This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/p... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Thanks, Sasha
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Christian König (1): drm/nouveau: fix dma_address check for CPU/GPU sync
Johannes Berg (1): gpio: AMD8111 and TQMX86 require HAS_IOPORT_MAP
Loic Poulain (1): gpio: mxc: Fix disabled interrupt wake-up support
ManYi Li (1): scsi: sr: Return appropriate error code when disk is ejected
Mark Bloch (1): RDMA/mlx5: Block FDB rules when not in switchdev mode
Sasha Levin (1): Linux 5.10.48-rc1
Sean Christopherson (1): Revert "KVM: x86/mmu: Drop kvm_mmu_extended_role.cr4_la57 hack"
Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 1 + drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 ++ drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 4 ++-- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/fs.c | 7 +++++++ drivers/scsi/sr.c | 2 ++ 8 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 06:59:50 -0400, Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/p... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Thanks, Sasha
5.10.48-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 07:43:34PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Thanks for testing Pavel!
On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 06:59:50 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/p... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Thanks, Sasha
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 70 tests: 70 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.48-rc1-gdd50b7327ff6 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 06:59:50AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 455 pass: 455 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2021/7/5 18:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/p... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Thanks, Sasha
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.48-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.48-rc1 Commit: dd50b7327ff62c603651aef64089569dd293b34d Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8906 passed: 8906 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8906 passed: 8906 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:01:43AM +0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
On 2021/7/5 18:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/p... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Thanks, Sasha
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.48-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.48-rc1 Commit: dd50b7327ff62c603651aef64089569dd293b34d Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64:
Testcase Result Summary: total: 8906 passed: 8906 failed: 0 timeout: 0
x86:
Testcase Result Summary: total: 8906 passed: 8906 failed: 0 timeout: 0
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
Thanks for testing Samuel!
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 16:30, Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/p... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Thanks, Sasha
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.48-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: dd50b7327ff62c603651aef64089569dd293b34d * git describe: v5.10.47-7-gdd50b7327ff6 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.47)
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.47)
## Test result summary total: 76152, pass: 63402, fail: 1638, skip: 10082, xfail: 1030,
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 193 total, 193 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Sasha,
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 06:59:50AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210702): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210702): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210702): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 04:14:20PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
Hi Sasha,
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 06:59:50AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210702): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210702): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210702): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
Thanks for testing Sudip!
On 7/5/21 4:59 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.48 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed 07 Jul 2021 10:59:49 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/p... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Thanks, Sasha
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
-
Fox Chen -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Samuel Zou -
Sasha Levin -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee