Further to the commit c53e9653605d (btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT) there are three fixes as below.
6f23277a49e6 btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already hold the handle 4d14c5cde5c2 btrfs: don't flush from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata f9baa501b4fd btrfs: fix deadlock when cloning inline extents and using qgroups
Commits 6f23277a49e6 and 4d14c5cde5c2 above are straightforward and are part of this series.
However, commit f9baa501b4fd above is more complicated to backport. Furthermore, the bug mentioned in the commit f9baa501b4fd might not trigger on 5.4.y as its related commit 05a5a7621ce66c ("Btrfs: implement full reflink support for inline extents") is not backported to 5.4.y.
Nikolay Borisov (2): btrfs: export and rename qgroup_reserve_meta btrfs: don't flush from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata
Qu Wenruo (1): btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already hold the handle
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/btrfs/qgroup.h | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
From: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com
commit 6f23277a49e68f8a9355385c846939ad0b1261e7 upstream
[BUG] When running the following script, btrfs will trigger an ASSERT():
#/bin/bash mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 1G" $mnt/file sync btrfs quota enable $mnt btrfs quota rescan -w $mnt
# Manually set the limit below current usage btrfs qgroup limit 512M $mnt $mnt
# Crash happens touch $mnt/file
The dmesg looks like this:
assertion failed: refcount_read(&trans->use_count) == 1, in fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2022 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3230! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction.cold+0x11/0x5d [btrfs] try_flush_qgroup+0x67/0x100 [btrfs] __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta+0x3a/0x60 [btrfs] btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0xaa/0x350 [btrfs] btrfs_update_inode+0x9d/0x110 [btrfs] btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5d/0xd0 [btrfs] touch_atime+0xb5/0x100 iterate_dir+0xf1/0x1b0 __x64_sys_getdents64+0x78/0x110 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7fb5afe588db
[CAUSE] In try_flush_qgroup(), we assume we don't hold a transaction handle at all. This is true for data reservation and mostly true for metadata. Since data space reservation always happens before we start a transaction, and for most metadata operation we reserve space in start_transaction().
But there is an exception, btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata(). It holds a transaction handle, while still trying to reserve extra metadata space.
When we hit EDQUOT inside btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata(), we will join current transaction and commit, while we still have transaction handle from qgroup code.
[FIX] Let's check current->journal before we join the transaction.
If current->journal is unset or BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB, it means we are not holding a transaction, thus are able to join and then commit transaction.
If current->journal is a valid transaction handle, we avoid committing transaction and just end it
This is less effective than committing current transaction, as it won't free metadata reserved space, but we may still free some data space before new data writes.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178634 Fixes: c53e9653605d ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com --- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 2f119adbc808..78146501c665 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -3502,6 +3502,7 @@ static int try_flush_qgroup(struct btrfs_root *root) { struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans; int ret; + bool can_commit = true;
/* * We don't want to run flush again and again, so if there is a running @@ -3513,6 +3514,20 @@ static int try_flush_qgroup(struct btrfs_root *root) return 0; }
+ /* + * If current process holds a transaction, we shouldn't flush, as we + * assume all space reservation happens before a transaction handle is + * held. + * + * But there are cases like btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata() where + * we try to reserve space with one transction handle already held. + * In that case we can't commit transaction, but at least try to end it + * and hope the started data writes can free some space. + */ + if (current->journal_info && + current->journal_info != BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB) + can_commit = false; + ret = btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot(root); if (ret < 0) goto out; @@ -3524,7 +3539,10 @@ static int try_flush_qgroup(struct btrfs_root *root) goto out; }
- ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans); + if (can_commit) + ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans); + else + ret = btrfs_end_transaction(trans); out: clear_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_QGROUP_FLUSHING, &root->state); wake_up(&root->qgroup_flush_wait);
From: Nikolay Borisov nborisov@suse.com
commit 80e9baed722c853056e0c5374f51524593cb1031 upstream
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov nborisov@suse.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com
Conflicts: fs/btrfs/qgroup.h --- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 8 ++++---- fs/btrfs/qgroup.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 78146501c665..a7344c7d3160 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -3800,8 +3800,8 @@ static int sub_root_meta_rsv(struct btrfs_root *root, int num_bytes, return num_bytes; }
-static int qgroup_reserve_meta(struct btrfs_root *root, int num_bytes, - enum btrfs_qgroup_rsv_type type, bool enforce) +int btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta(struct btrfs_root *root, int num_bytes, + enum btrfs_qgroup_rsv_type type, bool enforce) { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info; int ret; @@ -3832,14 +3832,14 @@ int __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta(struct btrfs_root *root, int num_bytes, { int ret;
- ret = qgroup_reserve_meta(root, num_bytes, type, enforce); + ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta(root, num_bytes, type, enforce); if (ret <= 0 && ret != -EDQUOT) return ret;
ret = try_flush_qgroup(root); if (ret < 0) return ret; - return qgroup_reserve_meta(root, num_bytes, type, enforce); + return btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta(root, num_bytes, type, enforce); }
void btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_all_pertrans(struct btrfs_root *root) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.h b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.h index d1f93585f217..0a2659685ad6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.h @@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(struct btrfs_inode *inode, int btrfs_qgroup_release_data(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 len); int btrfs_qgroup_free_data(struct inode *inode, struct extent_changeset *reserved, u64 start, u64 len); - +int btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta(struct btrfs_root *root, int num_bytes, + enum btrfs_qgroup_rsv_type type, bool enforce); int __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta(struct btrfs_root *root, int num_bytes, enum btrfs_qgroup_rsv_type type, bool enforce); /* Reserve metadata space for pertrans and prealloc type */
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 08:12:24PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
From: Nikolay Borisov nborisov@suse.com
commit 80e9baed722c853056e0c5374f51524593cb1031 upstream
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov nborisov@suse.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com
Conflicts: fs/btrfs/qgroup.h
What is with the conflicts lines?
I'll edit them out, but be more careful next time please...
From: Nikolay Borisov nborisov@suse.com
commit 4d14c5cde5c268a2bc26addecf09489cb953ef64 upstream
Calling btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata can result in flushing delalloc while holding a transaction and delayed node locks. This is deadlock prone. In the past multiple commits:
* ae5e070eaca9 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't try to wait flushing if we're already holding a transaction")
* 6f23277a49e6 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already hold the handle")
Tried to solve various aspects of this but this was always a whack-a-mole game. Unfortunately those 2 fixes don't solve a deadlock scenario involving btrfs_delayed_node::mutex. Namely, one thread can call btrfs_dirty_inode as a result of reading a file and modifying its atime:
PID: 6963 TASK: ffff8c7f3f94c000 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "test" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_timeout at ffffffffa52a1bdd #3 wait_for_completion at ffffffffa529eeea <-- sleeps with delayed node mutex held #4 start_delalloc_inodes at ffffffffc0380db5 #5 btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot at ffffffffc0393836 #6 try_flush_qgroup at ffffffffc03f04b2 #7 __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta at ffffffffc03f5bb6 <-- tries to reserve space and starts delalloc inodes. #8 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e31aa <-- acquires delayed node mutex #9 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 #10 btrfs_dirty_inode at ffffffffc038627b <-- TRANSACTIION OPENED #11 touch_atime at ffffffffa4cf0000 #12 generic_file_read_iter at ffffffffa4c1f123 #13 new_sync_read at ffffffffa4ccdc8a #14 vfs_read at ffffffffa4cd0849 #15 ksys_read at ffffffffa4cd0bd1 #16 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa4a052eb #17 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa540008c
This will cause an asynchronous work to flush the delalloc inodes to happen which can try to acquire the same delayed_node mutex:
PID: 455 TASK: ffff8c8085fa4000 CPU: 5 COMMAND: "kworker/u16:30" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa529e80a #3 __mutex_lock at ffffffffa529fdcb <-- goes to sleep, never wakes up. #4 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e3143 <-- tries to acquire the mutex #5 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 <-- this is the same inode that pid 6963 is holding #6 cow_file_range_inline.constprop.78 at ffffffffc0386be7 #7 cow_file_range at ffffffffc03879c1 #8 btrfs_run_delalloc_range at ffffffffc038894c #9 writepage_delalloc at ffffffffc03a3c8f #10 __extent_writepage at ffffffffc03a4c01 #11 extent_write_cache_pages at ffffffffc03a500b #12 extent_writepages at ffffffffc03a6de2 #13 do_writepages at ffffffffa4c277eb #14 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffa4c1e5bb #15 btrfs_run_delalloc_work at ffffffffc0380987 <-- starts running delayed nodes #16 normal_work_helper at ffffffffc03b706c #17 process_one_work at ffffffffa4aba4e4 #18 worker_thread at ffffffffa4aba6fd #19 kthread at ffffffffa4ac0a3d #20 ret_from_fork at ffffffffa54001ff
To fully address those cases the complete fix is to never issue any flushing while holding the transaction or the delayed node lock. This patch achieves it by calling qgroup_reserve_meta directly which will either succeed without flushing or will fail and return -EDQUOT. In the latter case that return value is going to be propagated to btrfs_dirty_inode which will fallback to start a new transaction. That's fine as the majority of time we expect the inode will have BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY flag set which will result in directly copying the in-memory state.
Fixes: c53e9653605d ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov nborisov@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com
Conflicts: fs/btrfs/inode.c --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index 7dad8794ee38..e7f8cf1531bc 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -627,7 +627,8 @@ static int btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata( */ if (!src_rsv || (!trans->bytes_reserved && src_rsv->type != BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_DELALLOC)) { - ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc(root, num_bytes, true); + ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta(root, num_bytes, + BTRFS_QGROUP_RSV_META_PREALLOC, true); if (ret < 0) return ret; ret = btrfs_block_rsv_add(root, dst_rsv, num_bytes, diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 64dd702a5448..a38dcf6ae4f9 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -6375,7 +6375,7 @@ static int btrfs_dirty_inode(struct inode *inode) return PTR_ERR(trans);
ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode); - if (ret && ret == -ENOSPC) { + if (ret && (ret == -ENOSPC || ret == -EDQUOT)) { /* whoops, lets try again with the full transaction */ btrfs_end_transaction(trans); trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1);
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 08:12:22PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Further to the commit c53e9653605d (btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT) there are three fixes as below.
6f23277a49e6 btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already hold the handle 4d14c5cde5c2 btrfs: don't flush from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata f9baa501b4fd btrfs: fix deadlock when cloning inline extents and using qgroups
Commits 6f23277a49e6 and 4d14c5cde5c2 above are straightforward and are part of this series.
However, commit f9baa501b4fd above is more complicated to backport. Furthermore, the bug mentioned in the commit f9baa501b4fd might not trigger on 5.4.y as its related commit 05a5a7621ce66c ("Btrfs: implement full reflink support for inline extents") is not backported to 5.4.y.
Queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Anand Jain -
Greg KH -
Greg KH