The patch below does not apply to the 5.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b34cb07dde7c2346dec73d053ce926aeaa087303 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phil Auld pauld@redhat.com Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 09:52:22 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() warning some more
sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more
The recent patch, fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning) did not fully resolve the issues with the rq->tmp_alone_branch != &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list warning in enqueue_task_fair. There is a case where the first for_each_sched_entity loop exits due to on_rq, having incompletely updated the list. In this case the second for_each_sched_entity loop can further modify se. The later code to fix up the list management fails to do what is needed because se does not point to the sched_entity which broke out of the first loop. The list is not fixed up because the throttled parent was already added back to the list by a task enqueue in a parallel child hierarchy.
Address this by calling list_add_leaf_cfs_rq if there are throttled parents while doing the second for_each_sched_entity loop.
Fixes: fe61468b2cb ("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning") Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Phil Auld pauld@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200512135222.GC2201@lorien.usersys.redhat.com
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 02f323b85b6d..c6d57c334d51 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5479,6 +5479,13 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) goto enqueue_throttle; + + /* + * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the + * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list. + */ + if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq)) + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); }
enqueue_throttle:
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 16:42, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
This patch applies on top of commit 6d4d22468dae ("sched/fair: Reorder enqueue/dequeue_task_fair path") commit 5ab297bab984 ("sched/fair: Fix reordering of enqueue/dequeue_task_fair()")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b34cb07dde7c2346dec73d053ce926aeaa087303 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Phil Auld pauld@redhat.com Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 09:52:22 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() warning some more
sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more
The recent patch, fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning) did not fully resolve the issues with the rq->tmp_alone_branch != &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list warning in enqueue_task_fair. There is a case where the first for_each_sched_entity loop exits due to on_rq, having incompletely updated the list. In this case the second for_each_sched_entity loop can further modify se. The later code to fix up the list management fails to do what is needed because se does not point to the sched_entity which broke out of the first loop. The list is not fixed up because the throttled parent was already added back to the list by a task enqueue in a parallel child hierarchy.
Address this by calling list_add_leaf_cfs_rq if there are throttled parents while doing the second for_each_sched_entity loop.
Fixes: fe61468b2cb ("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning") Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Phil Auld pauld@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200512135222.GC2201@lorien.usersys.redhat.com
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 02f323b85b6d..c6d57c334d51 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5479,6 +5479,13 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) goto enqueue_throttle;
/*
* One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the
* list. Add it back to not break the leaf list.
*/
if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); }
enqueue_throttle:
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 05:41:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 16:42, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
This patch applies on top of commit 6d4d22468dae ("sched/fair: Reorder enqueue/dequeue_task_fair path")
That applies, but:
commit 5ab297bab984 ("sched/fair: Fix reordering of enqueue/dequeue_task_fair()")
That one does not.
Can you make a backported patch series of these that I can apply easily?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 17:49, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 05:41:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 16:42, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
This patch applies on top of commit 6d4d22468dae ("sched/fair: Reorder enqueue/dequeue_task_fair path")
That applies, but:
commit 5ab297bab984 ("sched/fair: Fix reordering of enqueue/dequeue_task_fair()")
That one does not.
Can you make a backported patch series of these that I can apply easily?
I tested the cherry-pick of the 2 commits above on top of v5.6.14 and there were applying without error. Should I use another tag ?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 05:55:03PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 17:49, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 05:41:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 16:42, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
This patch applies on top of commit 6d4d22468dae ("sched/fair: Reorder enqueue/dequeue_task_fair path")
That applies, but:
commit 5ab297bab984 ("sched/fair: Fix reordering of enqueue/dequeue_task_fair()")
That one does not.
Can you make a backported patch series of these that I can apply easily?
I tested the cherry-pick of the 2 commits above on top of v5.6.14 and there were applying without error. Should I use another tag ?
That worked for me, I've queued it up.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org