From: Sean Paul seanpaul@chromium.org
Spec says[1] Allocated_PBN is 16 bits
[1]- DisplayPort 1.2 Spec, Section 2.11.9.8, Table 2-98
Fixes: ad7f8a1f9ced ("drm/helper: add Displayport multi-stream helper (v0.6)") Cc: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com Cc: Todd Previte tprevite@gmail.com Cc: Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@bootlin.com Cc: Sean Paul sean@poorly.run Cc: David Airlie airlied@linux.ie Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.17+ Signed-off-by: Sean Paul seanpaul@chromium.org --- include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h index 2ba6253ea6d3..fc349204a71b 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ struct drm_dp_resource_status_notify {
struct drm_dp_query_payload_ack_reply { u8 port_number; - u8 allocated_pbn; + u16 allocated_pbn; };
struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body {
Is it worth actually CCing stable on this? This patch is certainly correct but I don't think we use this struct for anything quite yet.
Otherwise: Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 12:52 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
From: Sean Paul seanpaul@chromium.org
Spec says[1] Allocated_PBN is 16 bits
[1]- DisplayPort 1.2 Spec, Section 2.11.9.8, Table 2-98
Fixes: ad7f8a1f9ced ("drm/helper: add Displayport multi-stream helper (v0.6)") Cc: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com Cc: Todd Previte tprevite@gmail.com Cc: Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@bootlin.com Cc: Sean Paul sean@poorly.run Cc: David Airlie airlied@linux.ie Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.17+ Signed-off-by: Sean Paul seanpaul@chromium.org
include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h index 2ba6253ea6d3..fc349204a71b 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ struct drm_dp_resource_status_notify { struct drm_dp_query_payload_ack_reply { u8 port_number;
- u8 allocated_pbn;
- u16 allocated_pbn;
}; struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body {
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 01:06:58PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
Is it worth actually CCing stable on this? This patch is certainly correct but I don't think we use this struct for anything quite yet.
Otherwise: Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com
Thanks for the review! I've stripped the cc stable tag and pushed to drm-misc-next. We'll have to keep an eye out for Sasha's stable AI bot, I'm guessing it'll try to backport this to stable regardless.
Sean
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 12:52 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
From: Sean Paul seanpaul@chromium.org
Spec says[1] Allocated_PBN is 16 bits
[1]- DisplayPort 1.2 Spec, Section 2.11.9.8, Table 2-98
Fixes: ad7f8a1f9ced ("drm/helper: add Displayport multi-stream helper (v0.6)") Cc: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com Cc: Todd Previte tprevite@gmail.com Cc: Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@bootlin.com Cc: Sean Paul sean@poorly.run Cc: David Airlie airlied@linux.ie Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.17+ Signed-off-by: Sean Paul seanpaul@chromium.org
include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h index 2ba6253ea6d3..fc349204a71b 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ struct drm_dp_resource_status_notify { struct drm_dp_query_payload_ack_reply { u8 port_number;
- u8 allocated_pbn;
- u16 allocated_pbn;
}; struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body {
-- Cheers, Lyude Paul
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:44:15PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 01:06:58PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
Is it worth actually CCing stable on this? This patch is certainly correct but I don't think we use this struct for anything quite yet.
Otherwise: Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com
Thanks for the review! I've stripped the cc stable tag and pushed to drm-misc-next. We'll have to keep an eye out for Sasha's stable AI bot, I'm guessing it'll try to backport this to stable regardless.
Knowing the bot, it probably will :)
I'll add a note for myself...
-- Thanks, Sasha
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org