On Jan 5, 2023, at 6:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:

On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 04:56:31PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:

...

...

...

On Jan 4, 2023, at 12:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:16:07PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:

...

...

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:13:30AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.162 release. There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:12:47 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.162-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

Testing fails. Could you please pick these 2 up? https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221230153215.1333921-1-joel@joelfernandes.org https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221230153215.1333921-2-joel@joelfernandes.org/

That is not a regression from 5.10.161, right?

Yes it is not.

...

This release is only for the io_uring stuff to make sure that backport was done correctly.

The current "to apply" queue for the stable trees is very large right now due to everyone waiting to get tiny things into -rc1 instead of before then, so the above two are still not yet queued up, sorry.

Sure not a problem, I can resend again later if it is still not queued.

You should have already received the email notices saying they were queued :)

I happen to take messages from Skynet with a grain of salt ;-).

But thank you for the automated notification!

- Joel