LKFT have noticed these warnings / errors when we have updated gcc version from gcc-9 to gcc-11 on stable-rc linux-5.4.y branch. I have provided the steps to reproduce in this email below.
Following perf builds failed with gcc-11 with linux-5.4.y branch. - build-arm-gcc-11-perf - build-arm64-gcc-11-perf - build-i386-gcc-11-perf - build-x86-gcc-11-perf
Build error log: -------------------- find: 'x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc/arch': No such file or directory error: Found argument '-I' which wasn't expected, or isn't valid in this context USAGE: sccache [FLAGS] [OPTIONS] [cmd]... For more information try --help error: Found argument '-I' which wasn't expected, or isn't valid in this context USAGE: sccache [FLAGS] [OPTIONS] [cmd]... For more information try --help
In function 'ready', inlined from 'sender' at bench/sched-messaging.c:87:2: bench/sched-messaging.c:73:13: error: 'dummy' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] 73 | if (write(ready_out, &dummy, 1) != 1) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from bench/sched-messaging.c:22: bench/sched-messaging.c: In function 'sender': /usr/x86_64-linux-gnu/include/unistd.h:366:16: note: by argument 2 of type 'const void *' to 'write' declared here 366 | extern ssize_t write (int __fd, const void *__buf, size_t __n) __wur; | ^~~~~ bench/sched-messaging.c:69:14: note: 'dummy' declared here 69 | char dummy; | ^~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
ref: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1vEIWryaujwVtL4wmodXkz1djUa/ https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1vEIX7NTo5OpaN9nrs2UvO74oxB/
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Steps to reproduce: --------------------------- tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch x86_64 --toolchain gcc-11 --kconfig defconfig --kconfig-add https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1vEIWryaujwVtL4wmodXkz1djUa/config headers kernel modules perf
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:40:28PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
LKFT have noticed these warnings / errors when we have updated gcc version from gcc-9 to gcc-11 on stable-rc linux-5.4.y branch. I have provided the steps to reproduce in this email below.
Following perf builds failed with gcc-11 with linux-5.4.y branch.
- build-arm-gcc-11-perf
- build-arm64-gcc-11-perf
- build-i386-gcc-11-perf
- build-x86-gcc-11-perf
Build error log:
<snip>
I imagine this is fixed in newer kernel versions, so if you could provide the git ids of the patches needed to fix this up in 5.4, that would be great!
thanks,
greg k-h
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 17:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:40:28PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
LKFT have noticed these warnings / errors when we have updated gcc version from gcc-9 to gcc-11 on stable-rc linux-5.4.y branch. I have provided the steps to reproduce in this email below.
Following perf builds failed with gcc-11 with linux-5.4.y branch.
- build-arm-gcc-11-perf
- build-arm64-gcc-11-perf
- build-i386-gcc-11-perf
- build-x86-gcc-11-perf
Build error log:
<snip>
I imagine this is fixed in newer kernel versions, so if you could provide the git ids of the patches needed to fix this up in 5.4, that would be great!
You were correct, I did a bisect [1] and found d493720581a6 ("perf bench: Fix 2 memory sanitizer warnings").
commit d2c73501a767514b6c85c7feff9457a165d51057 upstream.
Cherry picked it and I was able to build it on arm64 and x86.
Cheers, Anders [1] http://ix.io/3sS6
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:32:17PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 17:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:40:28PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
LKFT have noticed these warnings / errors when we have updated gcc version from gcc-9 to gcc-11 on stable-rc linux-5.4.y branch. I have provided the steps to reproduce in this email below.
Following perf builds failed with gcc-11 with linux-5.4.y branch.
- build-arm-gcc-11-perf
- build-arm64-gcc-11-perf
- build-i386-gcc-11-perf
- build-x86-gcc-11-perf
Build error log:
<snip>
I imagine this is fixed in newer kernel versions, so if you could provide the git ids of the patches needed to fix this up in 5.4, that would be great!
You were correct, I did a bisect [1] and found d493720581a6 ("perf bench: Fix 2 memory sanitizer warnings").
commit d2c73501a767514b6c85c7feff9457a165d51057 upstream.
Cherry picked it and I was able to build it on arm64 and x86.
Great, now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org