Tcwg-commits September 2023

tcwg-commits@lists.linaro.org

5 participants
22766 discussions

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate/gnu-arm-master-O3] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate/gnu-arm-master-O3 updated (641560f -> 59586b5)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate/gnu-arm-master-O3. from 641560f onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 59586b5 onsuccess: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2608 -> 2328 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2660 -> 2644 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27428 -> 27356 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17768 -> 17612 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 93148 -> 91728 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 72616 -> 72356 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8712 -> 8756 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234404 -> 234088 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185736 -> 185792 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 217332 -> 216404 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 183652 -> 183860 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 34 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3368 -> 3308 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 5624 -> 5736 bytes annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 985 +++++++-- jenkins/notify-init.log | 157 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 18 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 12 +- manifest.sh | 8 +- notify/jira/comment-template.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 24 +- notify/mail-recipients.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 164 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 174 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 2023 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 2527 ++++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 244 +-- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 6 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 2014 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 2477 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 230 +-- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 6 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 50 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 2201 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 174 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 174 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 10 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 174 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2486 +++++++++++----------- 45 files changed, 8538 insertions(+), 7966 deletions(-) -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (6751e956 -> a16010c6)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards 6751e956 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 4afa19a0 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 78a8b1d6 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards df2b1c72 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 68d84bf3 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 969a78b7 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7d729fa5 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cca8eb87 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 12182297 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards adbb5977 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a8ba03a8 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d506bbb3 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e9d76518 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5591f7c3 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 60006eb5 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 03799ee5 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 47776d2a 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fe377c11 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8c997ca7 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards af65e08b 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 82dcfb88 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e5889583 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 58ce7390 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards ac76c558 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 3ded1d3e 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 5fa70649 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 64b27ca2 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 2107c730 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards a0824850 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 2d67636b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards f24162f1 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards ce72f2be 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards b42413ce 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards d81ff959 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards bd5ec0b2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 36bf87ad 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 4bc0a7f5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 540ccc60 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 3e2b76a3 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 227b4b28 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 18934700 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 28bed546 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4af750d2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards b32759a0 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards b2c870bc 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 57553120 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ae4059d1 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 5754f0b8 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 64adb53d 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 882cb38a 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e1ce33de 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards e54719e8 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards dc12cec5 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 0cdaf85f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ee1d2099 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 4f50bddf 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards ff7e4fee 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 66102b86 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 365a9704 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards df80e6b1 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6d0d1825 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 92af2dcf 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 4c77f2f5 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards d4259a92 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 9c55ecca 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 1dd8e123 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards a9686744 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards a2e61be4 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d67595a0 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards f94bee22 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards cdebbbf9 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 2f58b2ed 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 9499f338 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 0d36aee4 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 8828bc11 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 9cf7885a 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 12b86a83 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 03190190 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9680842d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 47b0946e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 52cf0693 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5056fc5e 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3faf3eda 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 207024ac 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 083839ae 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 6ad3b11e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 5afff72c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 67199ada 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards e787effc 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 5e8958d0 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 91a8a563 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 00c6eae5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 8d5e1a2c 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 5e5dc14e 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 4ec75d9c 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 46ef631c 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 15db25e7 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1b338897 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards dc330aeb 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 54c62052 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 48f17e59 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7214c345 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8a7c65d1 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards b7f52edd 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 475316f0 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f3ed55de 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] discards 7061649e 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 33c75345 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards e1954857 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards b0d863f0 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 8fe1c632 onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4e438505 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new d7454284 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 41236229 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 43129ea7 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new fa20608e 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5c5351b0 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6e53b2d4 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 46b08d74 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ce2ead16 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dda90c38 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a3ad941b 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 6b440a47 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new e3adb1ff 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f8cbd04b 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 24ebc8d4 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5e77fe31 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new f6ad0d0c 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 5d8a3406 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a954ea04 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 9bcfae62 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 6305b90d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new ccf330ee 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 88ce76eb 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 08ea60cf 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 14f2c157 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new a87cd46a 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new a2bef4c9 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4f323765 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ca45603e 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 810fb471 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 71dbb1c3 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new dba5c930 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9332114e 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 5f1fd185 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 1b99150d 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 27c43da9 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 5d6ea8c9 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new e5c5f8ae 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 073d042d 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new e5838f39 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new d4ce6c58 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new fe0f749a 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new ded75e6a 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 85372d19 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new dc3ab85f 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new a42e4276 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new a5c969a4 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 879c2db4 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 20afdd58 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new dd0ea5d3 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2250082b 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 911b57be 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new db4d7ed0 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d897732f 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 06211c68 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new bef771ef 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b362b12d 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f0aeb0ea 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1c4a5130 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 77dccf95 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1ce68aa2 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new af136483 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e87f8d85 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 6d43518c 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5866e01f 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new c938c7fa 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 412b00b6 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 593006f8 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f9d8e86f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new df9e6bff 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 11162cab 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new f2035915 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new c0a610c5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new a8087160 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 200d6ff9 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 923a6143 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new fb2477a4 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 6cdf46aa 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 49b866d9 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new bce545eb 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 3508589f 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 7ae79b8c 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 34f958a2 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 1a94b873 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new aab73d6c 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 1a3e6eb5 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 1de6b1b4 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 8777e52d 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 838d3dc3 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 17e76086 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 437226a5 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ec96b411 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fce79c5e 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8a0fa69e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4d9569f8 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8b8c7092 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9fdd5658 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new db7626e5 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9e4db255 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e85389db 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 26269d9d 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7853d8be onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d9a3cde3 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8c5684fa onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9e61ee67 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2efed62d onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c3a07265 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 11923871 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a16010c6 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6751e956) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 110 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (a4389dac -> 6751e956)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards a4389dac onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards fb583067 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 422f0cf1 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f29e848e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a2315408 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4c45a1fe onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8a90ae3b onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 851b5db7 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b1f04479 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ca1722e4 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3761c5a7 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d191a93d 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d5414594 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards de47e4e4 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 34867ed0 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6a102e2c 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 44108946 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5f21223e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 753951fe 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 558cc5d8 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d1b96e45 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3d1d0153 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c2fb9840 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 88afa3c5 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards e2e31ec3 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e4cbe4da 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards d6972eb7 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 9fe370fa 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards e348c91a 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 4b13713c 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 5abdab9c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 015fb510 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards d44b9fc2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 9cb42033 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 6e9a310f 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards a676209b 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 531514e0 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 03dacd18 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 344a237f 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 179f932f 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 72292a2a 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 76a855a4 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 823e1cd0 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 52f9b075 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards b79b9fb6 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 6a52d9d7 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 48128d30 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 9b65f50c 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 255780bb 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards fc76bf3b 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 15a84aa5 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards ff27ff44 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ff29b94b 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 25351a54 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 2d014b19 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards a2ffb285 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 84f1383c 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards fb815bea 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards f21b1cf2 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 902d50ed 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4ea60895 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards f51314a1 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards dedda822 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 3db85077 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 3df97c38 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 34f6ecd6 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards f112938a 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 1cf2e573 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards fb7a7532 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards c70fbe32 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 6209a3f6 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards ffff4d5f 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 379beaf0 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 3c7e4841 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 7f55b697 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards ac904ea9 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 789406dd 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 6936d422 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cb407c00 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards ab03c2e7 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1894f08d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 41041965 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 174728b7 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7410d8eb 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 4859937c 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 1802d7ce 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards f0e2847f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 9c4cb36b 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards f6e8796f 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 679aeb09 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 11e28341 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 712facf5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 4fb34629 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 55db7152 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 5d76d220 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 959a7e79 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2a30e83a 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0a5f9f51 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 323265a8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards e46aa7a1 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 68413c40 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5db6ffae 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cf56c0e5 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards a7d526c0 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1e4713a4 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b0b6cc25 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] discards b9ab8e5a 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards d4221b3a 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 65dd81b9 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 30c95855 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 73d8a091 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] new e2857623 onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b0d863f0 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new e1954857 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 33c75345 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 7061649e 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new f3ed55de 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new 475316f0 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b7f52edd 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 8a7c65d1 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 7214c345 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 48f17e59 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 54c62052 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dc330aeb 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 1b338897 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 15db25e7 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 46ef631c 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4ec75d9c 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5e5dc14e 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 8d5e1a2c 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 00c6eae5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 91a8a563 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 5e8958d0 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new e787effc 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 67199ada 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 5afff72c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 6ad3b11e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 083839ae 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 207024ac 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 3faf3eda 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5056fc5e 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 52cf0693 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 47b0946e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9680842d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 03190190 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 12b86a83 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 9cf7885a 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 8828bc11 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0d36aee4 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 9499f338 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 2f58b2ed 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new cdebbbf9 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new f94bee22 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new d67595a0 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new a2e61be4 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a9686744 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 1dd8e123 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 9c55ecca 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d4259a92 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 4c77f2f5 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 92af2dcf 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 6d0d1825 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new df80e6b1 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 365a9704 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 66102b86 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new ff7e4fee 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 4f50bddf 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new ee1d2099 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 0cdaf85f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new dc12cec5 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e54719e8 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e1ce33de 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 882cb38a 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 64adb53d 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 5754f0b8 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ae4059d1 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 57553120 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b2c870bc 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new b32759a0 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 4af750d2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 28bed546 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 18934700 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 227b4b28 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 3e2b76a3 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 540ccc60 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 4bc0a7f5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 36bf87ad 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new bd5ec0b2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new d81ff959 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new b42413ce 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new ce72f2be 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new f24162f1 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 2d67636b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new a0824850 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 2107c730 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 64b27ca2 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 5fa70649 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 3ded1d3e 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ac76c558 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 58ce7390 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new e5889583 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 82dcfb88 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new af65e08b 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8c997ca7 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fe377c11 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 47776d2a 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 03799ee5 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 60006eb5 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5591f7c3 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e9d76518 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d506bbb3 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a8ba03a8 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new adbb5977 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 12182297 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cca8eb87 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7d729fa5 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 969a78b7 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 68d84bf3 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new df2b1c72 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 78a8b1d6 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4afa19a0 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6751e956 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a4389dac) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 111 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3 updated (66c5c664e -> 548f592bd)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3. discards 66c5c664e onsuccess: #98: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 765b219c6 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c1ae073f4 onsuccess: #95: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e6fa47446 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 20a1c4915 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0dd9650ac onsuccess: #92: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e36571562 onsuccess: #91: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5135540a5 onsuccess: #90: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 66826edf8 onsuccess: #89: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2aecc0771 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 31649a27d onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4697690fb onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6e24f7ba7 force: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 391b13bca force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 0bdcd83e4 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d43c95bf8 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5c9ea92a0 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4234df043 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a01b8e176 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1314082a6 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f8fce140d onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 229bceaa7 force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards f9cd48a52 force: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 27d5bdf47 89: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3399b80f2 88: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 74268b44a 87: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 16b4f1bff 86: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d554ffdbb 85: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 13564e08e 84: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d501ada57 83: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f70d8ba8e 82: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8d1365732 81: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f4b450d48 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a7451a01a 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0a14d26f4 78: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d8b946192 77: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b9a92530a 76: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 02c6abf9d 75: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] discards 466d98c2e 74: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 5795ec80c 73: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards 456b4c58c 72: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 26 commits discards b14ecb55b 71: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 52 [...] discards 5f9e94460 70: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] discards 8643dfb34 69: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards dd9ffe271 68: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 10501cf0a 67: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 49 commits discards 7cbf74f07 66: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards 6aa9d384c 65: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16915 [...] discards 60889d4ab 64: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 60 commits discards 1136efe1b 63: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 16 [...] discards 9236cf58a 62: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards b265e3735 61: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 8e35d359c 60: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: n [...] discards 7532a925a 59: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 2 commits discards 90103f7ac 58: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4f010d28e 57: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3a4797a62 56: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] discards 0d1e0a57b 55: force: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] powf@@GLIBC_2.27 slo [...] discards 60ecedf99 54: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.12-4559 [...] discards 7970df7b5 53: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 19 commits discards 2d0886ee7 52: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 168 commits discards 0cdbf418c 51: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] discards 936fdd42f 50: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f40b81953 49: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 36 commits discards 629328285 48: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards 6e28d5162 47: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2d7de6107 46: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits discards 82beb674f 45: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 547 commits discards 64ca5b598 44: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards a9e7e81e6 43: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards c02ada027 42: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 87f3dd635 41: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards c1fc0acad 40: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 13 commits discards 625071c22 39: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after g [...] discards 0ed5fd81e 38: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards daa38a136 37: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards fd5af745a 36: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d3e14728e 35: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.17-41685 [...] discards 9c8cd62cc 34: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.90 [...] discards c08ebd5a8 33: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards 095e45e49 32: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 33 commits discards 0b573b22a 31: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by - [...] discards 05eaca6a2 30: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 34c04a0f8 29: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 83557d08d 28: force: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 3180229e1 27: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9cc974a23 26: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 92 commits discards b05f14e32 25: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards aa45a232a 24: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4463047f8 23: onsuccess: #481: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bbdb4c0ec 22: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 701497d9a 21: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2d069912e 20: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fa0fd8bb2 19: onsuccess: #477: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8231991f4 onsuccess: #477: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 5787fdd78 20: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 90914a2f9 21: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5f4aa3258 22: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0533a6b9b 23: onsuccess: #481: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b5ce1a487 24: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d7827dfed 25: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 50366c419 26: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 92 commits new 2b764db9a 27: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new eef20a2ca 28: force: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 324f972c3 29: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new cc4b473c7 30: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 299ce9a12 31: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by - [...] new 94eea228e 32: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 33 commits new f6bfa3754 33: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new 13ac9be85 34: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.90 [...] new 6d7018c73 35: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.17-41685 [...] new 76984c093 36: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 2a6915616 37: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 77a583bd1 38: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 6e4d8ad94 39: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after g [...] new 52f5c8aa6 40: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 13 commits new 3b138d10f 41: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new d9ad79d0c 42: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new cd09e7b68 43: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new d5fa1fd0f 44: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 3e93b0d71 45: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 547 commits new af9d116f1 46: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits new 88b44118f 47: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1321b3764 48: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new fef8b0a59 49: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 36 commits new 1ca6f569e 50: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d5aa9f67d 51: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] new 19e404f2d 52: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 168 commits new 06a28f870 53: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 19 commits new e78955e97 54: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.12-4559 [...] new 4e4545e0c 55: force: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] powf@@GLIBC_2.27 slo [...] new 72e3cc837 56: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] new 80df2fff4 57: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 31fd1ddfa 58: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e7aa1b0c6 59: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 2 commits new c497244f3 60: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: n [...] new 2386f8ea4 61: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 869161564 62: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ab428a7c5 63: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 16 [...] new ea022534c 64: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 60 commits new 616b6dd43 65: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16915 [...] new 71582b15f 66: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new c244aa7f1 67: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 49 commits new 8e9e4da10 68: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1fe0cc6ba 69: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 235897ec0 70: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] new b0c8b07aa 71: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 52 [...] new fa8667e4a 72: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 26 commits new 38e556083 73: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new cb6f587f3 74: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new d4212ac9b 75: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] new 892aa2108 76: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5f17b9c83 77: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new aad5bada6 78: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 19c818803 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 335b2878e 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9403ed992 81: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6194fb6bf 82: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0b6a01ba2 83: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cec3bdd9e 84: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2a906910c 85: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cd25f9492 86: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 90580bcc7 87: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e2ec842d7 88: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f7e0208a9 89: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ad5459d01 force: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new fcc807662 force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 1bc02f286 onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1471fae9c onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 839e9ed26 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 76837f718 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f3e794555 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cf3259146 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9190f5251 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7d571d616 force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 1a9a8b42c force: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new b93daf18b onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5298d8859 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f0f4f004f onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a3375f594 onsuccess: #89: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 680f8d92e onsuccess: #90: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 15b42d7f6 onsuccess: #91: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3a8b0ee92 onsuccess: #92: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bfaf07e6a onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 92f5f7507 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d6f84c435 onsuccess: #95: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 248bd136b onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 548f592bd onsuccess: #98: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (66c5c664e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 94 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (11fceb46 -> a4389dac)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards 11fceb46 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards de3d0990 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 28b10c3b onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards dcad3538 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cf5eec60 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards db33bb8f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 722873b1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 928a47d1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 36785491 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 47877921 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 99d0527b 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b26194c1 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 29e70fe7 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 80b21e55 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2754778d 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6df36c13 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 593967d1 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b4a20fcf 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3eac1509 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 685d4212 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8f1a928c 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6f8cf020 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d50a0210 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards cc421fa0 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards a6853ea8 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f698f0c1 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards e3facb9d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 39af09b7 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 06f195bc 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 00417477 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 62f7788d 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards e5e31211 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 29555a58 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards ce01daf6 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards c6abd7a7 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 9ca0cdc2 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 89fa04d8 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards b5b30223 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards d53afe32 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards c7a23b3e 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 09555b8d 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 78034b90 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4e486b6f 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards f4cfca2d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards b2252c0c 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards bbf63e90 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2f3b81cb 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 75d7fb2b 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards bdfb6b70 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 622bef29 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 31095dbd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards aedf61d0 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b4b7da5f 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 053f7d63 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ddd09606 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 3a26ef3c 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 877e37bc 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 5dc77920 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 6febda01 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards cf2b5742 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b425e961 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 52efd88e 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 8d773d89 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 399bc00b 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 30af28eb 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards ed17333e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 83c129bf 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 6eee2224 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards f44b75e0 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 099544a4 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards d9ff6861 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 81e99935 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards dfba0363 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 35624058 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 0c166a70 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards b2b4be98 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 891013ac 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards a2f0d885 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 83f64608 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 6c04ea0e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 71b1fa54 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e9882dbb 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4703f067 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards accc08fd 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards d655eb8b 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards f6d8fc1d 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards fbbe1182 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards ebf651d6 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 855745eb 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards e50cfc4b 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards d6606863 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards dcb73763 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e10f8d7a 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 99cc4dcd 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 6c8af3dc 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d66dba71 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d33a7adf 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9a25538f 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 3638888a 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 2aa0a413 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 53f7b220 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0a1aa239 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f7c4a454 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 7bf02121 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2380b1bd 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a73fa17d 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] discards 1ccb7df3 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards c7976089 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards a3c1e163 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards e77aaa39 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards e096d575 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] discards 560b70c8 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 406dd14d Initial empty repository new e0040f8c init: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_c [...] new 73d8a091 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] new 30c95855 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 65dd81b9 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new d4221b3a 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new b9ab8e5a 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new b0b6cc25 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new 1e4713a4 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a7d526c0 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new cf56c0e5 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 5db6ffae 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 68413c40 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e46aa7a1 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 323265a8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 0a5f9f51 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 2a30e83a 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 959a7e79 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5d76d220 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 55db7152 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 4fb34629 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 712facf5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 11e28341 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 679aeb09 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new f6e8796f 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 9c4cb36b 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new f0e2847f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 1802d7ce 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 4859937c 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 7410d8eb 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 174728b7 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 41041965 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1894f08d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ab03c2e7 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new cb407c00 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 6936d422 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 789406dd 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new ac904ea9 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 7f55b697 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 3c7e4841 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 379beaf0 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new ffff4d5f 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 6209a3f6 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new c70fbe32 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new fb7a7532 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 1cf2e573 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new f112938a 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 34f6ecd6 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 3df97c38 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3db85077 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new dedda822 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new f51314a1 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 4ea60895 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 902d50ed 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new f21b1cf2 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new fb815bea 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 84f1383c 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new a2ffb285 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 2d014b19 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 25351a54 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ff29b94b 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new ff27ff44 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 15a84aa5 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new fc76bf3b 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 255780bb 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 9b65f50c 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 48128d30 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 6a52d9d7 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b79b9fb6 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 52f9b075 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 823e1cd0 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 76a855a4 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 72292a2a 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 179f932f 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 344a237f 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 03dacd18 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 531514e0 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new a676209b 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 6e9a310f 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 9cb42033 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new d44b9fc2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 015fb510 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 5abdab9c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 4b13713c 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new e348c91a 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 9fe370fa 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new d6972eb7 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new e4cbe4da 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new e2e31ec3 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 88afa3c5 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new c2fb9840 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 3d1d0153 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d1b96e45 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 558cc5d8 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 753951fe 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5f21223e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 44108946 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6a102e2c 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 34867ed0 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new de47e4e4 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d5414594 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d191a93d 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3761c5a7 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ca1722e4 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b1f04479 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 851b5db7 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8a90ae3b onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4c45a1fe onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a2315408 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f29e848e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 422f0cf1 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fb583067 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a4389dac onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (11fceb46) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 112 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3 updated (382b93858 -> 66c5c664e)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3. discards 382b93858 onsuccess: #98: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 99dbc8495 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9c642692f onsuccess: #95: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e684560bb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cb5fd2553 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 96168fae4 onsuccess: #92: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c6303e764 onsuccess: #91: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f45fd2fee onsuccess: #90: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards da23dcc43 onsuccess: #89: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f1568e074 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 11b27dc65 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1b6e25320 onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a724b42b4 force: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 01c9b12aa force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards cc6888708 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f52c43880 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0017d9c87 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 222164c5b onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 536af09d4 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards afbbde0f5 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 359819bd7 onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 74d6b78a9 force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 365448bd7 force: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 38b48e564 89: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5b249a63e 88: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e4dbe0bee 87: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 25c6193f9 86: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2d7d2fa36 85: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6e9a76dc0 84: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 766d2ff4d 83: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fa9dd57fa 82: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0fc388b69 81: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 63899f551 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f93cb5b4d 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5b09a772f 78: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e670c1513 77: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 37f4ce916 76: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards afd66639f 75: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] discards 43239481a 74: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards c766f6ce5 73: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards 09297c815 72: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 26 commits discards 1549c9c7d 71: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 52 [...] discards a21ba91d6 70: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] discards a636cc5bd 69: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3893a9538 68: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 618803afa 67: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 49 commits discards c62fe1259 66: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards 3117e2705 65: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16915 [...] discards c50d2fb83 64: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 60 commits discards edfacdb08 63: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 16 [...] discards 812252229 62: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 70e084cc7 61: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards a11724b94 60: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: n [...] discards 51f372a7f 59: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 2 commits discards 271ea12dd 58: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards aa54b2181 57: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0f17dc2af 56: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] discards 4fdbd43d8 55: force: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] powf@@GLIBC_2.27 slo [...] discards c9a64610e 54: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.12-4559 [...] discards 4a691a111 53: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 19 commits discards f662e46f7 52: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 168 commits discards 4ce0eea9c 51: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] discards edf4e7852 50: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0a3cb45e7 49: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 36 commits discards 3f4ad2242 48: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards 132e8775d 47: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c3b472df2 46: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits discards 10c5c53cb 45: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 547 commits discards 64180f6ea 44: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 9bd8efb8d 43: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 9cf819870 42: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 39bd5efe3 41: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 607ef95ac 40: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 13 commits discards 1ebcd6751 39: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after g [...] discards 226919c51 38: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 25551a2be 37: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6b975baca 36: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f7f65e724 35: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.17-41685 [...] discards 4f9adead5 34: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.90 [...] discards 34f48c92d 33: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards 7d189172c 32: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 33 commits discards 598401dc5 31: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by - [...] discards ff58f46c3 30: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 99e4dc742 29: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 931234d19 28: force: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f4ed98c15 27: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 42cb09e93 26: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 92 commits discards 7dc36d3fb 25: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards a601b825e 24: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1514eea35 23: onsuccess: #481: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3ac81d99c 22: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 30579cfdd 21: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7440aa494 20: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6f294d4b0 19: onsuccess: #477: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a4394d809 18: force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 1f4062c7e force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new fa0fd8bb2 19: onsuccess: #477: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2d069912e 20: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 701497d9a 21: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bbdb4c0ec 22: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4463047f8 23: onsuccess: #481: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new aa45a232a 24: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b05f14e32 25: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 9cc974a23 26: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 92 commits new 3180229e1 27: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 83557d08d 28: force: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 34c04a0f8 29: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 05eaca6a2 30: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0b573b22a 31: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by - [...] new 095e45e49 32: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 33 commits new c08ebd5a8 33: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new 9c8cd62cc 34: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.90 [...] new d3e14728e 35: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.17-41685 [...] new fd5af745a 36: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new daa38a136 37: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 0ed5fd81e 38: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 625071c22 39: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after g [...] new c1fc0acad 40: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 13 commits new 87f3dd635 41: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new c02ada027 42: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new a9e7e81e6 43: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 64ca5b598 44: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 82beb674f 45: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 547 commits new 2d7de6107 46: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits new 6e28d5162 47: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 629328285 48: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new f40b81953 49: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 36 commits new 936fdd42f 50: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0cdbf418c 51: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] new 2d0886ee7 52: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 168 commits new 7970df7b5 53: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 19 commits new 60ecedf99 54: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.12-4559 [...] new 0d1e0a57b 55: force: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] powf@@GLIBC_2.27 slo [...] new 3a4797a62 56: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] new 4f010d28e 57: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 90103f7ac 58: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7532a925a 59: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 2 commits new 8e35d359c 60: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: n [...] new b265e3735 61: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9236cf58a 62: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1136efe1b 63: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 16 [...] new 60889d4ab 64: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 60 commits new 6aa9d384c 65: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16915 [...] new 7cbf74f07 66: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new 10501cf0a 67: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 49 commits new dd9ffe271 68: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8643dfb34 69: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5f9e94460 70: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] new b14ecb55b 71: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 52 [...] new 456b4c58c 72: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 26 commits new 5795ec80c 73: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new 466d98c2e 74: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 02c6abf9d 75: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] new b9a92530a 76: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d8b946192 77: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0a14d26f4 78: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a7451a01a 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f4b450d48 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8d1365732 81: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f70d8ba8e 82: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d501ada57 83: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 13564e08e 84: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d554ffdbb 85: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 16b4f1bff 86: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 74268b44a 87: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3399b80f2 88: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 27d5bdf47 89: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f9cd48a52 force: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 229bceaa7 force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new f8fce140d onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1314082a6 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a01b8e176 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4234df043 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5c9ea92a0 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d43c95bf8 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0bdcd83e4 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 391b13bca force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 6e24f7ba7 force: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 4697690fb onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 31649a27d onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2aecc0771 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 66826edf8 onsuccess: #89: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5135540a5 onsuccess: #90: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e36571562 onsuccess: #91: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0dd9650ac onsuccess: #92: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 20a1c4915 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e6fa47446 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c1ae073f4 onsuccess: #95: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 765b219c6 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 66c5c664e onsuccess: #98: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (382b93858) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 95 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (a4212baf -> 11fceb46)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. omits a4212baf onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 48b6e098 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits a608e9fe onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits d7d7de40 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 40098a2f onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 169136dd onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 93e95bcc onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 8b711218 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 0f257663 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits a168399c 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 2f856d80 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 4b1d1c45 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 1d17a7a1 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 9808ac67 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits f51a1e7a 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 27148e37 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 4505e801 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 2562fdc5 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits bc464c6f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 32262745 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits a0a7cb2e 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 6eed8e59 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 8d0426ae 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] omits 0d6233da 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] omits d0331fbb 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 92d73670 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] omits da6af0bb 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] omits c571f6ae 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] omits b648a8a9 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] omits 996c7c0e 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits b7a9c81e 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] omits de2d1537 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] omits 8b942ff3 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] omits 31ba88d2 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits d39c8bc0 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits omits b8b48d3c 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] omits 463df96d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] omits d6a734c7 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits omits 4f717d56 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits omits ae0b60be 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 6c08de7f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 5a6c682a 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits f845ba76 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] omits d7fd5036 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 49e942c1 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] omits 978c3662 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 1da38f6e 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] omits 144d26ac 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 23af69e9 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] omits 878bd039 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 496b2554 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 9853a8a3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits d909b75a 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits f914eeda 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits b7473f79 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 910238dd 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] omits 1e48aee3 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 631fd4bb 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 3a0ba3d9 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] omits 2f50df6f 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 643e9161 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 0c294973 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] omits 3e5d1154 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] omits 6fbf5ecd 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] omits 3bbc1510 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 92b85b13 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] omits e2c654dc 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] omits 52186424 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 464f7b5a 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] omits f790d0b8 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits omits e004af3c 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] omits fcff092e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits omits 709a49db 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] omits 628a042f 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] omits 0384e536 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 0ba70631 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] omits aa3feeaf 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 5ba5697a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 9e906e0d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 4685a701 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 8e25340d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits f04e8f72 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 86d98d63 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 2b64e295 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] omits 001faeb0 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] omits 6911e929 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits omits 0f638065 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits omits e926e690 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] omits d6c1eb06 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] omits 7b61d759 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits omits 94287577 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits db8e1dc5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits e2cb4a44 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] omits 5293fc68 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits omits d8a86065 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits d8fb959e 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 1b493736 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 9c9cd515 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] omits 1022fa23 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] omits 234f2ba8 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 3777094e 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits b032e345 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits a7abd487 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] omits eafe47c1 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] omits a9927267 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 7fb2a2be 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] omits 90b6002e 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] omits 9c5d69a4 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] omits 8db4b1a7 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] omits a0ae1e25 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] omits fb141191 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] omits a4c83953 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 omits 3a5c4772 1: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 omits 6bc5df15 0: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 406dd14d Initial empty repository new 560b70c8 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new e096d575 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: 8 [...] new e77aaa39 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new a3c1e163 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new c7976089 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 1ccb7df3 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new a73fa17d 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new 2380b1bd 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7bf02121 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f7c4a454 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 0a1aa239 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 53f7b220 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2aa0a413 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3638888a 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 9a25538f 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new d33a7adf 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d66dba71 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6c8af3dc 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 99cc4dcd 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new e10f8d7a 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new dcb73763 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new d6606863 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new e50cfc4b 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 855745eb 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new ebf651d6 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new fbbe1182 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new f6d8fc1d 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new d655eb8b 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new accc08fd 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 4703f067 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e9882dbb 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 71b1fa54 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6c04ea0e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 83f64608 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new a2f0d885 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 891013ac 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new b2b4be98 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 0c166a70 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 35624058 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new dfba0363 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 81e99935 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new d9ff6861 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 099544a4 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new f44b75e0 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 6eee2224 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 83c129bf 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new ed17333e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 30af28eb 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 399bc00b 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 8d773d89 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 52efd88e 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new b425e961 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new cf2b5742 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6febda01 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 5dc77920 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 877e37bc 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3a26ef3c 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new ddd09606 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 053f7d63 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b4b7da5f 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new aedf61d0 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 31095dbd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 622bef29 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new bdfb6b70 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 75d7fb2b 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2f3b81cb 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new bbf63e90 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b2252c0c 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new f4cfca2d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 4e486b6f 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 78034b90 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 09555b8d 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c7a23b3e 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new d53afe32 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new b5b30223 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 89fa04d8 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 9ca0cdc2 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new c6abd7a7 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new ce01daf6 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 29555a58 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new e5e31211 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 62f7788d 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 00417477 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 06f195bc 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 39af09b7 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new e3facb9d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new f698f0c1 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new a6853ea8 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new cc421fa0 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new d50a0210 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 6f8cf020 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8f1a928c 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 685d4212 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3eac1509 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b4a20fcf 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 593967d1 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6df36c13 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2754778d 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 80b21e55 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 29e70fe7 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b26194c1 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 99d0527b 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 47877921 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 36785491 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 928a47d1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 722873b1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new db33bb8f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cf5eec60 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new dcad3538 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 28b10c3b onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new de3d0990 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 11fceb46 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a4212baf) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 113 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/v0.0_to_v0.1-100/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO created (now a4212baf)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/v0.0_to_v0.1-100/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. at a4212baf onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] No new revisions were added by this update. -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (0d011fb1 -> a4212baf)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. omits 0d011fb1 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 703887a6 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 43d625ac onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 753520e1 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 97ed1137 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 340a950a onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 1c87d4d9 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 0cda9b31 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 25bebad3 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 17b0f415 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits b84afa21 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 70b2537b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits a6b190a6 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits b75ab700 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 6f5d4f64 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits edd27bb1 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits c39ea3d1 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 436cfb8e 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 99b2dedd 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 2f801cb7 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 75efac56 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits f2735211 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] omits 3eac925f 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] omits c30cbcb5 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits b9eb231c 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] omits f03d6d54 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 22580635 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 7467a44a 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] omits 6369d599 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 57c0f14b 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] omits 4db577ef 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] omits fd5c635f 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] omits 593d5eb9 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 6c625baa 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits omits d54eafbb 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] omits 54e915da 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] omits 4beded99 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits omits ccceee9d 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits omits ddaa99e9 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 976a6392 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 5c4c38c3 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits c38984c6 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] omits 7f593a3c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 19fddefd 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] omits c17141c8 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 1b1a3d9a 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] omits 5e5b7da7 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits b2f280fc 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] omits a4e285e3 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits b4e7bacb 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 5e308480 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 106424cb 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 55fdf5cb 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 2ec68c74 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 0a27a6a7 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] omits 3e7c20c4 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 4088ad74 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 2f3e45ee 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] omits b29f551e 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 878b1ddb 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits adc438b2 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] omits aad086dc 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] omits ee410bbe 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] omits 63654a4a 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits c447b71f 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] omits f8c434d0 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] omits 35487562 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 17c9c506 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] omits 065fa97a 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits omits ab62439d 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] omits 388b4b4b 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits omits 835d8ae1 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] omits f17d8497 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] omits ac3b37da 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 3d1c0b16 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] omits aa836e09 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits ea21057a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits b7a6333c 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 9fa8f2b8 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits bc9093e8 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits e8257e17 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits f6cd9d62 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 2a1bb094 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] omits 68554c15 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] omits 034a9c79 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits omits 4c255a6a 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits omits 56063bd3 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] omits 2fa8c98d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] omits 700254d0 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits omits c2a8a300 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 75d8a3f3 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits ef240ecd 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] omits b6a63c3b 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits omits fc0356b2 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 536bd697 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 9ff3076d 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 4d5e0eb2 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] omits d1ff3dde 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] omits eb6035d3 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 4317f132 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3777094e 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 234f2ba8 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1022fa23 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 9c9cd515 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 1b493736 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d8fb959e 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d8a86065 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5293fc68 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new e2cb4a44 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new db8e1dc5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 94287577 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 7b61d759 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new d6c1eb06 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new e926e690 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 0f638065 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 6911e929 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 001faeb0 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 2b64e295 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 86d98d63 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f04e8f72 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8e25340d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4685a701 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9e906e0d 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 5ba5697a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new aa3feeaf 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0ba70631 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 0384e536 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 628a042f 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 709a49db 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new fcff092e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new e004af3c 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new f790d0b8 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 464f7b5a 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 52186424 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new e2c654dc 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 92b85b13 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 3bbc1510 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 6fbf5ecd 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 3e5d1154 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 0c294973 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 643e9161 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 2f50df6f 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3a0ba3d9 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 631fd4bb 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 1e48aee3 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 910238dd 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new b7473f79 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new f914eeda 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d909b75a 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 9853a8a3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 496b2554 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 878bd039 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 23af69e9 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 144d26ac 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1da38f6e 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 978c3662 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 49e942c1 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new d7fd5036 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new f845ba76 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 5a6c682a 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6c08de7f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ae0b60be 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 4f717d56 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new d6a734c7 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 463df96d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new b8b48d3c 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new d39c8bc0 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 31ba88d2 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 8b942ff3 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new de2d1537 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new b7a9c81e 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 996c7c0e 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new b648a8a9 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new c571f6ae 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new da6af0bb 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 92d73670 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new d0331fbb 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 0d6233da 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 8d0426ae 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 6eed8e59 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a0a7cb2e 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 32262745 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bc464c6f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2562fdc5 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4505e801 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 27148e37 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f51a1e7a 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9808ac67 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1d17a7a1 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4b1d1c45 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2f856d80 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a168399c 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0f257663 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 8b711218 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 93e95bcc onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 169136dd onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 40098a2f onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d7d7de40 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a608e9fe onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 48b6e098 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a4212baf onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (0d011fb1) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2556 -> 2624 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2636 -> 2712 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27968 -> 28172 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17720 -> 17636 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92856 -> 94204 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 72484 -> 72544 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8548 -> 7884 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233372 -> 236952 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185476 -> 185976 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 215820 -> 218796 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 184416 -> 184092 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 119 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3468 -> 3496 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 5712 -> 5736 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 108 +- annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 332 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 104 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 24 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/jira/{comments.txt => comment-template.txt} | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 58 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 1732 +- results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 178 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 27644 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 385216 ++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 10509 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 493 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 50 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 176 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 36403 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 532455 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 10509 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 493 - results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 66 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 192 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 32 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4324 +- 52 files changed, 491199 insertions(+), 520444 deletions(-) rename notify/jira/{comments.txt => comment-template.txt} (51%) -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3 updated (982d0e5b3 -> 382b93858)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3. discards 982d0e5b3 onsuccess: #98: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 591d1947b onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 327a69c3f onsuccess: #95: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f78531f35 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3bbdc2cc4 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d7f6872ff onsuccess: #92: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ed96c0a22 onsuccess: #91: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8824a0b09 onsuccess: #90: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f3d5e32f1 onsuccess: #89: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9e6902855 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ee9a0682a onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e16ab6ca8 onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8c4108f0f force: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 00cff4ab3 force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 7756d03b4 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a677be82b onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6356a6090 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 31750a2bd onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c0e94c4d9 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards beaf1c06e onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5d264be67 onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d5b8298d4 force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 7c4b7e4a9 force: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards a60946bcd 89: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 9f3260fa4 88: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7a75a9d9f 87: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4be944cc7 86: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3bf60f86c 85: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5dee8f91d 84: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8b5578311 83: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards df5bcc75e 82: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 27602d6f6 81: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards dfbdbd302 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 53ec90513 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards de1b80202 78: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b540cdd63 77: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e772efa8e 76: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4b5054406 75: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] discards 3153ed765 74: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 072043860 73: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards a34a48b75 72: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 26 commits discards 44e49f452 71: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 52 [...] discards f31b24fec 70: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] discards 40a998ef7 69: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c9fcca5ea 68: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 287881bb9 67: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 49 commits discards a64112193 66: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards a820d5267 65: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16915 [...] discards 79474945f 64: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 60 commits discards b6317cd9e 63: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 16 [...] discards bc28315e3 62: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f4b46d99d 61: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 33be1cc67 60: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: n [...] discards b290c3840 59: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 2 commits discards 15d1368a1 58: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c0c30364f 57: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f94dc97e3 56: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] discards eb66af941 55: force: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] powf@@GLIBC_2.27 slo [...] discards 4faca8f9e 54: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.12-4559 [...] discards 26f4f1282 53: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 19 commits discards c60a12dbc 52: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 168 commits discards 079b23746 51: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] discards 78356d78c 50: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards eddf20e73 49: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 36 commits discards 8017ebd8d 48: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards 718cf3bd0 47: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 29a63a520 46: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits discards c69e9b845 45: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 547 commits discards bdea07c41 44: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 9b7032392 43: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 98f7c90e9 42: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 5d5318f4c 41: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards acc6c26bd 40: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 13 commits discards 0d8ef69fd 39: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after g [...] discards 6df6d76e4 38: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards a694f5398 37: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 585f627e3 36: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 008fc27de 35: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.17-41685 [...] discards 747ec05a2 34: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.90 [...] discards ed698f42d 33: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards 9a280c254 32: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 33 commits discards 711f2056d 31: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by - [...] discards 424a47c20 30: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 17b55b79d 29: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 498dd6461 28: force: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e11fda089 27: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ffb0dc477 26: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 92 commits discards 36e81082a 25: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 945b07f7d 24: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1b91df79c 23: onsuccess: #481: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1596c054a 22: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 59eba2233 21: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 10d2d2109 20: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 23531fc4d 19: onsuccess: #477: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3024eeca9 18: force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 896edcaea 17: onsuccess: #475: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 1882f9335 onsuccess: #475: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a4394d809 18: force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 6f294d4b0 19: onsuccess: #477: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7440aa494 20: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 30579cfdd 21: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3ac81d99c 22: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1514eea35 23: onsuccess: #481: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a601b825e 24: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7dc36d3fb 25: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 42cb09e93 26: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 92 commits new f4ed98c15 27: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 931234d19 28: force: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 99e4dc742 29: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new ff58f46c3 30: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 598401dc5 31: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by - [...] new 7d189172c 32: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 33 commits new 34f48c92d 33: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new 4f9adead5 34: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.90 [...] new f7f65e724 35: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.17-41685 [...] new 6b975baca 36: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 25551a2be 37: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 226919c51 38: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 1ebcd6751 39: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after g [...] new 607ef95ac 40: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 13 commits new 39bd5efe3 41: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 9cf819870 42: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 9bd8efb8d 43: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 64180f6ea 44: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 10c5c53cb 45: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 547 commits new c3b472df2 46: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits new 132e8775d 47: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3f4ad2242 48: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new 0a3cb45e7 49: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 36 commits new edf4e7852 50: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4ce0eea9c 51: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] new f662e46f7 52: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 168 commits new 4a691a111 53: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 19 commits new c9a64610e 54: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.12-4559 [...] new 4fdbd43d8 55: force: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] powf@@GLIBC_2.27 slo [...] new 0f17dc2af 56: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] new aa54b2181 57: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 271ea12dd 58: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 51f372a7f 59: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 2 commits new a11724b94 60: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: n [...] new 70e084cc7 61: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 812252229 62: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new edfacdb08 63: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 16 [...] new c50d2fb83 64: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 60 commits new 3117e2705 65: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16915 [...] new c62fe1259 66: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new 618803afa 67: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 49 commits new 3893a9538 68: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a636cc5bd 69: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a21ba91d6 70: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -4 [...] new 1549c9c7d 71: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 52 [...] new 09297c815 72: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 26 commits new c766f6ce5 73: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new 43239481a 74: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new afd66639f 75: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] new 37f4ce916 76: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e670c1513 77: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5b09a772f 78: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f93cb5b4d 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 63899f551 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0fc388b69 81: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fa9dd57fa 82: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 766d2ff4d 83: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6e9a76dc0 84: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2d7d2fa36 85: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 25c6193f9 86: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e4dbe0bee 87: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5b249a63e 88: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 38b48e564 89: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 365448bd7 force: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 74d6b78a9 force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 359819bd7 onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new afbbde0f5 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 536af09d4 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 222164c5b onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0017d9c87 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f52c43880 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cc6888708 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 01c9b12aa force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new a724b42b4 force: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 1b6e25320 onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 11b27dc65 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f1568e074 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new da23dcc43 onsuccess: #89: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f45fd2fee onsuccess: #90: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c6303e764 onsuccess: #91: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 96168fae4 onsuccess: #92: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cb5fd2553 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e684560bb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9c642692f onsuccess: #95: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 99dbc8495 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 382b93858 onsuccess: #98: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (982d0e5b3) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 96 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

Tcwg-commits September 2023