This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

perf report: Ensure the perf DSO mapping matches what libdw sees

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git%3Ba=su...

The filename of the patch is: perf-report-ensure-the-perf-dso-mapping-matches-what-libdw-sees.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.

From foo@baz Mon Apr 9 17:09:24 CEST 2018

From: Milian Wolff milian.wolff@kdab.com Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:37:52 +0200 Subject: perf report: Ensure the perf DSO mapping matches what libdw sees

From: Milian Wolff milian.wolff@kdab.com

[ Upstream commit 2538b9e2450ae255337c04356e9e0f8cb9ec48d9 ]

In some situations the libdw unwinder stopped working properly. I.e. with libunwind we see:

~~~~~ heaptrack_gui 2228 135073.400112: 641314 cycles: e8ed _dl_fixup (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so) 15f06 _dl_runtime_resolve_sse_vex (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so) ed94c KDynamicJobTracker::KDynamicJobTracker (/home/milian/projects/compiled/kf5/lib64/libKF5KIOWidgets.so.5.35.0) 608f3 _GLOBAL__sub_I_kdynamicjobtracker.cpp (/home/milian/projects/compiled/kf5/lib64/libKF5KIOWidgets.so.5.35.0) f199 call_init.part.0 (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so) f2a5 _dl_init (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so) db9 _dl_start_user (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so) ~~~~~

But with libdw and without this patch this sample is not properly unwound:

~~~~~ heaptrack_gui 2228 135073.400112: 641314 cycles: e8ed _dl_fixup (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so) 15f06 _dl_runtime_resolve_sse_vex (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so) ed94c KDynamicJobTracker::KDynamicJobTracker (/home/milian/projects/compiled/kf5/lib64/libKF5KIOWidgets.so.5.35.0) ~~~~~

Debug output showed me that libdw found a module for the last frame address, but it thinks it belongs to /usr/lib/ld-2.25.so. This patch double-checks what libdw sees and what perf knows. If the mappings mismatch, we now report the elf known to perf. This fixes the situation above, and the libdw unwinder produces the same stack as libunwind.

Signed-off-by: Milian Wolff milian.wolff@kdab.com Cc: Jiri Olsa jolsa@redhat.com Cc: Namhyung Kim namhyung@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170602143753.16907-1-milian.wolff@kdab.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c @@ -38,6 +38,14 @@ static int __report_module(struct addr_l return 0;

mod = dwfl_addrmodule(ui->dwfl, ip); + if (mod) { + Dwarf_Addr s; + + dwfl_module_info(mod, NULL, &s, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL); + if (s != al->map->start) + mod = 0; + } + if (!mod) mod = dwfl_report_elf(ui->dwfl, dso->short_name, dso->long_name, -1, al->map->start,

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from milian.wolff@kdab.com are

queue-4.9/perf-report-fix-off-by-one-for-non-activation-frames.patch queue-4.9/perf-report-ensure-the-perf-dso-mapping-matches-what-libdw-sees.patch