From: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
This commit recommends the patches to replace 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' with the 'blocklist' and 'allowlist', because the new suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more self-explanatory.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de --- scripts/spelling.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/spelling.txt b/scripts/spelling.txt index d9cd24cf0d40..ea785568d8b8 100644 --- a/scripts/spelling.txt +++ b/scripts/spelling.txt @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ beter||better betweeen||between bianries||binaries bitmast||bitmask +blacklist||blocklist boardcast||broadcast borad||board boundry||boundary @@ -1495,6 +1496,7 @@ whcih||which whenver||whenever wheter||whether whe||when +whitelist||allowlist wierd||weird wiil||will wirte||write
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:25:49PM +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
From: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
This commit recommends the patches to replace 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' with the 'blocklist' and 'allowlist', because the new suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more self-explanatory.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
scripts/spelling.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:56:07 +0200 Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:25:49PM +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
From: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
This commit recommends the patches to replace 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' with the 'blocklist' and 'allowlist', because the new suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more self-explanatory.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
scripts/spelling.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
Sorry, I only mistakenly Cc-ed stable@vger.kernel.org. Please don't pull this in the stable tree.
Thanks, SeongJae Park
</formletter>
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 14:25 +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
From: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
This commit recommends the patches to replace 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' with the 'blocklist' and 'allowlist', because the new suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more self-explanatory.
nack. Spelling is for typos not for politics.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
scripts/spelling.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/spelling.txt b/scripts/spelling.txt index d9cd24cf0d40..ea785568d8b8 100644 --- a/scripts/spelling.txt +++ b/scripts/spelling.txt @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ beter||better betweeen||between bianries||binaries bitmast||bitmask +blacklist||blocklist boardcast||broadcast borad||board boundry||boundary @@ -1495,6 +1496,7 @@ whcih||which whenver||whenever wheter||whether whe||when +whitelist||allowlist wierd||weird wiil||will wirte||write
On Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:35:46 -0700 Joe Perches joe@perches.com wrote:
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 14:25 +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
From: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
This commit recommends the patches to replace 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' with the 'blocklist' and 'allowlist', because the new suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more self-explanatory.
nack. Spelling is for typos not for politics.
Agreed, I'm abusing the spell checking. I personally believe the terms will eventually removed from the dictionary and become typos, though.
I will update checkpatch to support deprecated terms checking, and set the 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' as the deprecated terms in the next spin.
Thanks, SeongJae Park
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
scripts/spelling.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/spelling.txt b/scripts/spelling.txt index d9cd24cf0d40..ea785568d8b8 100644 --- a/scripts/spelling.txt +++ b/scripts/spelling.txt @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ beter||better betweeen||between bianries||binaries bitmast||bitmask +blacklist||blocklist boardcast||broadcast borad||board boundry||boundary @@ -1495,6 +1496,7 @@ whcih||which whenver||whenever wheter||whether whe||when +whitelist||allowlist wierd||weird wiil||will wirte||write
On 09. 06. 20, 14:25, SeongJae Park wrote:
From: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
This commit recommends the patches to replace 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' with the 'blocklist' and 'allowlist', because the new suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more self-explanatory.
Sorry, but no, it's definitely not.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
scripts/spelling.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/spelling.txt b/scripts/spelling.txt index d9cd24cf0d40..ea785568d8b8 100644 --- a/scripts/spelling.txt +++ b/scripts/spelling.txt @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ beter||better betweeen||between bianries||binaries bitmast||bitmask +blacklist||blocklist
Blocklist means a list of blocks here.
boardcast||broadcast borad||board boundry||boundary @@ -1495,6 +1496,7 @@ whcih||which whenver||whenever wheter||whether whe||when +whitelist||allowlist
Wut? allowlist I am seeing for the 1st time.
Some purists, linguists, and politicians are true fellows at times, or at least they think so. This comes in waves and even if they try hard, people won't adopt their nonsense. Like we, Czechs, still call piano by German Klavier, and not břinkoklapka, suggested in 19th century (among many others) by the horny extremists.
Shall we stop using black, white, blue, and other colors only because they relate to skin color of avatars now? I doubt that.
thanks,
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:50:24 +0200 Jiri Slaby jslaby@suse.cz wrote:
On 09. 06. 20, 14:25, SeongJae Park wrote:
From: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
This commit recommends the patches to replace 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' with the 'blocklist' and 'allowlist', because the new suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more self-explanatory.
Sorry, but no, it's definitely not.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sjpark@amazon.de
scripts/spelling.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/spelling.txt b/scripts/spelling.txt index d9cd24cf0d40..ea785568d8b8 100644 --- a/scripts/spelling.txt +++ b/scripts/spelling.txt @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ beter||better betweeen||between bianries||binaries bitmast||bitmask +blacklist||blocklist
Blocklist means a list of blocks here.
How about 'denylist', then?
boardcast||broadcast borad||board boundry||boundary @@ -1495,6 +1496,7 @@ whcih||which whenver||whenever wheter||whether whe||when +whitelist||allowlist
Wut? allowlist I am seeing for the 1st time.
Wouldn't it easy to infer the intention, though?
Some purists, linguists, and politicians are true fellows at times, or at least they think so. This comes in waves and even if they try hard, people won't adopt their nonsense. Like we, Czechs, still call piano by German Klavier, and not břinkoklapka, suggested in 19th century (among many others) by the horny extremists.
Shall we stop using black, white, blue, and other colors only because they relate to skin color of avatars now? I doubt that.
Well, I have no strong opinion on this, but... if some people are really being hurt by use of some terms and we could avoid spread of the term with only little cost, I believe it's worth to make the change.
Thanks, SeongJae Park
thanks,
js suse labs
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org