This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 1a6b7b8015 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 60f4cd66dc 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards bbec40a7e8 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3081a186ee 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4626b1b804 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 37f937a95f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4692528938 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 26af3edc89 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards dd3864e3bb 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 1c96b82643 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 38d67f86eb 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] discards 43224f28f3 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 52a21ed03c 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 064f083b9b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards d1962bbf8a 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] discards 6b773096b4 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] discards 8aec5d6994 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 469307f4ae 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards b4e6a415c0 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 9f7d94194b 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 930dfae339 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards ebfc69d1ea 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] discards 540e64ce84 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 188ad1761b 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] discards a2a1063394 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards b8ec7c0cde 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 155d9235fa 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 52fb9f8991 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d35ae960b6 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ede3a8c412 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 5569426326 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards ed2245d801 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 8769e87c93 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3f16dca61e 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 97854e93a2 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 320bf5f94e 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] discards a941616c9b 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a077d5553a 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 01a302e84e 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 383967947b 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 6881bc60d2 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f0f18d5d70 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 40f07b4cfd 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 3312d49dd6 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 016370e2b8 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 803ea58d05 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards e3a317cc15 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8eb06e1036 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards bd21700834 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] discards d7c4db40c9 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 2f2d133e17 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 2ac8081617 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards c88b271f0c 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards abfadbc493 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 44460a8d49 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 80b9f2d245 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 7d5aa494f6 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] discards 6b1e257f94 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards c2c3683ce1 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 7e34f15082 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] discards 90e6eb27de 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 9f49050c52 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 8527795707 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards a5549c525a 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 45b4968b19 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 049dd44998 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5a4bde4db0 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b9a32c5f4d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 402b94efe4 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 83fb19e3f9 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2cee4128b6 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 8a33102bc8 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 7a89e2fcd9 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards f43f7b0811 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 2b0f29ede1 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards da04a2c538 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 27142dc4f4 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards de71d47226 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2c1cb11fba 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 00a818e7be 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] discards b3563d2196 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards dce0bc4709 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8690152a40 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 09c91c672d 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4712378386 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] discards 7b57300043 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 24a437bb51 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1f5e5bc696 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bcd306635e 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ba2c85759d 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 6ad245f6af 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 2d836ede9e 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b4be672028 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards 894c57dd51 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards af455c4cab 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 1890fa431a 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards c2dd23d850 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 0941c0ee5c 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] discards c57c1094e2 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 222d5cb384 1: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 76da6b8c31 0: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 6bc5df155e 0: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new f9b242b551 1: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 56d658262e 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new b61fc0a051 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new 68215917ee 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 96def7c02a 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 204033ba0f 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 1ff5eb788a 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 2a01ea4cae 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new 7a1f03c7b0 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 01d69afb2f 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new b6d15c9b95 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new b85bd04b37 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f48e0c4f58 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 56f5c6d3d6 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6afc6846c9 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 922ac46ceb 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] new 9eee0514ca 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7ca6595900 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new fd738e0e4b 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1fcfcff9db 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 3293d85636 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] new 37f4c4188d 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 3ce4bc37c1 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5082230aa0 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 97a4149ba2 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 81a31fb9ae 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4cd242033c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 9179520aed 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new b542b742d5 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new e8a1bacd66 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0ee83b60af 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6742068049 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6de167c1d9 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c439b15445 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 82ea6005ca 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 060ef5ef8f 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 41c444a303 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3e8b112d0e 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 7f1c8e2634 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 40cba34463 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new f1a50ef3a9 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] new 9aa61b0aa0 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 1321fbc420 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new cffa5ea847 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] new d84966cc27 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new e73311bbc6 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 63943127d1 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new f2eb3c676d 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new 18a8571f85 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new c2a6cac623 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new ce01433bd6 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e875c24f42 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] new bfc4dcc0ec 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 235b7fb457 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d8fc65e1a0 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 8fb3286545 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 0be836653e 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 183ee6608a 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 94c5707b9a 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 917665c1f2 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0659e14956 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 2a0fcf1e11 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 10d465ba4e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 025e82c866 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d9fccd2314 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] new 48d8e1dad3 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 8317050bba 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 558551aeb9 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b91045ff28 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 3f9af93542 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 62f19bf9a2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 73ea43c099 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d9fb4b1b0f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4ba2c7bab4 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 72ffbede8b 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 6c47606d30 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 73ff1347ed 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] new ac3e39e25a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new f9c921cddf 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] new 174171715b 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d6c92ed318 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new c3ae7bf7b1 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] new 9439669c59 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new d32a745f28 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6115884fcf 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] new fac94458a4 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] new 1d463b3d34 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 0e98bc1660 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new c51efdf7bf 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 1c9a1b3ab4 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] new 040c467d56 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new b062f8e8d0 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 426b3678e8 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7dcd978861 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e41f2503fa 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d2ad63dcd4 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f662794396 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 98cd8f3d2e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 668f502870 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 684deba667 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f91e999c37 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (1a6b7b8015) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2236 -> 2120 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2508 -> 2452 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28216 -> 28088 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90912 -> 90548 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8404 -> 8544 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234060 -> 233388 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 213700 -> 212512 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 201 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 199 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4108 -> 4136 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 21 - 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 7644 -> 7612 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 - 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 4 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 + 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 1 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 46 +- mail/check-regression-status.txt | 2 +- mail/exe.improvement | 1 - mail/exe.regression | 1 + manifest.sh | 22 +- results | 1 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 76 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 32 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 187 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 73188 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 727621 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 19286 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 354 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 38 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 189 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 80 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3250 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 188 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 76500 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 471016 ++++++------ results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 9374 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 304 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 32 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 187 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 73188 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 727621 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 19286 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 354 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 207 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3820 +- results_id | 2 +- 59 files changed, 1071465 insertions(+), 1135948 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions delete mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement create mode 100644 mail/exe.regression