From: Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com

When the session state is J1939_SESSION_DONE, j1939_tp_rxtimer() will give an alert "rx timeout, send abort", but do nothing actually. Move the alert into session active judgment condition, it is more reasonable.

One of the scenarios is that j1939_tp_rxtimer() execute followed by j1939_xtp_rx_abort_one(). After j1939_xtp_rx_abort_one(), the session state is J1939_SESSION_DONE, then j1939_tp_rxtimer() give an alert.

Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210906094219.95924-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei... Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel o.rempel@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde mkl@pengutronix.de --- net/can/j1939/transport.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c index bb5c4b8979be..bfb0718d4587 100644 --- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c +++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c @@ -1237,12 +1237,11 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart j1939_tp_rxtimer(struct hrtimer *hrtimer) session->err = -ETIME; j1939_session_deactivate(session); } else { - netdev_alert(priv->ndev, "%s: 0x%p: rx timeout, send abort\n", - __func__, session); - j1939_session_list_lock(session->priv); if (session->state >= J1939_SESSION_ACTIVE && session->state < J1939_SESSION_ACTIVE_MAX) { + netdev_alert(priv->ndev, "%s: 0x%p: rx timeout, send abort\n", + __func__, session); j1939_session_get(session); hrtimer_start(&session->rxtimer, ms_to_ktime(J1939_XTP_ABORT_TIMEOUT_MS),

base-commit: fac3cb82a54a4b7c49c932f96ef196cf5774344c