Sometimes it is better to unregister individual nodes instead of trying to do them all at once with software_node_unregister_nodes(), so create software_node_unregister() so that you can unregister them one at a time.
This is especially important when creating nodes in a hierarchy, with parent -> children representations. Children always need to be removed before a parent is, as the swnode logic assumes this is going to be the case.
Fix up the lib/test_printf.c fwnode_pointer() test which to use this new function as it had the problem of tearing things down in the backwards order.
Fixes: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Reported-by: kernel test robot rong.a.chen@intel.com Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com Cc: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Cc: Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com Cc: Petr Mladek pmladek@suse.com Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Cc: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Cc: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/base/swnode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ include/linux/property.h | 1 + lib/test_printf.c | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c index de8d3543e8fe..770b1f47a625 100644 --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c @@ -712,17 +712,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register_nodes); * @nodes: Zero terminated array of software nodes to be unregistered * * Unregister multiple software nodes at once. + * + * NOTE: Be careful using this call if the nodes had parent pointers set up in + * them before registering. If so, it is wiser to remove the nodes + * individually, in the correct order (child before parent) instead of relying + * on the sequential order of the list of nodes in the array. */ void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes) { - struct swnode *swnode; int i;
- for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++) { - swnode = software_node_to_swnode(&nodes[i]); - if (swnode) - fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode); - } + for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++) + software_node_unregister(&nodes[i]); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister_nodes);
@@ -741,6 +742,20 @@ int software_node_register(const struct software_node *node) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register);
+/** + * software_node_unregister - Unregister static software node + * @node: The software node to be unregistered + */ +void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node) +{ + struct swnode *swnode; + + swnode = software_node_to_swnode(node); + if (swnode) + fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister); + struct fwnode_handle * fwnode_create_software_node(const struct property_entry *properties, const struct fwnode_handle *parent) diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h index d86de017c689..0d4099b4ce1f 100644 --- a/include/linux/property.h +++ b/include/linux/property.h @@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ int software_node_register_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes); void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes);
int software_node_register(const struct software_node *node); +void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node);
int software_node_notify(struct device *dev, unsigned long action);
diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c index 6b1622f4d7c2..fc63b8959d42 100644 --- a/lib/test_printf.c +++ b/lib/test_printf.c @@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ static void __init fwnode_pointer(void) test(second_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[1])); test(third_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[2]));
- software_node_unregister_nodes(softnodes); + software_node_unregister(&softnodes[2]); + software_node_unregister(&softnodes[1]); + software_node_unregister(&softnodes[0]); }
static void __init
On 5/24/20 8:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Sometimes it is better to unregister individual nodes instead of trying to do them all at once with software_node_unregister_nodes(), so create software_node_unregister() so that you can unregister them one at a time.
This is especially important when creating nodes in a hierarchy, with parent -> children representations. Children always need to be removed before a parent is, as the swnode logic assumes this is going to be the case.
Fix up the lib/test_printf.c fwnode_pointer() test which to use this new function as it had the problem of tearing things down in the backwards order.
Fixes: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Reported-by: kernel test robot rong.a.chen@intel.com Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com Cc: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Cc: Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com Cc: Petr Mladek pmladek@suse.com Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Cc: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Cc: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Both patches pass my boot tests on arm64 and arm64be (I didn't test any others). So, FWIW,
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
I wasn't sure it the two patches replace or fix commit 4ef12f719802 ("kobject: Make sure the parent does not get released before its children"), so I tried to re-apply 4ef12f719802 on top of the two patches. Unfortunately that still results in crashes and UAF messages.
Guenter
On 5/24/20 9:43 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 5/24/20 8:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Sometimes it is better to unregister individual nodes instead of trying to do them all at once with software_node_unregister_nodes(), so create software_node_unregister() so that you can unregister them one at a time.
This is especially important when creating nodes in a hierarchy, with parent -> children representations. Children always need to be removed before a parent is, as the swnode logic assumes this is going to be the case.
Fix up the lib/test_printf.c fwnode_pointer() test which to use this new function as it had the problem of tearing things down in the backwards order.
Fixes: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Reported-by: kernel test robot rong.a.chen@intel.com Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com Cc: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Cc: Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com Cc: Petr Mladek pmladek@suse.com Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Cc: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Cc: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Both patches pass my boot tests on arm64 and arm64be (I didn't test any others). So, FWIW,
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
I wasn't sure it the two patches replace or fix commit 4ef12f719802 ("kobject: Make sure the parent does not get released before its children"), so I tried to re-apply 4ef12f719802 on top of the two patches. Unfortunately that still results in crashes and UAF messages.
Yes, that kobject patch has been reverted: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...
and these 2 patches are to be used instead.
thanks.
On Sun 2020-05-24 17:30:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Sometimes it is better to unregister individual nodes instead of trying to do them all at once with software_node_unregister_nodes(), so create software_node_unregister() so that you can unregister them one at a time.
This is especially important when creating nodes in a hierarchy, with parent -> children representations. Children always need to be removed before a parent is, as the swnode logic assumes this is going to be the case.
Fix up the lib/test_printf.c fwnode_pointer() test which to use this new function as it had the problem of tearing things down in the backwards order.
Fixes: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Reported-by: kernel test robot rong.a.chen@intel.com Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com Cc: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Cc: Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com Cc: Petr Mladek pmladek@suse.com Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Cc: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Cc: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
I could confirm that this fixed lib/test_printf.c. The patch looks reasonable.
Tested-by: Petr Mladek pmladek@suse.com
Best Regards, Petr
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 05:30:40PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Sometimes it is better to unregister individual nodes instead of trying to do them all at once with software_node_unregister_nodes(), so create software_node_unregister() so that you can unregister them one at a time.
This is especially important when creating nodes in a hierarchy, with parent -> children representations. Children always need to be removed before a parent is, as the swnode logic assumes this is going to be the case.
Fix up the lib/test_printf.c fwnode_pointer() test which to use this new function as it had the problem of tearing things down in the backwards order.
Fixes: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Reported-by: kernel test robot rong.a.chen@intel.com Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com Cc: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Cc: Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com Cc: Petr Mladek pmladek@suse.com Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Cc: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Cc: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com
drivers/base/swnode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ include/linux/property.h | 1 + lib/test_printf.c | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c index de8d3543e8fe..770b1f47a625 100644 --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c @@ -712,17 +712,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register_nodes);
- @nodes: Zero terminated array of software nodes to be unregistered
- Unregister multiple software nodes at once.
- NOTE: Be careful using this call if the nodes had parent pointers set up in
- them before registering. If so, it is wiser to remove the nodes
- individually, in the correct order (child before parent) instead of relying
*/
- on the sequential order of the list of nodes in the array.
void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes) {
- struct swnode *swnode; int i;
- for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++) {
swnode = software_node_to_swnode(&nodes[i]);
if (swnode)
fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode);
- }
- for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++)
software_node_unregister(&nodes[i]);
} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister_nodes); @@ -741,6 +742,20 @@ int software_node_register(const struct software_node *node) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register); +/**
- software_node_unregister - Unregister static software node
- @node: The software node to be unregistered
- */
+void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node) +{
- struct swnode *swnode;
- swnode = software_node_to_swnode(node);
- if (swnode)
fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode);
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister);
struct fwnode_handle * fwnode_create_software_node(const struct property_entry *properties, const struct fwnode_handle *parent) diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h index d86de017c689..0d4099b4ce1f 100644 --- a/include/linux/property.h +++ b/include/linux/property.h @@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ int software_node_register_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes); void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes); int software_node_register(const struct software_node *node); +void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node); int software_node_notify(struct device *dev, unsigned long action); diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c index 6b1622f4d7c2..fc63b8959d42 100644 --- a/lib/test_printf.c +++ b/lib/test_printf.c @@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ static void __init fwnode_pointer(void) test(second_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[1])); test(third_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[2]));
- software_node_unregister_nodes(softnodes);
- software_node_unregister(&softnodes[2]);
- software_node_unregister(&softnodes[1]);
- software_node_unregister(&softnodes[0]);
} static void __init -- 2.26.2
thanks,
On 5/24/20 8:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Sometimes it is better to unregister individual nodes instead of trying to do them all at once with software_node_unregister_nodes(), so create software_node_unregister() so that you can unregister them one at a time.
This is especially important when creating nodes in a hierarchy, with parent -> children representations. Children always need to be removed before a parent is, as the swnode logic assumes this is going to be the case.
Fix up the lib/test_printf.c fwnode_pointer() test which to use this new function as it had the problem of tearing things down in the backwards order.
Fixes: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Reported-by: kernel test robot rong.a.chen@intel.com Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com Cc: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Cc: Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com Cc: Petr Mladek pmladek@suse.com Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Cc: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Cc: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Acked-by: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Tested-by: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org
thanks.
drivers/base/swnode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ include/linux/property.h | 1 + lib/test_printf.c | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c index de8d3543e8fe..770b1f47a625 100644 --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c @@ -712,17 +712,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register_nodes);
- @nodes: Zero terminated array of software nodes to be unregistered
- Unregister multiple software nodes at once.
- NOTE: Be careful using this call if the nodes had parent pointers set up in
- them before registering. If so, it is wiser to remove the nodes
- individually, in the correct order (child before parent) instead of relying
*/
- on the sequential order of the list of nodes in the array.
void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes) {
- struct swnode *swnode; int i;
- for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++) {
swnode = software_node_to_swnode(&nodes[i]);
if (swnode)
fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode);
- }
- for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++)
software_node_unregister(&nodes[i]);
} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister_nodes); @@ -741,6 +742,20 @@ int software_node_register(const struct software_node *node) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register); +/**
- software_node_unregister - Unregister static software node
- @node: The software node to be unregistered
- */
+void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node) +{
- struct swnode *swnode;
- swnode = software_node_to_swnode(node);
- if (swnode)
fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode);
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister);
struct fwnode_handle * fwnode_create_software_node(const struct property_entry *properties, const struct fwnode_handle *parent) diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h index d86de017c689..0d4099b4ce1f 100644 --- a/include/linux/property.h +++ b/include/linux/property.h @@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ int software_node_register_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes); void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes); int software_node_register(const struct software_node *node); +void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node); int software_node_notify(struct device *dev, unsigned long action); diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c index 6b1622f4d7c2..fc63b8959d42 100644 --- a/lib/test_printf.c +++ b/lib/test_printf.c @@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ static void __init fwnode_pointer(void) test(second_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[1])); test(third_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[2]));
- software_node_unregister_nodes(softnodes);
- software_node_unregister(&softnodes[2]);
- software_node_unregister(&softnodes[1]);
- software_node_unregister(&softnodes[0]);
} static void __init
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 8:31 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Sometimes it is better to unregister individual nodes instead of trying to do them all at once with software_node_unregister_nodes(), so create software_node_unregister() so that you can unregister them one at a time.
This is especially important when creating nodes in a hierarchy, with parent -> children representations. Children always need to be removed before a parent is, as the swnode logic assumes this is going to be the case.
Fix up the lib/test_printf.c fwnode_pointer() test which to use this new function as it had the problem of tearing things down in the backwards order.
Fixes: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Reported-by: kernel test robot rong.a.chen@intel.com Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com Cc: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Cc: Heikki Krogerus heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com Cc: Petr Mladek pmladek@suse.com Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Cc: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Cc: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Sorry, I was on vacation.
Seems like this has already been sufficiently reviewed and applied. Nevertheless,
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org