[Tcwg-commits] [toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (a4389dac -> 6751e956)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards a4389dac onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards fb583067 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 422f0cf1 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f29e848e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a2315408 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4c45a1fe onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8a90ae3b onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 851b5db7 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b1f04479 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ca1722e4 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3761c5a7 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d191a93d 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d5414594 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards de47e4e4 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 34867ed0 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6a102e2c 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 44108946 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5f21223e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 753951fe 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 558cc5d8 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d1b96e45 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3d1d0153 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c2fb9840 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 88afa3c5 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards e2e31ec3 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e4cbe4da 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards d6972eb7 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 9fe370fa 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards e348c91a 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 4b13713c 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 5abdab9c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 015fb510 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards d44b9fc2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 9cb42033 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 6e9a310f 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards a676209b 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 531514e0 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 03dacd18 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 344a237f 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 179f932f 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 72292a2a 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 76a855a4 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 823e1cd0 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 52f9b075 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards b79b9fb6 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 6a52d9d7 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 48128d30 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 9b65f50c 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 255780bb 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards fc76bf3b 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 15a84aa5 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards ff27ff44 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ff29b94b 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 25351a54 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 2d014b19 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards a2ffb285 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 84f1383c 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards fb815bea 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards f21b1cf2 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 902d50ed 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4ea60895 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards f51314a1 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards dedda822 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 3db85077 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 3df97c38 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 34f6ecd6 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards f112938a 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 1cf2e573 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards fb7a7532 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards c70fbe32 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 6209a3f6 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards ffff4d5f 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 379beaf0 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 3c7e4841 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 7f55b697 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards ac904ea9 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 789406dd 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 6936d422 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cb407c00 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards ab03c2e7 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1894f08d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 41041965 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 174728b7 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7410d8eb 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 4859937c 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 1802d7ce 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards f0e2847f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 9c4cb36b 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards f6e8796f 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 679aeb09 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 11e28341 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 712facf5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 4fb34629 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 55db7152 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 5d76d220 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 959a7e79 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2a30e83a 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0a5f9f51 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 323265a8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards e46aa7a1 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 68413c40 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5db6ffae 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cf56c0e5 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards a7d526c0 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1e4713a4 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b0b6cc25 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] discards b9ab8e5a 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards d4221b3a 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 65dd81b9 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 30c95855 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 73d8a091 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] new e2857623 onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b0d863f0 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new e1954857 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 33c75345 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 7061649e 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new f3ed55de 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new 475316f0 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b7f52edd 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 8a7c65d1 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 7214c345 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 48f17e59 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 54c62052 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dc330aeb 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 1b338897 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 15db25e7 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 46ef631c 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4ec75d9c 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5e5dc14e 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 8d5e1a2c 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 00c6eae5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 91a8a563 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 5e8958d0 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new e787effc 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 67199ada 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 5afff72c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 6ad3b11e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 083839ae 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 207024ac 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 3faf3eda 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5056fc5e 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 52cf0693 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 47b0946e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9680842d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 03190190 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 12b86a83 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 9cf7885a 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 8828bc11 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0d36aee4 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 9499f338 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 2f58b2ed 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new cdebbbf9 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new f94bee22 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new d67595a0 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new a2e61be4 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a9686744 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 1dd8e123 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 9c55ecca 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d4259a92 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 4c77f2f5 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 92af2dcf 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 6d0d1825 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new df80e6b1 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 365a9704 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 66102b86 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new ff7e4fee 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 4f50bddf 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new ee1d2099 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 0cdaf85f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new dc12cec5 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e54719e8 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e1ce33de 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 882cb38a 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 64adb53d 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 5754f0b8 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ae4059d1 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 57553120 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b2c870bc 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new b32759a0 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 4af750d2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 28bed546 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 18934700 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 227b4b28 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 3e2b76a3 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 540ccc60 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 4bc0a7f5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 36bf87ad 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new bd5ec0b2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new d81ff959 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new b42413ce 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new ce72f2be 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new f24162f1 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 2d67636b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new a0824850 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 2107c730 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 64b27ca2 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 5fa70649 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 3ded1d3e 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ac76c558 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 58ce7390 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new e5889583 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 82dcfb88 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new af65e08b 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8c997ca7 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fe377c11 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 47776d2a 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 03799ee5 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 60006eb5 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5591f7c3 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e9d76518 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d506bbb3 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a8ba03a8 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new adbb5977 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 12182297 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cca8eb87 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7d729fa5 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 969a78b7 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 68d84bf3 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new df2b1c72 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 78a8b1d6 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4afa19a0 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6751e956 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a4389dac) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 111 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: