On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:57 PM Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 6b0c81b3be11 mm, oom: reduce dependency on tasklist_lock.
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.3, v4.19.16, v4.14.94, v4.9.151, v4.4.171, v3.18.132.
v4.20.3: Build OK! v4.19.16: Build OK! v4.14.94: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 5989ad7b5ede ("mm, oom: refactor oom_kill_process()")
Very easy to resolve the conflict. Please let me know if you want me to send a version for 4.14-stable kernel.
v4.9.151: Build OK! v4.4.171: Build OK! v3.18.132: Build OK!
How should we proceed with this patch?
We do want to backport this patch to stable kernels. However shouldn't we wait for this patch to be applied to Linus's tree first.
Shakeel
Shakeel Butt wrote:
How should we proceed with this patch?
We do want to backport this patch to stable kernels. However shouldn't we wait for this patch to be applied to Linus's tree first.
But since Andrew Morton seems to be offline since Jan 11, we don't know when this patch will arrive at Linus's tree.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:35:27AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Shakeel Butt wrote:
How should we proceed with this patch?
We do want to backport this patch to stable kernels. However shouldn't we wait for this patch to be applied to Linus's tree first.
Yes we will.
But since Andrew Morton seems to be offline since Jan 11, we don't know when this patch will arrive at Linus's tree.
That's fine, we can wait :)
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg KH -
Shakeel Butt -
Tetsuo Handa