On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 08:12:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 02:31:21PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.43 release. There are 438 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:27:16 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build reference: v6.12.43 Compiler version: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0 Assembler version: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.44
Configuration file workarounds: "s/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=.*/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=0/"
Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed
Error log: drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c: In function 'ti_hecc_start': drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c:386:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'BIT_U32'; did you mean 'BIT_ULL'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 386 | mbx_mask = ~BIT_U32(HECC_RX_LAST_MBOX); | ^~~~~~~ | BIT_ULL
There is no BIT_U32 in v6.12.y. The same build error is seen in v6.15.11, which is also missing the definition of BIT_U32. Odd that no one seems to have noticed this. Am I missing something ?
I'm now seeing this as well. I'm guessing no one else does arm32 full builds anymore? I guess no one cares about that platform anymore :(
I'll go revert the offending commit, thanks for letting me know.
greg k-h