On Sun, Dec 21, 2025 at 03:42:58PM -0800, Ethan Nelson-Moore wrote:

Hi, Andrew,

The other two are correct because they intend to write multiple registers - they are used with a length parameter.

Please don't top post.

How finished do you think this driver is? Are there likely to be more instances of SR_WR_REG/SR_WR_REGS added in the future? If so, it might make sense to change the code to make this sort of error less likely.

SR_WR_MULTIPLE_REG and SR_WR_ONE_REG?

Andrew