From: Yu Kuai yukuai3@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit dfd6200a095440b663099d8d42f1efb0175a1ce3 ]
A new field 'online' is added to blkg_policy_data to fix following 2 problem:
1) In blkcg_activate_policy(), if pd_alloc_fn() with 'GFP_NOWAIT' failed, 'queue_lock' will be dropped and pd_alloc_fn() will try again without 'GFP_NOWAIT'. In the meantime, remove cgroup can race with it, and pd_offline_fn() will be called without pd_init_fn() and pd_online_fn(). This way null-ptr-deference can be triggered.
2) In order to synchronize pd_free_fn() from blkg_free_workfn() and blkcg_deactivate_policy(), 'list_del_init(&blkg->q_node)' will be delayed to blkg_free_workfn(), hence pd_offline_fn() can be called first in blkg_destroy(), and then blkcg_deactivate_policy() will call it again, we must prevent it.
The new field 'online' will be set after pd_online_fn() and will be cleared after pd_offline_fn(), in the meantime pd_offline_fn() will only be called if 'online' is set.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai yukuai3@huawei.com Acked-by: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230119110350.2287325-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Bin Lan bin.lan.cn@windriver.com Signed-off-by: He Zhe zhe.he@windriver.com --- Build test passed. --- block/blk-cgroup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- block/blk-cgroup.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c index cced5a2d5fb6..ef596fc10465 100644 --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_alloc(struct blkcg *blkcg, struct gendisk *disk, blkg->pd[i] = pd; pd->blkg = blkg; pd->plid = i; + pd->online = false; }
return blkg; @@ -326,8 +327,11 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_create(struct blkcg *blkcg, struct gendisk *disk, for (i = 0; i < BLKCG_MAX_POLS; i++) { struct blkcg_policy *pol = blkcg_policy[i];
- if (blkg->pd[i] && pol->pd_online_fn) - pol->pd_online_fn(blkg->pd[i]); + if (blkg->pd[i]) { + if (pol->pd_online_fn) + pol->pd_online_fn(blkg->pd[i]); + blkg->pd[i]->online = true; + } } } blkg->online = true; @@ -432,8 +436,11 @@ static void blkg_destroy(struct blkcg_gq *blkg) for (i = 0; i < BLKCG_MAX_POLS; i++) { struct blkcg_policy *pol = blkcg_policy[i];
- if (blkg->pd[i] && pol->pd_offline_fn) - pol->pd_offline_fn(blkg->pd[i]); + if (blkg->pd[i] && blkg->pd[i]->online) { + if (pol->pd_offline_fn) + pol->pd_offline_fn(blkg->pd[i]); + blkg->pd[i]->online = false; + } }
blkg->online = false; @@ -1422,6 +1429,7 @@ int blkcg_activate_policy(struct request_queue *q, blkg->pd[pol->plid] = pd; pd->blkg = blkg; pd->plid = pol->plid; + pd->online = false; }
/* all allocated, init in the same order */ @@ -1429,9 +1437,11 @@ int blkcg_activate_policy(struct request_queue *q, list_for_each_entry_reverse(blkg, &q->blkg_list, q_node) pol->pd_init_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]);
- if (pol->pd_online_fn) - list_for_each_entry_reverse(blkg, &q->blkg_list, q_node) + list_for_each_entry_reverse(blkg, &q->blkg_list, q_node) { + if (pol->pd_online_fn) pol->pd_online_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]); + blkg->pd[pol->plid]->online = true; + }
__set_bit(pol->plid, q->blkcg_pols); ret = 0; @@ -1493,7 +1503,7 @@ void blkcg_deactivate_policy(struct request_queue *q,
spin_lock(&blkcg->lock); if (blkg->pd[pol->plid]) { - if (pol->pd_offline_fn) + if (blkg->pd[pol->plid]->online && pol->pd_offline_fn) pol->pd_offline_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]); pol->pd_free_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]); blkg->pd[pol->plid] = NULL; diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.h b/block/blk-cgroup.h index aa2b286bc825..59815b269a20 100644 --- a/block/blk-cgroup.h +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.h @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ struct blkg_policy_data { /* the blkg and policy id this per-policy data belongs to */ struct blkcg_gq *blkg; int plid; + bool online; };
/*
From: Li Nan linan122@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 01bc4fda9ea0a6b52f12326486f07a4910666cf6 ]
In iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if 'active_list' is empty, which is intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn can be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn() is run at that time:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 Call trace: iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0 iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130 __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244 hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0
The warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being removed, the state of the 'active_list' is irrelevant, and 'waitq_timer' is canceled after removing 'active_list' in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures iocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns.
Therefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn when removing a blkcg or disk.
Signed-off-by: Li Nan linan122@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai yukuai3@huawei.com Acked-by: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419093257.3004211-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Bin Lan bin.lan.cn@windriver.com Signed-off-by: He Zhe zhe.he@windriver.com --- Build test passed. --- block/blk-iocost.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index e270e64ba342..20993d79d5cc 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -1430,8 +1430,11 @@ static void iocg_pay_debt(struct ioc_gq *iocg, u64 abs_vpay, lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->ioc->lock); lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->waitq.lock);
- /* make sure that nobody messed with @iocg */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list)); + /* + * make sure that nobody messed with @iocg. Check iocg->pd.online + * to avoid warn when removing blkcg or disk. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list) && iocg->pd.online); WARN_ON_ONCE(iocg->inuse > 1);
iocg->abs_vdebt -= min(abs_vpay, iocg->abs_vdebt);
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 01bc4fda9ea0a6b52f12326486f07a4910666cf6
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: bin.lan.cn@windriver.com Commit author: Li Nanlinan122@huawei.com
Status in newer kernel trees: 6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.13.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 1c172ac7afe4)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: 01bc4fda9ea0a ! 1: f8c69d65cdd96 blk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined @@ Metadata ## Commit message ## blk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined
+ [ Upstream commit 01bc4fda9ea0a6b52f12326486f07a4910666cf6 ] + In iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if 'active_list' is empty, which is intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn can be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn() @@ Commit message Acked-by: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419093257.3004211-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk + Signed-off-by: Bin Lan bin.lan.cn@windriver.com + Signed-off-by: He Zhe zhe.he@windriver.com
## block/blk-iocost.c ## @@ block/blk-iocost.c: static void iocg_pay_debt(struct ioc_gq *iocg, u64 abs_vpay, ---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-6.6.y | Success | Success |
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: dfd6200a095440b663099d8d42f1efb0175a1ce3
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: bin.lan.cn@windriver.com Commit author: Yu Kuaiyukuai3@huawei.com
Status in newer kernel trees: 6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.13.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.6.y | Present (exact SHA1)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: dfd6200a09544 ! 1: 4169a84a4fdda blk-cgroup: support to track if policy is online @@ Metadata ## Commit message ## blk-cgroup: support to track if policy is online
+ [ Upstream commit dfd6200a095440b663099d8d42f1efb0175a1ce3 ] + A new field 'online' is added to blkg_policy_data to fix following 2 problem:
@@ Commit message Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230119110350.2287325-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk + Signed-off-by: Bin Lan bin.lan.cn@windriver.com + Signed-off-by: He Zhe zhe.he@windriver.com
## block/blk-cgroup.c ## @@ block/blk-cgroup.c: static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_alloc(struct blkcg *blkcg, struct gendisk *disk, ---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-6.1.y | Success | Success |
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org