c5d 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 27dfc50dc 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 31f8061b6 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new f350e90b8 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 31c67f03b 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3d2d07dc6 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 50a18074e 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 2f254ab79 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 4158b6018 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new d069a985d 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 99733719c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new e9f420323 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 710abcf06 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 5ccdc98de 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b8dbb110c 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 44677b9fc 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 23d13fd23 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 8a351182c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 17c6bfd87 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 3f17c49f3 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 243374a9f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8188d52fd 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 1f1c4ea9b 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 2e3a53ff4 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 898b81033 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 69bf8a9ec 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new beaae36d8 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new f5c4b783f 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 7fc5e52db 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new f57bcf03c 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new fbb303fe7 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new fdc2aa9e7 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 92d6cce81 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 5f3637adf 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 52c6ac99d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new d6fca4645 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 587350491 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new d9fad5a06 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 71ceb1c54 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 90a2ea3a0 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3e8d978af 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e97e60ca8 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a0d827a8f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9b68f3581 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a60eb4fbb 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new eca105fef 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new eb32bfbaf 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e45815292 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 33f739202 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 665366ba7 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ba4d19481 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6ceadb1a1 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f62516ddd 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new fa89e2126 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6e2479f91 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d8932bc9d onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 48a71ced4 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 76aebcf1b onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8da27ff90 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8aaa899a3 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d0d378a9c onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c41a5a229 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1e5ae86be onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (ef90d61c1) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 96 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: