This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.25-rc1
Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com net: dsa: b53: Support setting learning on port
Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de ALSA: usb-audio: Don't avoid stopping the stream at disconnection
J. Bruce Fields bfields@redhat.com Revert "nfsd4: a client's own opens needn't prevent delegations"
J. Bruce Fields bfields@redhat.com Revert "nfsd4: remove check_conflicting_opens warning"
Amir Goldstein amir73il@gmail.com fuse: fix live lock in fuse_iget()
Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin nmoreychaisemartin@suse.com RDMA/srp: Fix support for unpopulated and unbalanced NUMA nodes
Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com bpf, selftests: Fix up some test_verifier cases for unprivileged
Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com bpf: Add sanity check for upper ptr_limit
Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com bpf: Simplify alu_limit masking for pointer arithmetic
Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com bpf: Fix off-by-one for area size in creating mask to left
Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com bpf: Prohibit alu ops for pointer types not defining ptr_limit
Ard Biesheuvel ardb@kernel.org crypto: x86/aes-ni-xts - use direct calls to and 4-way stride
Uros Bizjak ubizjak@gmail.com crypto: aesni - Use TEST %reg,%reg instead of CMP $0,%reg
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S | 133 ++++++++++++--------- arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_avx-x86_64.S | 20 ++-- arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c | 25 ++-- drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 110 +++++++---------- drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 18 +++ drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_regs.h | 1 + drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 15 +-- fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 1 + fs/locks.c | 3 - fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 53 +++----- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 33 +++-- sound/usb/endpoint.c | 3 - sound/usb/pcm.c | 5 +- .../selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c | 27 +++-- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c | 4 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c | 15 ++- .../selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 23 +++- 18 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 227 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 17:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.10.25-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: b05da84e91a81ee89c814d51c18cc6f5b077256a git describe: v5.10.24-14-gb05da84e91a8 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
No regressions (compared to build v5.10.24)
No fixes (compared to build v5.10.24)
Ran 57572 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments -------------- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm-debug - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-debug - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-i386-debug - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-debug - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64
Test Suites ----------- * build * linux-log-parser * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * fwts * kselftest- * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-android * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-zram * kunit * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-vm * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-x86 * rcutorture * timesync-off
On 3/19/2021 5:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:06:36PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/19/2021 5:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
thanks for testing 2 of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:18:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 432 pass: 432 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2021/3/19 20:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.25 release. There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:17:37 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.25-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.25,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.25 Commit: 3ba56f490c7ab26974806f8c2f14fc49652efe10 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 4721 passed: 4721 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 4721 passed: 4721 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com