On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:26:10AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

Hello Sasha,

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:57:44PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:

...

[This is an automated email]

Not sure if I only state the obvious that was just missed by your automation.

...

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: cbffaf7aa09e can: flexcan: Always use last mailbox for TX.

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.3, v4.19.16.

v4.20.3: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0517961ccdf1 ("can: flexcan: Add provision for variable payload size") 22233f7bf2c9 ("can: flexcan: FLEXCAN_IFLAG_MB: add () around macro argument") 5156c7b11f35 ("can: flexcan: move rx_offload_add() from flexcan_probe() to flexcan_open()") 7ad0f53a394b ("can: flexcan: flexcan_chip_start(): enable loopback mode in flexcan") de3578c198c6 ("can: flexcan: add self wakeup support")

v4.19.16: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0517961ccdf1 ("can: flexcan: Add provision for variable payload size") 22233f7bf2c9 ("can: flexcan: FLEXCAN_IFLAG_MB: add () around macro argument") 5156c7b11f35 ("can: flexcan: move rx_offload_add() from flexcan_probe() to flexcan_open()") 7ad0f53a394b ("can: flexcan: flexcan_chip_start(): enable loopback mode in flexcan") de3578c198c6 ("can: flexcan: add self wakeup support")

How should we proceed with this patch?

When I posted the commit I also posted one that fits on top of v4.19.x. I would expect that the same also fits on v4.20.x. If not, tell me.

Ah, I see that now, sorry for the noise of the FAILED email...