Tcwg-commits September 2023

tcwg-commits@lists.linaro.org

5 participants
22766 discussions

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (f5245d53a -> 58fd3390c)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards f5245d53a onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f7be59b26 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 8aa7e1739 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 21e604dd4 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0128176bf onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f4e55e23b onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 61699753e onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 611bb033f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 70d0097af onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3e956efb6 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 754c88b68 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 75a59db20 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3eb995a61 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 801b80d81 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5b57f4f7b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards eed08699e 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f2e590d21 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0d30aba71 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6c547cd49 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ee2ebc530 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 00bc20db2 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fb13fe4b7 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 13670bc2d 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 753179758 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f6aff3330 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 36192e143 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 9a1a2ff82 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b6d93fc94 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 8aeb0ddf6 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards b516a322b 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards fac77ad94 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards ca52dbbef 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards b5b854f3a 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards e0ff01877 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 37a9ebb53 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards f45f1d6ed 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards a79972dbb 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 5683fc58b 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 086ac61dd 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards a0d4bde4e 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards c4a2ac16e 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 514208fe0 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 3ddbcca83 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 528269779 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5b5663752 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 2dfc99a2b 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards a2f8fec0c 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards f3774bc22 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0d3c0d391 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards aa7f122eb 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 92bf0fc4f 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 5b9f983f9 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ccfc480d8 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d530300f6 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 01cf861c2 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 4aee0cac9 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ebb0cba56 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 60de5b534 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 134724e03 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 225dd1120 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 31afb988d 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 379c2c914 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards d784598d0 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards bbd39ea01 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 77ae3ba78 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 856cd2325 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards d7f61ebe1 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 937973801 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 76c58c231 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards b083c02dc 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards c20a4790c 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 0020c3247 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 2c2e32bf9 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 5d37ec0b3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards e830849e7 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 4002da31c 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 321493922 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards fa6960fd5 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards e855ee4a2 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 533c9a018 onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 9b182a995 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new a7d37f364 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new cda41cea8 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new e6865ce0c 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 875d8137d 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 4b52bf424 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new e4be4c023 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new e3ae9ad2e 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 3927a6bf8 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a87068ea8 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new e935108e2 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 71cd8e021 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 0b6155f8e 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new cd7f1097c 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new b7b2be94f 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new e73cb6f90 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 5f6641bf5 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b399ec100 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 874962f66 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 34a2d67f5 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 66466fbb9 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 9c42885db 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 5831a88de 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new efeadc565 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 4343f6f4e 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1675d63bd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new ef1996629 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new df423333e 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new c3c58a87c 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 4c06a06ba 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new ac51388ef 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f110ec939 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 906f4edb5 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 2f1b32ea7 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 1dc410b39 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6b596a612 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0f3f35c21 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 9a52464b5 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new eabd8a9ef 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new f07b3bdfd 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 882e90d50 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 0c258f6f7 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 8955887ad 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new bebc5ee05 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 14fc963b1 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new df5f2b362 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 241afde5a 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 4bf1be468 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 7139a81dd 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 0277dd445 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 52737d618 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new d34be1e78 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new c41ab04e0 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 4eb10cc9f 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new ef184c0ad 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3d51220e5 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 561235af3 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a7da3607b 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 223aae2e1 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1341d4db3 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5a9af2254 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b323ea952 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 24edf94de 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4ffdc1e92 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c33c6b87a 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 585422040 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 8cfcc7129 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e68578eb1 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d263e39d3 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new edabe5ef8 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a7bf75785 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4ce7764b9 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 05b78c909 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5f8d333d2 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a6abe727c onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 60cface72 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4b733991e onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 58fd3390c onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (f5245d53a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 79 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-coremark/gnu_eabi-arm_eabi-master-O3] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-coremark/gnu_eabi-arm_eabi-master-O3 updated (00978d4 -> 6e27440)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-coremark/gnu_eabi-arm_eabi-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-coremark/gnu_eabi-arm_eabi-master-O3. from 00978d4 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6e27440 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2496 -> 2468 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2600 -> 2592 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27588 -> 27128 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17656 -> 17740 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90220 -> 90832 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70704 -> 70804 bytes 06-build_abe-newlib/console.log.xz | Bin 12844 -> 12688 bytes 06-build_abe-newlib/make-newlib.log.xz | Bin 7136 -> 7160 bytes 07-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 167628 -> 167680 bytes 07-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 138704 -> 138572 bytes 08-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 40 ++-- 08-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3372 -> 3412 bytes 09-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 4524 -> 4520 bytes annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/newlib_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 240 ++++++++++++++++-------- jenkins/notify-init.log | 92 +++++---- jenkins/rewrite.log | 20 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 2 +- notify/jira/comment-template.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 34 ++-- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 12 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 2 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 28 +-- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 18 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 2 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 40 ++-- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 30 +-- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 12 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 12 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 12 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 12 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 12 +- 38 files changed, 369 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-) -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (95434bd3e -> f5245d53a)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards 95434bd3e onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c4db66d24 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 40f6e0e46 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 60ce4cdf2 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6b29de4e7 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 65a5555fb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ca5dfa5da onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d2a88c818 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 65cf6b43e onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0d170a3b1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 156390105 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0ec8d6255 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a5e521817 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b31dbfdf4 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ded8f59df 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 9e89bffa0 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5b6feb91a 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f599c52a4 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 15501d848 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cc5680171 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fa9de2426 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7c516c2a1 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ca040948d 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0494ba5b1 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards dbfac1284 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards e887c7987 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 2f6a252bb 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 1408f5259 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards fea21db26 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 1d5a01581 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 95599b7a6 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 15647634f 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards cd42c679e 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 032bf29d5 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 06829e318 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 24d1058cf 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 3ccb8df79 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 1a998ab10 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 71a26947a 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards a87eaf1e6 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards ba90ad2c9 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards a179dbfaa 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 5578e604c 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f9490f75b 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 74b5d2827 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 226afa438 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 634b96515 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 60d956ec0 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c00ef6e7c 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards fa63595a6 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards da8093bf2 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 6180b5745 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e5d6285d3 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 3590b0eae 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 273160a9b 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards a70a73fc3 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 39c770924 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 8d7865fc0 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 9b281d4a1 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 3581e9119 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 241f754f7 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 63b643f13 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f09d71868 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 254a5b8cc 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 7c577098f 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards a07aef1c3 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 994641e74 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 6abb07022 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards db941b4a9 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards ab13f32f3 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 00fde2b4b 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 0753bcea2 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 448f0b483 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards cea554a9e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 2917fe429 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 2bedcf76a 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 33ff779ff 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards e9b1d61dc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 670248a6c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 17434cddb 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new cb80cda61 onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e855ee4a2 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new fa6960fd5 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 321493922 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 4002da31c 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new e830849e7 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 5d37ec0b3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 2c2e32bf9 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 0020c3247 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new c20a4790c 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new b083c02dc 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 76c58c231 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 937973801 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new d7f61ebe1 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 856cd2325 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 77ae3ba78 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new bbd39ea01 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new d784598d0 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 379c2c914 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 31afb988d 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 225dd1120 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 134724e03 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 60de5b534 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new ebb0cba56 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 4aee0cac9 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 01cf861c2 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new d530300f6 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ccfc480d8 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 5b9f983f9 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 92bf0fc4f 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new aa7f122eb 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0d3c0d391 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new f3774bc22 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a2f8fec0c 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 2dfc99a2b 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 5b5663752 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 528269779 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3ddbcca83 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 514208fe0 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new c4a2ac16e 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new a0d4bde4e 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 086ac61dd 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 5683fc58b 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new a79972dbb 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new f45f1d6ed 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 37a9ebb53 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new e0ff01877 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new b5b854f3a 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new ca52dbbef 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new fac77ad94 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new b516a322b 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 8aeb0ddf6 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new b6d93fc94 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 9a1a2ff82 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 36192e143 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new f6aff3330 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 753179758 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 13670bc2d 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fb13fe4b7 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 00bc20db2 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ee2ebc530 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6c547cd49 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0d30aba71 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f2e590d21 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new eed08699e 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 5b57f4f7b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 801b80d81 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3eb995a61 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 75a59db20 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 754c88b68 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3e956efb6 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 70d0097af onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 611bb033f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 61699753e onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f4e55e23b onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0128176bf onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 21e604dd4 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8aa7e1739 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f7be59b26 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f5245d53a onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (95434bd3e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 80 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (674d8f981 -> 95434bd3e)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards 674d8f981 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 353a5e5e8 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 7ca8a5b6c onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6b773e33c onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8b230936a onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 071f330e7 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 85bfd01cd onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6fc4106d2 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 46751205f onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e404c28e7 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a5ddc9eab 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 418f46542 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7e4e9295a 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 03832527b 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2e29f7f49 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 8fc8c2e32 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d81e74f30 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 226ca1e3a 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d185d2dcd 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6031f1863 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5e387b8b3 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3ab4a0998 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8becf277f 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3bb206edb 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c341e4a51 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 46fe9f110 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards aa2d64fca 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 04c18dda3 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 2d3aee83b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards bbb5987f6 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 1d764606f 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards f19e2bc63 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 2561ef878 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 4c700cfa0 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 340eeb5ae 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 3c86db4b4 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards ecc1e803b 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 5838a18e5 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 2933dd6fd 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards a5490827f 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 8bf4dae57 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards d6035f136 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 53f341f1f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9e9012797 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2a0e243e1 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards f3500b855 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards a04af5836 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 235153cf3 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7ff339935 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards fdff82321 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards bf3d836f0 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 8e646b0c5 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9007b6989 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 12d58ed69 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a49dd5e78 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 3be0fbba8 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1b9303360 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards c53aaeb10 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards e02376033 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 1b0b2fc77 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards e4bf18d14 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards f5f699a76 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 2dabf467e 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 94bf413d8 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 64f381e43 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards db78fca51 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 07f8dd73d 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 78c917759 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 238f150b0 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards c3bb04eec 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards ebe2248d4 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards e02e0151f 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards ea64c6da0 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards ceb0c2a94 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 12343e64f 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 79ca959cc 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 1c765b3bb 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 7099e36bc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards c78102a88 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 5385fd8c2 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3578ae075 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 98b0e34ba onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 17434cddb 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 670248a6c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new e9b1d61dc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 33ff779ff 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 2bedcf76a 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 2917fe429 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new cea554a9e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 448f0b483 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 0753bcea2 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 00fde2b4b 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new ab13f32f3 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new db941b4a9 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 6abb07022 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 994641e74 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new a07aef1c3 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 7c577098f 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 254a5b8cc 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new f09d71868 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 63b643f13 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 241f754f7 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 3581e9119 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 9b281d4a1 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 8d7865fc0 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 39c770924 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a70a73fc3 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 273160a9b 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 3590b0eae 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e5d6285d3 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 6180b5745 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new da8093bf2 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new fa63595a6 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c00ef6e7c 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 60d956ec0 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 634b96515 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 226afa438 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 74b5d2827 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new f9490f75b 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5578e604c 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a179dbfaa 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new ba90ad2c9 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new a87eaf1e6 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 71a26947a 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 1a998ab10 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 3ccb8df79 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 24d1058cf 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 06829e318 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 032bf29d5 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new cd42c679e 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 15647634f 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 95599b7a6 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 1d5a01581 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new fea21db26 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 1408f5259 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 2f6a252bb 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e887c7987 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new dbfac1284 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 0494ba5b1 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ca040948d 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7c516c2a1 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fa9de2426 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cc5680171 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 15501d848 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f599c52a4 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5b6feb91a 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9e89bffa0 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ded8f59df 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b31dbfdf4 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a5e521817 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0ec8d6255 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 156390105 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0d170a3b1 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 65cf6b43e onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d2a88c818 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ca5dfa5da onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 65a5555fb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6b29de4e7 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 60ce4cdf2 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 40f6e0e46 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c4db66d24 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 95434bd3e onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (674d8f981) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 81 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-next-allyesconfig] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-next-allyesconfig updated (7005b03 -> 661f8f1)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-next-allyesconfig in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-next-allyesconfig. discards 7005b03 onsuccess: #97: 22397: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards af44648 onsuccess: #96: 22233: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 584ce50 onsuccess: #95: 22232: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f295272 onsuccess: #94: 22222: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1925643 onsuccess: #93: 22209: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2d30d83 force: #92: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel [...] discards 6689eb6 force: #91: 22220: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_k [...] discards 4f3c25b onsuccess: #90: 22220: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6c02976 onsuccess: #88: 22220: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 57a20c5 onsuccess: #87: 22220: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0ed2810 onsuccess: #84: 22217: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 10cf148 onsuccess: #83: 22179: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7ae1cbe onsuccess: #82: 22118: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 9f061f0 onsuccess: #81: 22108: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4544424 onsuccess: #80: 22099: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 15a1a11 onsuccess: #79: 22077: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a95da92 onsuccess: #78: 22061: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fa56a1e onsuccess: #77: 22060: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 89d9c9c force: #76: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel [...] discards 0616924 onsuccess: #74: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards f4cdee7 onsuccess: #72: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 6d940a9 onsuccess: #71: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards b52d747 onsuccess: #70: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 1ae6975 onsuccess: #69: 22009: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ee02bd6 onsuccess: #68: 22008: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7bcf7b0 onsuccess: #66: 21979: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 39b2f6e onsuccess: #65: 21966: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ff00128 onsuccess: #64: 21943: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 43dbb4e 102: onsuccess: #63: 21927: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/j [...] discards dc1cfaa 101: onsuccess: #62: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ad65d28 100: onsuccess: #61: 21941: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/j [...] discards d619a0c 99: onsuccess: #59: 21927: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/jo [...] discards d2c4557 98: onsuccess: #58: 21922: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/jo [...] discards c2f6454 97: force: #57: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ke [...] discards c8f19d5 96: force: #56: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 1ef9f64 95: onsuccess: #54: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 17be54b 94: onsuccess: #52: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 91cc043 93: onsuccess: #51: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 44cb563 92: onsuccess: #50: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4931001 91: onsuccess: #49: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1fa2a20 90: onsuccess: #47: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards fdc5920 89: force: #44: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 899ffdd 88: force: #42: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards eaa97e1 87: force: #40: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 80f7749 86: force: #38: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 6900039 85: force: #36: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 611e779 84: force: #34: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards ce5c7ed 83: force: #29: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 367954a 82: onsuccess: #27: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c969a7f 81: force: #24: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 0c1aeeb 80: onsuccess: #22: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a9785d3 79: onsuccess: #19: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 45d5f06 78: onsuccess: #17: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0c92476 77: onsuccess: #16: all: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/llv [...] discards 75e14fc 76: onsuccess: #15: 21786: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/l [...] discards 8bb0fb8 75: onsuccess: #13: 21757: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/ [...] discards 12c2d3f 74: onsuccess: #12: 21738: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/ [...] discards 53e929e 73: onsuccess: #11: 21727: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/ [...] discards d279f1f 72: onsuccess: #10: 21715: Success after linux: 2653 commits discards 1d5eb89 71: onsuccess: #9: 21745: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 7 [...] discards 5ce7cd5 70: force: #7: 21745: Failure after linux: 61 commits discards ea9889b 69: onsuccess: #5: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 556 [...] discards bd7d6d5 68: onsuccess: #3: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/qem [...] discards a50bdc2 67: onsuccess: #2: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/qem [...] discards 7e56059 66: onsuccess: #749: all: Success after binutils/llvm: 19 commits discards 024878f 65: onsuccess: #1: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/qem [...] discards ecd3fdd 64: onsuccess: #748: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] discards 99bd8bf 63: onsuccess: #746: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 6 [...] discards bd30d59 62: onsuccess: #744: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] discards b89f9bb 61: onsuccess: #743: 21686: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] discards 3bd109c 60: onsuccess: #742: 21664: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] discards a71e792 59: force: #740: 21636: Failure after v6.2-rc3-45-gbd904f3c74 [...] discards 4a402a7 58: force: #739: all: Success after linux: 71 commits discards 29065b8 57: onsuccess: #736: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: [...] discards 05ffa84 56: onsuccess: #733: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: [...] discards 49dbeb6 55: onsuccess: #730: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: [...] discards b7eec69 54: onsuccess: #727: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: [...] discards 72e054b 53: onsuccess: #725: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] discards 2685d6b 52: onsuccess: #724: 21574: Success after binutils/llvm: 420 commits discards e5ff6c9 51: onsuccess: #723: 21574: Success after linux: 15638 commits discards db1fae9 50: force: #722: 21355: Failure after v6.1-rc8-270-g1b19c4c24 [...] discards 78df012 49: force: #721: all: Success after linux: 20 commits discards 8b81b5e 48: onsuccess: #719: 21643: Success after binutils/llvm: 174 commits discards 7d10753 47: onsuccess: #717: 21643: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] discards eaf357b 46: force: #716: 21627: Failure after linux: 174 commits discards f49fba5 45: onsuccess: #714: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 6 [...] discards fff30f0 44: onsuccess: #712: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] discards 7955276 43: onsuccess: #711: 21613: Success after binutils/llvm: 577 commits discards 49d532d 42: onsuccess: #710: 21613: Success after linux: 15183 commits discards 511f571 41: force: #709: 21402: Failure after v6.1-rc4-181-g0d2b746b1 [...] discards 99487ec 40: force: #708: all: Success after linux: 29 commits discards 26c86f5 39: onsuccess: #706: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 1 [...] discards d6a7d11 38: onsuccess: #703: all: Success after binutils: 110 commits discards 04b322a 37: onsuccess: #701: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] discards ff8e090 36: onsuccess: #700: 21558: Success after linux: 9698 commits discards e91308d 35: force: #699: 21442: Failure after v6.1-rc4-1107-g8cab76ec [...] discards 7afd030 34: force: #698: all: Success after linux: 15 commits discards d683869 33: onsuccess: #696: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 4 [...] discards 3446d7f 32: onsuccess: #694: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] discards a0b2df7 31: onsuccess: #693: 21531: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] new 8da32e9 31: onsuccess: #693: 21531: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] new c8830f2 32: onsuccess: #694: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] new ad8d162 33: onsuccess: #696: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 4 [...] new f0dd831 34: force: #698: all: Success after linux: 15 commits new 8588a15 35: force: #699: 21442: Failure after v6.1-rc4-1107-g8cab76ec [...] new d21f5d6 36: onsuccess: #700: 21558: Success after linux: 9698 commits new c05c28a 37: onsuccess: #701: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] new afd2ec0 38: onsuccess: #703: all: Success after binutils: 110 commits new 685e822 39: onsuccess: #706: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 1 [...] new 4400ef2 40: force: #708: all: Success after linux: 29 commits new a066d5c 41: force: #709: 21402: Failure after v6.1-rc4-181-g0d2b746b1 [...] new d801cfe 42: onsuccess: #710: 21613: Success after linux: 15183 commits new cce7c56 43: onsuccess: #711: 21613: Success after binutils/llvm: 577 commits new 29425f4 44: onsuccess: #712: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] new 229ec56 45: onsuccess: #714: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 6 [...] new c715808 46: force: #716: 21627: Failure after linux: 174 commits new 99d2009 47: onsuccess: #717: 21643: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] new 5ee885a 48: onsuccess: #719: 21643: Success after binutils/llvm: 174 commits new 14713d5 49: force: #721: all: Success after linux: 20 commits new 3ad32b3 50: force: #722: 21355: Failure after v6.1-rc8-270-g1b19c4c24 [...] new d92e31f 51: onsuccess: #723: 21574: Success after linux: 15638 commits new 4a15a9e 52: onsuccess: #724: 21574: Success after binutils/llvm: 420 commits new 959b860 53: onsuccess: #725: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] new faab27d 54: onsuccess: #727: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: [...] new 35ff221 55: onsuccess: #730: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: [...] new 111300c 56: onsuccess: #733: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: [...] new 3749925 57: onsuccess: #736: 21635: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: [...] new 014a87c 58: force: #739: all: Success after linux: 71 commits new 89628c5 59: force: #740: 21636: Failure after v6.2-rc3-45-gbd904f3c74 [...] new 73f2151 60: onsuccess: #742: 21664: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] new 32252a5 61: onsuccess: #743: 21686: Success after binutils/llvm/linux [...] new 59ddc46 62: onsuccess: #744: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] new 5c2c760 63: onsuccess: #746: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 6 [...] new 0f3c4d0 64: onsuccess: #748: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/q [...] new e36cf37 65: onsuccess: #1: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/qem [...] new aa1da4e 66: onsuccess: #749: all: Success after binutils/llvm: 19 commits new 61caa83 67: onsuccess: #2: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/qem [...] new 4c275d6 68: onsuccess: #3: all: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/qem [...] new d29a003 69: onsuccess: #5: all: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 556 [...] new 0a87337 70: force: #7: 21745: Failure after linux: 61 commits new b062fa3 71: onsuccess: #9: 21745: Success after binutils/llvm/qemu: 7 [...] new f726ea8 72: onsuccess: #10: 21715: Success after linux: 2653 commits new 1ecabf5 73: onsuccess: #11: 21727: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/ [...] new 6f5c383 74: onsuccess: #12: 21738: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/ [...] new 0200285 75: onsuccess: #13: 21757: Success after binutils/llvm/linux/ [...] new c9b2472 76: onsuccess: #15: 21786: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/l [...] new 82bce18 77: onsuccess: #16: all: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/llv [...] new 689ab1a 78: onsuccess: #17: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new cb4a5f8 79: onsuccess: #19: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 348651c 80: onsuccess: #22: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a861383 81: force: #24: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new e4335ca 82: onsuccess: #27: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d2fa29a 83: force: #29: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 9e19b3d 84: force: #34: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new f8e3770 85: force: #36: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 7f9a136 86: force: #38: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 33ab329 87: force: #40: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new c03222b 88: force: #42: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new fc69787 89: force: #44: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 949d863 90: onsuccess: #47: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a8eb4ac 91: onsuccess: #49: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a38e1ef 92: onsuccess: #50: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 4f59e8c 93: onsuccess: #51: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f0d67db 94: onsuccess: #52: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3d11898 95: onsuccess: #54: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3a04ebf 96: force: #56: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 2024e4e 97: force: #57: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ke [...] new 4fe24e0 98: onsuccess: #58: 21922: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/jo [...] new 4b5d6b4 99: onsuccess: #59: 21927: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/jo [...] new 5f5e8fd 100: onsuccess: #61: 21941: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/j [...] new 37321ba 101: onsuccess: #62: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c58145a 102: onsuccess: #63: 21927: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/j [...] new 8c5499f onsuccess: #64: 21943: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1e4ef63 onsuccess: #65: 21966: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d7a798c onsuccess: #66: 21979: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4af537f onsuccess: #68: 22008: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 02ef002 onsuccess: #69: 22009: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 31d4755 onsuccess: #70: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 19c2264 onsuccess: #71: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new d725362 onsuccess: #72: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new d014565 onsuccess: #74: all: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 98b06f9 force: #76: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel [...] new e7399b5 onsuccess: #77: 22060: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e585a6c onsuccess: #78: 22061: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b92244d onsuccess: #79: 22077: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new de90d05 onsuccess: #80: 22099: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b179b24 onsuccess: #81: 22108: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e3a5179 onsuccess: #82: 22118: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 87be2e1 onsuccess: #83: 22179: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2799a98 onsuccess: #84: 22217: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 158ece1 onsuccess: #87: 22220: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2f23542 onsuccess: #88: 22220: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 57b85c6 onsuccess: #90: 22220: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cdf6d57 force: #91: 22220: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_k [...] new 76e841c force: #92: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel [...] new ebd916d onsuccess: #93: 22209: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4f3a9ce onsuccess: #94: 22222: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 84cdb93 onsuccess: #95: 22232: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fe0c389 onsuccess: #96: 22233: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d73fd33 onsuccess: #97: 22397: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 661f8f1 onsuccess: #98: 22397: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (7005b03) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2300 -> 2312 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2596 -> 2640 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27484 -> 27784 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 18048 -> 18080 bytes 04-build_kernel_llvm/console.log.xz | Bin 67880 -> 67428 bytes 05-build_abe-qemu/console.log.xz | Bin 33916 -> 34232 bytes 05-build_abe-qemu/make-qemu.log.xz | Bin 22844 -> 22944 bytes 06-build_linux/console.log.xz | Bin 4436 -> 4448 bytes 08-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 1280 -> 1276 bytes git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/llvm_rev | 2 +- git/qemu_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 291 +++++++++++------------------ jenkins/notify-init.log | 108 +++++------ jenkins/rewrite.log | 27 +-- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/jira/comment-template.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 50 +++-- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- 21 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 297 deletions(-) -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-cpu2017rate/llvm-arm-master-O3] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-cpu2017rate/llvm-arm-master-O3 updated (3aacd5a -> f86155a)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-cpu2017rate/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-cpu2017rate/llvm-arm-master-O3. from 3aacd5a onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f86155a force: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2420 -> 2292 bytes 02-build_bmk_llvm/console.log.xz | Bin 233960 -> 234840 bytes 03-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 127 +- 03-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3288 -> 3284 bytes 04-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 3636 -> 3936 bytes 04-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- 04-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 45 +- 04-check_regression/results.regressions | 1 + annex/bmk-data | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 5884 +--- jenkins/notify-init.log | 132 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 22 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 9 +- manifest.sh | 10 +- notify/any.skipped | 1 - notify/exe.regression | 1 + notify/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- notify/jira/comment-template.txt | 4 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 15 +- notify/mail-recipients.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 108 +- notify/results.regressions | 1 + results | 1 + results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 32 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 10 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 37 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 24 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 192 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 4629 ++- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 5301 +++- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 23 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 187 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 199 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 35872 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 25 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 201 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 45 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 45 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 21 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 45 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2156 +- 43 files changed, 26943 insertions(+), 28474 deletions(-) create mode 100644 04-check_regression/results.regressions delete mode 100644 notify/any.skipped create mode 100644 notify/exe.regression create mode 100644 notify/results.regressions -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (f067a4e3c -> 674d8f981)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards f067a4e3c onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b64dacf74 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 17f5cd5b2 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c25f66d43 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 17a51437c onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 283862421 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2bbe33bbf onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e93aedc79 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 503d35ba1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 38344c616 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a1c67006b 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4ebf5bbb6 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 11b6bbffe 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e11678fda 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5b760f88c 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5b4436659 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 957af46d3 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 10e888d2c 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards eec7904a7 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4d5fb7c59 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 9f5307cea 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 523f1e9ae 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f5d8b567a 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b5787d2c5 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards efddcf596 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 6bd952843 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards bd0498941 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 46982fd80 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards e54e9a669 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 03b0cb230 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 5e38168c4 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards ad6e9acf6 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 47947648b 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 30104e33e 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 06f99439e 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 7a7d42589 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 21ff9c40e 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 34285dced 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards f96d62a0c 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards b3d69481b 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 941292d6d 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 44325729d 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards e5ce34e17 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1fb41c819 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5f31d7ef8 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards d790ee0c7 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 687e58e48 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 2ec1f8d6f 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 33b58df3d 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 325d7e937 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4828fe824 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards b8d83c3e0 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a7a2344cb 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards dfaca3d92 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 924cab9b2 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 7811bc5cd 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 7ae80c153 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 66e39bdbc 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 88a5a28a7 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards b2a130d04 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 6613ccf72 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 85fdea4e8 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards da645ff8c 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards c1852930f 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards d17e5a705 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards bb115815d 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards caa431f6a 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards d2ebd948e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards bf33c8143 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards de23ac468 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 82d7a4322 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 623722023 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 743250e1c 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards afb176a55 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 4f9185716 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 86c004df8 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 1523319c6 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards abc2d69bf 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards e51cf32b5 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards ec08fb53e 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fdc2ca37f 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 302d3808f 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6c408d0ac onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 3578ae075 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 5385fd8c2 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c78102a88 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 7099e36bc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 1c765b3bb 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 79ca959cc 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 12343e64f 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new ceb0c2a94 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new ea64c6da0 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new e02e0151f 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new ebe2248d4 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new c3bb04eec 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 238f150b0 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 78c917759 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 07f8dd73d 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new db78fca51 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 64f381e43 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 94bf413d8 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 2dabf467e 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f5f699a76 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e4bf18d14 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 1b0b2fc77 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e02376033 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new c53aaeb10 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 1b9303360 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 3be0fbba8 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new a49dd5e78 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 12d58ed69 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9007b6989 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 8e646b0c5 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new bf3d836f0 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new fdff82321 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 7ff339935 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 235153cf3 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a04af5836 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new f3500b855 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 2a0e243e1 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 9e9012797 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 53f341f1f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d6035f136 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 8bf4dae57 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new a5490827f 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 2933dd6fd 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 5838a18e5 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new ecc1e803b 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 3c86db4b4 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 340eeb5ae 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 4c700cfa0 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 2561ef878 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new f19e2bc63 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 1d764606f 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new bbb5987f6 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 2d3aee83b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 04c18dda3 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new aa2d64fca 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 46fe9f110 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new c341e4a51 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 3bb206edb 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8becf277f 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3ab4a0998 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5e387b8b3 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6031f1863 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d185d2dcd 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 226ca1e3a 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d81e74f30 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8fc8c2e32 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2e29f7f49 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 03832527b 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7e4e9295a 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 418f46542 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a5ddc9eab 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e404c28e7 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 46751205f onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6fc4106d2 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 85bfd01cd onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 071f330e7 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8b230936a onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6b773e33c onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7ca8a5b6c onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 353a5e5e8 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 674d8f981 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (f067a4e3c) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 82 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO updated (7da66907 -> 8188e01b)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO. discards 7da66907 onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5e7fa13a onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards dd7b22e2 onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fd597547 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6d916b28 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b6a39735 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 67a6e1f3 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 16d62663 onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 276120b5 onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8188e01b onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (7da66907) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 5 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO updated (060967b6 -> 7da66907)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO. discards 060967b6 onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b952cae9 onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 574fc460 onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1ded725a onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 414c22df onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 63754ea5 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c2b4f54c onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6d916b28 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fd597547 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new dd7b22e2 onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5e7fa13a onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7da66907 onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (060967b6) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 6 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO updated (faf57446 -> 060967b6)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO. discards faf57446 onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fcbaaa7b onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ef95c17d onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 42eb62a3 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9bfd99d6 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7f52a9ab onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f06857c7 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bd01dda6 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 63754ea5 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 414c22df onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1ded725a onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 574fc460 onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b952cae9 onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 060967b6 onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (faf57446) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 7 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

Tcwg-commits September 2023