devm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure but this returned value is not checked. Fix this lack and check the returned value.
Found by code review.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: a0f160ffcb83 ("pinctrl: add pinctrl/GPIO driver for Apple SoCs") Signed-off-by: Ma Ke make24@iscas.ac.cn --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c index 3751c7de37aa..f861e63f4115 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c @@ -474,6 +474,9 @@ static int apple_gpio_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) for (i = 0; i < npins; i++) { pins[i].number = i; pins[i].name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "PIN%u", i); + if (!pins[i].name) + return -ENOMEM; + pins[i].drv_data = pctl; pin_names[i] = pins[i].name; pin_nums[i] = i;
Le 12/09/2024 à 04:08, Ma Ke a écrit :
devm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure but this returned value is not checked. Fix this lack and check the returned value.
Found by code review.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: a0f160ffcb83 ("pinctrl: add pinctrl/GPIO driver for Apple SoCs") Signed-off-by: Ma Ke make24@iscas.ac.cn
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c index 3751c7de37aa..f861e63f4115 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-apple-gpio.c @@ -474,6 +474,9 @@ static int apple_gpio_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) for (i = 0; i < npins; i++) { pins[i].number = i; pins[i].name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "PIN%u", i);
if (!pins[i].name)
return -ENOMEM;
- pins[i].drv_data = pctl; pin_names[i] = pins[i].name; pin_nums[i] = i;
Hi,
this is not really an issue. if pin[i].name is NULL, then pinctrl_generic_add_group() below will fail with -EINVAL. So your change only returns a more correct error code and saves a few cycles in case of (unlikely) memory allocation issue.
Anyway: Reviewed-by: Christophe JAILLET christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
CJ
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org