From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com
Commit 64afe6e9eb4841f35317da4393de21a047a883b3 upstream.
The current pending table parsing code assumes that we keep the previous read of the pending bits, but keep that variable in the current block, making sure it is discarded on each loop.
We end-up using whatever is on the stack. Who knows, it might just be the right thing...
Fixes: 33d3bc9556a7d ("KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Read initial LPI pending table") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.8 Reported-by: AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.akashi@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org --- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c index 4660a7d04eea..bbd4a988e8c1 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ static int its_sync_lpi_pending_table(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) int ret = 0; u32 *intids; int nr_irqs, i; + u8 pendmask;
nr_irqs = vgic_copy_lpi_list(vcpu->kvm, &intids); if (nr_irqs < 0) @@ -329,7 +330,6 @@ static int its_sync_lpi_pending_table(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) { int byte_offset, bit_nr; - u8 pendmask;
byte_offset = intids[i] / BITS_PER_BYTE; bit_nr = intids[i] % BITS_PER_BYTE;
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org wrote:
From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com
Commit 64afe6e9eb4841f35317da4393de21a047a883b3 upstream.
Please disregard this, I accidentally backported the arm64 patch instead of the arm patch.
Another one (the correct one, hopefully) incoming.
The current pending table parsing code assumes that we keep the previous read of the pending bits, but keep that variable in the current block, making sure it is discarded on each loop.
We end-up using whatever is on the stack. Who knows, it might just be the right thing...
Fixes: 33d3bc9556a7d ("KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Read initial LPI pending table") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.8 Reported-by: AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.akashi@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c index 4660a7d04eea..bbd4a988e8c1 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ static int its_sync_lpi_pending_table(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) int ret = 0; u32 *intids; int nr_irqs, i;
u8 pendmask; nr_irqs = vgic_copy_lpi_list(vcpu->kvm, &intids); if (nr_irqs < 0)
@@ -329,7 +330,6 @@ static int its_sync_lpi_pending_table(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) { int byte_offset, bit_nr;
u8 pendmask; byte_offset = intids[i] / BITS_PER_BYTE; bit_nr = intids[i] % BITS_PER_BYTE;
-- 2.14.2
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org wrote:
From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com
Commit 64afe6e9eb4841f35317da4393de21a047a883b3 upstream.
Please disregard this, I accidentally backported the arm64 patch instead of the arm patch.
Another one (the correct one, hopefully) incoming.
Actually, do NOT disregard this one, but apply this one.
I'll reply to the patch that you should actually disregard.
Not my day I guess.
Sorry, -Christoffer
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org