Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 277e4ab7d530 SUNRPC: Simplify TCP receive code by switching to using iterators.
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.0,
v4.20.0: Build failed! Errors: net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:396:24: error: ‘struct bio_vec’ has no member named ‘page’; did you mean ‘bv_page’?
How should we proceed with this patch?
-- Thanks, Sasha
Hi Sasha,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:52 PM Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 277e4ab7d530 SUNRPC: Simplify TCP receive code by switching to using iterators.
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.0,
v4.20.0: Build failed! Errors: net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:396:24: error: ‘struct bio_vec’ has no member named ‘page’; did you mean ‘bv_page’?
How should we proceed with this patch?
Please drop it, as it was superseded by v2.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 03:00:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Sasha,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:52 PM Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 277e4ab7d530 SUNRPC: Simplify TCP receive code by switching to using iterators.
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.0,
v4.20.0: Build failed! Errors: net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:396:24: error: ‘struct bio_vec’ has no member named ‘page’; did you mean ‘bv_page’?
How should we proceed with this patch?
Please drop it, as it was superseded by v2.
Hi Geert,
These mails don't really mean that the patch got queued anywhere (as it's obviously not upstream yet). It's more of a heads-up about how this patch (won't) be backported to various -stable branches.
It's usually easier to get response from people while the patch is still fresh in their heads rather than a few weeks later :)
-- Thanks, Sasha
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org