We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.
=========================================== [60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0 [60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1 [60919.266068] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x200 [60919.293289] RSP: 0018:ffff8d53bfc03cf8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [60919.307140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000001d RCX: 0000000000000007 [60919.320756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8d5104a8ed00 RDI: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.334319] RBP: ffff8d9338056800 R08: ffff8d53bfc29d80 R09: 0000000000000001 [60919.347969] R10: ffff8d53bfc03ec0 R11: ffffb8526ef47c98 R12: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.350320] perf: interrupt took too long (3063 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 65000 [60919.361148] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8d53bcf90000 R15: 0000000000000000 [60919.361151] FS: 00007fb78b6b3600(0000) GS:ffff8d53bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [60919.400812] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [60919.413730] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000003e3f784006 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [60919.426479] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [60919.439339] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [60919.451608] PKRU: 55555554 [60919.463622] Call Trace: [60919.475617] <IRQ> [60919.487122] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.498478] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.509822] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0 [60919.520709] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2a/0x40 [60919.531413] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x1b0 [60919.542178] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x38/0x1b0 [60919.552444] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x17/0x30 [60919.562477] raw_rcv+0x110/0x190 [can_raw] [60919.572539] can_rcv_filter+0xbc/0x1b0 [can] [60919.582173] can_receive+0x6b/0xb0 [can] [60919.591595] can_rcv+0x31/0x70 [can] [60919.600783] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x5a/0x80 [60919.609864] process_backlog+0x9b/0x150 [60919.618691] net_rx_action+0x156/0x400 [60919.627310] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xa0 [60919.635714] __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e9 [60919.644161] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 [60919.652154] </IRQ> [60919.659899] do_softirq.part.17+0x4f/0x60 [60919.667475] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70 [60919.675089] __dev_queue_xmit+0x539/0x920 [60919.682267] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.689218] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.695886] ? sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x211/0x230 [60919.702395] ? can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.708882] can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.715037] raw_sendmsg+0x16d/0x268 [can_raw]
It's because raw_setsockopt() concurrently with unregister_netdevice_many(). Concurrent scenario as following.
cpu0 cpu1 raw_bind raw_setsockopt unregister_netdevice_many unlist_netdevice dev_get_by_index raw_notifier raw_enable_filters ...... can_rx_register can_rcv_list_find(..., net->can.rx_alldev_list)
......
sock_close raw_release(sock_a)
......
can_receive can_rcv_filter(net->can.rx_alldev_list, ...) raw_rcv(skb, sock_a) BUG
After unlist_netdevice(), dev_get_by_index() return NULL in raw_setsockopt(). Function raw_enable_filters() will add sock and can_filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list. Then the sock is closed. Followed by, we sock_sendmsg() to a new vcan device use the same can_filter. Protocol stack match the old receiver whose sock has been released on net->can.rx_alldev_list in can_rcv_filter(). Function raw_rcv() uses the freed sock. UAF BUG is triggered.
We can find that the key issue is that net_device has not been protected in raw_setsockopt(). Use rtnl_lock to protect net_device in raw_setsockopt().
Fixes: c18ce101f2e4 ("[CAN]: Add raw protocol") Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com --- net/can/raw.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..a63e9915c66a 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, return -EFAULT; }
+ rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) @@ -588,6 +589,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock();
break;
@@ -600,6 +602,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
err_mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK;
+ rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) @@ -627,6 +630,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock();
break;
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:09:37AM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.
=========================================== [60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0 [60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1 [60919.266068] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x200 [60919.293289] RSP: 0018:ffff8d53bfc03cf8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [60919.307140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000001d RCX: 0000000000000007 [60919.320756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8d5104a8ed00 RDI: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.334319] RBP: ffff8d9338056800 R08: ffff8d53bfc29d80 R09: 0000000000000001 [60919.347969] R10: ffff8d53bfc03ec0 R11: ffffb8526ef47c98 R12: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.350320] perf: interrupt took too long (3063 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 65000 [60919.361148] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8d53bcf90000 R15: 0000000000000000 [60919.361151] FS: 00007fb78b6b3600(0000) GS:ffff8d53bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [60919.400812] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [60919.413730] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000003e3f784006 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [60919.426479] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [60919.439339] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [60919.451608] PKRU: 55555554 [60919.463622] Call Trace: [60919.475617] <IRQ> [60919.487122] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.498478] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.509822] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0 [60919.520709] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2a/0x40 [60919.531413] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x1b0 [60919.542178] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x38/0x1b0 [60919.552444] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x17/0x30 [60919.562477] raw_rcv+0x110/0x190 [can_raw] [60919.572539] can_rcv_filter+0xbc/0x1b0 [can] [60919.582173] can_receive+0x6b/0xb0 [can] [60919.591595] can_rcv+0x31/0x70 [can] [60919.600783] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x5a/0x80 [60919.609864] process_backlog+0x9b/0x150 [60919.618691] net_rx_action+0x156/0x400 [60919.627310] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xa0 [60919.635714] __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e9 [60919.644161] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 [60919.652154] </IRQ> [60919.659899] do_softirq.part.17+0x4f/0x60 [60919.667475] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70 [60919.675089] __dev_queue_xmit+0x539/0x920 [60919.682267] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.689218] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.695886] ? sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x211/0x230 [60919.702395] ? can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.708882] can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.715037] raw_sendmsg+0x16d/0x268 [can_raw]
It's because raw_setsockopt() concurrently with unregister_netdevice_many(). Concurrent scenario as following.
cpu0 cpu1 raw_bind raw_setsockopt unregister_netdevice_many unlist_netdevice dev_get_by_index raw_notifier raw_enable_filters ...... can_rx_register can_rcv_list_find(..., net->can.rx_alldev_list)
......
sock_close raw_release(sock_a)
......
can_receive can_rcv_filter(net->can.rx_alldev_list, ...) raw_rcv(skb, sock_a) BUG
After unlist_netdevice(), dev_get_by_index() return NULL in raw_setsockopt(). Function raw_enable_filters() will add sock and can_filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list. Then the sock is closed. Followed by, we sock_sendmsg() to a new vcan device use the same can_filter. Protocol stack match the old receiver whose sock has been released on net->can.rx_alldev_list in can_rcv_filter(). Function raw_rcv() uses the freed sock. UAF BUG is triggered.
We can find that the key issue is that net_device has not been protected in raw_setsockopt(). Use rtnl_lock to protect net_device in raw_setsockopt().
Fixes: c18ce101f2e4 ("[CAN]: Add raw protocol") Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
net/can/raw.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..a63e9915c66a 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, return -EFAULT; }
rtnl_lock();if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) @@ -588,6 +589,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev); release_sock(sk);
rtnl_unlock();break; @@ -600,6 +602,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, err_mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK;
rtnl_lock();if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) @@ -627,6 +630,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev); release_sock(sk);
rtnl_unlock();break; -- 2.25.1
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
On 21.07.21 06:53, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:09:37AM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.
=========================================== [60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0 [60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1
This kernel version 4.19.90 is definitely outdated.
Can you please check your issue with the latest uptream kernel as this problem should have been fixed with this patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
Thanks!
[60919.266068] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x200 [60919.293289] RSP: 0018:ffff8d53bfc03cf8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [60919.307140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000001d RCX: 0000000000000007 [60919.320756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8d5104a8ed00 RDI: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.334319] RBP: ffff8d9338056800 R08: ffff8d53bfc29d80 R09: 0000000000000001 [60919.347969] R10: ffff8d53bfc03ec0 R11: ffffb8526ef47c98 R12: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.350320] perf: interrupt took too long (3063 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 65000 [60919.361148] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8d53bcf90000 R15: 0000000000000000 [60919.361151] FS: 00007fb78b6b3600(0000) GS:ffff8d53bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [60919.400812] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [60919.413730] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000003e3f784006 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [60919.426479] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [60919.439339] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [60919.451608] PKRU: 55555554 [60919.463622] Call Trace: [60919.475617] <IRQ> [60919.487122] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.498478] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.509822] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0 [60919.520709] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2a/0x40 [60919.531413] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x1b0 [60919.542178] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x38/0x1b0 [60919.552444] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x17/0x30 [60919.562477] raw_rcv+0x110/0x190 [can_raw] [60919.572539] can_rcv_filter+0xbc/0x1b0 [can] [60919.582173] can_receive+0x6b/0xb0 [can] [60919.591595] can_rcv+0x31/0x70 [can] [60919.600783] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x5a/0x80 [60919.609864] process_backlog+0x9b/0x150 [60919.618691] net_rx_action+0x156/0x400 [60919.627310] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xa0 [60919.635714] __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e9 [60919.644161] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 [60919.652154] </IRQ> [60919.659899] do_softirq.part.17+0x4f/0x60 [60919.667475] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70 [60919.675089] __dev_queue_xmit+0x539/0x920 [60919.682267] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.689218] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.695886] ? sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x211/0x230 [60919.702395] ? can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.708882] can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.715037] raw_sendmsg+0x16d/0x268 [can_raw]
It's because raw_setsockopt() concurrently with unregister_netdevice_many(). Concurrent scenario as following.
cpu0 cpu1 raw_bind raw_setsockopt unregister_netdevice_many unlist_netdevice dev_get_by_index raw_notifier raw_enable_filters ...... can_rx_register can_rcv_list_find(..., net->can.rx_alldev_list)
......
sock_close raw_release(sock_a)
......
can_receive can_rcv_filter(net->can.rx_alldev_list, ...) raw_rcv(skb, sock_a) BUG
After unlist_netdevice(), dev_get_by_index() return NULL in raw_setsockopt(). Function raw_enable_filters() will add sock and can_filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list. Then the sock is closed. Followed by, we sock_sendmsg() to a new vcan device use the same can_filter. Protocol stack match the old receiver whose sock has been released on net->can.rx_alldev_list in can_rcv_filter(). Function raw_rcv() uses the freed sock. UAF BUG is triggered.
We can find that the key issue is that net_device has not been protected in raw_setsockopt(). Use rtnl_lock to protect net_device in raw_setsockopt().
Fixes: c18ce101f2e4 ("[CAN]: Add raw protocol") Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
net/can/raw.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..a63e9915c66a 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, return -EFAULT; }
rtnl_lock();if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) @@ -588,6 +589,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev); release_sock(sk);
rtnl_unlock();break; @@ -600,6 +602,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, err_mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK;
rtnl_lock();if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) @@ -627,6 +630,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev); release_sock(sk);
rtnl_unlock();break; -- 2.25.1
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Answering myself ...
On 21.07.21 08:35, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
On 21.07.21 06:53, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:09:37AM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.
=========================================== [60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0 [60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1
This kernel version 4.19.90 is definitely outdated.
Can you please check your issue with the latest uptream kernel as this problem should have been fixed with this patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...
("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
Thanks!
I think my hint had a wrong assumption. The suggestion to add some locking seems correct.
[60919.266068] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x200 [60919.293289] RSP: 0018:ffff8d53bfc03cf8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [60919.307140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000001d RCX: 0000000000000007 [60919.320756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8d5104a8ed00 RDI: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.334319] RBP: ffff8d9338056800 R08: ffff8d53bfc29d80 R09: 0000000000000001 [60919.347969] R10: ffff8d53bfc03ec0 R11: ffffb8526ef47c98 R12: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.350320] perf: interrupt took too long (3063 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 65000 [60919.361148] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8d53bcf90000 R15: 0000000000000000 [60919.361151] FS: 00007fb78b6b3600(0000) GS:ffff8d53bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [60919.400812] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [60919.413730] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000003e3f784006 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [60919.426479] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [60919.439339] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [60919.451608] PKRU: 55555554 [60919.463622] Call Trace: [60919.475617] <IRQ> [60919.487122] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.498478] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.509822] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0 [60919.520709] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2a/0x40 [60919.531413] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x1b0 [60919.542178] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x38/0x1b0 [60919.552444] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x17/0x30 [60919.562477] raw_rcv+0x110/0x190 [can_raw] [60919.572539] can_rcv_filter+0xbc/0x1b0 [can] [60919.582173] can_receive+0x6b/0xb0 [can] [60919.591595] can_rcv+0x31/0x70 [can] [60919.600783] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x5a/0x80 [60919.609864] process_backlog+0x9b/0x150 [60919.618691] net_rx_action+0x156/0x400 [60919.627310] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xa0 [60919.635714] __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e9 [60919.644161] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 [60919.652154] </IRQ> [60919.659899] do_softirq.part.17+0x4f/0x60 [60919.667475] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70 [60919.675089] __dev_queue_xmit+0x539/0x920 [60919.682267] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.689218] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.695886] ? sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x211/0x230 [60919.702395] ? can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.708882] can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.715037] raw_sendmsg+0x16d/0x268 [can_raw]
It's because raw_setsockopt() concurrently with unregister_netdevice_many(). Concurrent scenario as following.
cpu0 cpu1 raw_bind raw_setsockopt unregister_netdevice_many unlist_netdevice dev_get_by_index raw_notifier raw_enable_filters ...... can_rx_register can_rcv_list_find(..., net->can.rx_alldev_list)
......
sock_close raw_release(sock_a)
......
can_receive can_rcv_filter(net->can.rx_alldev_list, ...) raw_rcv(skb, sock_a) BUG
After unlist_netdevice(), dev_get_by_index() return NULL in raw_setsockopt(). Function raw_enable_filters() will add sock and can_filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list.
Btw. this should not happen too!
dev_get_by_index() is executed depending on ro->ifindex which means there should be a real network interface. When dev_get_by_index() returns NULL this can considered to be wrong.
Adding a new filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list as a consequence is wrong too.
Then the sock is closed. Followed by, we sock_sendmsg() to a new vcan device use the same can_filter. Protocol stack match the old receiver whose sock has been released on net->can.rx_alldev_list in can_rcv_filter(). Function raw_rcv() uses the freed sock. UAF BUG is triggered.
We can find that the key issue is that net_device has not been protected in raw_setsockopt(). Use rtnl_lock to protect net_device in raw_setsockopt().
Fixes: c18ce101f2e4 ("[CAN]: Add raw protocol") Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Can you please resend the below patch as suggested by Greg KH and add my
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp socketcan@hartkopp.net
as it also adds the dev_get_by_index() return check.
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..d3cbc32036c7 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -544,14 +544,18 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, } else if (count == 1) { if (copy_from_sockptr(&sfilter, optval, sizeof(sfilter))) return -EFAULT; }
+ rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) + if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); + if (!dev) + goto out_fil; + }
if (ro->bound) { /* (try to) register the new filters */ if (count == 1) err = raw_enable_filters(sock_net(sk), dev, sk, @@ -586,10 +590,11 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, out_fil: if (dev) dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock();
break;
case CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER: if (optlen != sizeof(err_mask)) @@ -598,14 +603,18 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, if (copy_from_sockptr(&err_mask, optval, optlen)) return -EFAULT;
err_mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK;
+ rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) + if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); + if (!dev) + goto out_err; + }
/* remove current error mask */ if (ro->bound) { /* (try to) register the new err_mask */ err = raw_enable_errfilter(sock_net(sk), dev, sk, @@ -625,10 +634,11 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, out_err: if (dev) dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock();
break;
case CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK: if (optlen != sizeof(ro->loopback))
Thanks for the finding!
Best regards, Oliver
(..)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
On 7/21/2021 5:24 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
Answering myself ...
On 21.07.21 08:35, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
On 21.07.21 06:53, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:09:37AM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.
=========================================== [60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0 [60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1
This kernel version 4.19.90 is definitely outdated.
Can you please check your issue with the latest uptream kernel as this problem should have been fixed with this patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
Thanks!
I think my hint had a wrong assumption. The suggestion to add some locking seems correct.
[60919.266068] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x200 [60919.293289] RSP: 0018:ffff8d53bfc03cf8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [60919.307140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000001d RCX: 0000000000000007 [60919.320756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8d5104a8ed00 RDI: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.334319] RBP: ffff8d9338056800 R08: ffff8d53bfc29d80 R09: 0000000000000001 [60919.347969] R10: ffff8d53bfc03ec0 R11: ffffb8526ef47c98 R12: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.350320] perf: interrupt took too long (3063 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 65000 [60919.361148] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8d53bcf90000 R15: 0000000000000000 [60919.361151] FS: 00007fb78b6b3600(0000) GS:ffff8d53bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [60919.400812] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [60919.413730] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000003e3f784006 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [60919.426479] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [60919.439339] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [60919.451608] PKRU: 55555554 [60919.463622] Call Trace: [60919.475617] <IRQ> [60919.487122] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.498478] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.509822] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0 [60919.520709] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2a/0x40 [60919.531413] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x1b0 [60919.542178] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x38/0x1b0 [60919.552444] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x17/0x30 [60919.562477] raw_rcv+0x110/0x190 [can_raw] [60919.572539] can_rcv_filter+0xbc/0x1b0 [can] [60919.582173] can_receive+0x6b/0xb0 [can] [60919.591595] can_rcv+0x31/0x70 [can] [60919.600783] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x5a/0x80 [60919.609864] process_backlog+0x9b/0x150 [60919.618691] net_rx_action+0x156/0x400 [60919.627310] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xa0 [60919.635714] __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e9 [60919.644161] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 [60919.652154] </IRQ> [60919.659899] do_softirq.part.17+0x4f/0x60 [60919.667475] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70 [60919.675089] __dev_queue_xmit+0x539/0x920 [60919.682267] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.689218] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.695886] ? sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x211/0x230 [60919.702395] ? can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.708882] can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.715037] raw_sendmsg+0x16d/0x268 [can_raw]
It's because raw_setsockopt() concurrently with unregister_netdevice_many(). Concurrent scenario as following.
cpu0 cpu1 raw_bind raw_setsockopt unregister_netdevice_many unlist_netdevice dev_get_by_index raw_notifier raw_enable_filters ...... can_rx_register can_rcv_list_find(..., net->can.rx_alldev_list)
......
sock_close raw_release(sock_a)
......
can_receive can_rcv_filter(net->can.rx_alldev_list, ...) raw_rcv(skb, sock_a) BUG
After unlist_netdevice(), dev_get_by_index() return NULL in raw_setsockopt(). Function raw_enable_filters() will add sock and can_filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list.
Btw. this should not happen too!
dev_get_by_index() is executed depending on ro->ifindex which means there should be a real network interface. When dev_get_by_index() returns NULL this can considered to be wrong.
Adding a new filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list as a consequence is wrong too.
Then the sock is closed. Followed by, we sock_sendmsg() to a new vcan device use the same can_filter. Protocol stack match the old receiver whose sock has been released on net->can.rx_alldev_list in can_rcv_filter(). Function raw_rcv() uses the freed sock. UAF BUG is triggered.
We can find that the key issue is that net_device has not been protected in raw_setsockopt(). Use rtnl_lock to protect net_device in raw_setsockopt().
Fixes: c18ce101f2e4 ("[CAN]: Add raw protocol") Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Can you please resend the below patch as suggested by Greg KH and add my
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp socketcan@hartkopp.net
as it also adds the dev_get_by_index() return check.
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..d3cbc32036c7 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -544,14 +544,18 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, } else if (count == 1) { if (copy_from_sockptr(&sfilter, optval, sizeof(sfilter))) return -EFAULT; }
+ rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) + if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); + if (!dev) + goto out_fil; + }
At first, I also use this modification. After discussion with my partner, we found that it is impossible scenario if we use rtnl_lock to protect net_device object. We can see two sequences: 1. raw_setsockopt first get rtnl_lock, unregister_netdevice_many later. It can be simplified to add the filter in raw_setsockopt, then remove the filter in raw_notify.
2. unregister_netdevice_many first get rtnl_lock, raw_setsockopt later. raw_notify will set ro->ifindex, ro->bound and ro->count to zero firstly. The filter will not be added to any filter_list in raw_notify.
So I selected the current modification. Do you think so?
My first modification as following:
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..a0ce4908317f 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -546,10 +546,16 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, return -EFAULT; }
+ rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) + if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); + if (!dev) { + err = -ENODEV; + goto out_fil; + } + }
if (ro->bound) { /* (try to) register the new filters */ @@ -559,11 +565,8 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, else err = raw_enable_filters(sock_net(sk), dev, sk, filter, count); - if (err) { - if (count > 1) - kfree(filter); + if (err) goto out_fil; - }
/* remove old filter registrations */ raw_disable_filters(sock_net(sk), dev, sk, ro->filter, @@ -584,10 +587,14 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, ro->count = count;
out_fil: + if (err && count > 1) + kfree(filter); + if (dev) dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock();
break;
@@ -600,10 +607,16 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
err_mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK;
+ rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) + if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); + if (!dev) { + err = -ENODEV; + goto out_err; + } + }
/* remove current error mask */ if (ro->bound) { @@ -627,6 +640,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock();
break;
if (ro->bound) { /* (try to) register the new filters */ if (count == 1) err = raw_enable_filters(sock_net(sk), dev, sk, @@ -586,10 +590,11 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, out_fil: if (dev) dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock();
break;
case CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER: if (optlen != sizeof(err_mask)) @@ -598,14 +603,18 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, if (copy_from_sockptr(&err_mask, optval, optlen)) return -EFAULT;
err_mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK;
+ rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) + if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); + if (!dev) + goto out_err; + }
/* remove current error mask */ if (ro->bound) { /* (try to) register the new err_mask */ err = raw_enable_errfilter(sock_net(sk), dev, sk, @@ -625,10 +634,11 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, out_err: if (dev) dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock();
break;
case CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK: if (optlen != sizeof(ro->loopback))
Thanks for the finding!
Best regards, Oliver
(..)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
.
On 21.07.21 13:37, Ziyang Xuan (William) wrote:
On 7/21/2021 5:24 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
Can you please resend the below patch as suggested by Greg KH and add my
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp socketcan@hartkopp.net
as it also adds the dev_get_by_index() return check.
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..d3cbc32036c7 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -544,14 +544,18 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, } else if (count == 1) { if (copy_from_sockptr(&sfilter, optval, sizeof(sfilter))) return -EFAULT; }
+ rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) + if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); + if (!dev) + goto out_fil; + }
At first, I also use this modification. After discussion with my partner, we found that it is impossible scenario if we use rtnl_lock to protect net_device object. We can see two sequences:
- raw_setsockopt first get rtnl_lock, unregister_netdevice_many later.
It can be simplified to add the filter in raw_setsockopt, then remove the filter in raw_notify.
- unregister_netdevice_many first get rtnl_lock, raw_setsockopt later.
raw_notify will set ro->ifindex, ro->bound and ro->count to zero firstly. The filter will not be added to any filter_list in raw_notify.
So I selected the current modification. Do you think so?
My first modification as following:
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..a0ce4908317f 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -546,10 +546,16 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, return -EFAULT; }
rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex)
if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);if (!dev) {err = -ENODEV;goto out_fil;}} if (ro->bound) { /* (try to) register the new filters */@@ -559,11 +565,8 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, else err = raw_enable_filters(sock_net(sk), dev, sk, filter, count);
if (err) {if (count > 1)kfree(filter);
if (err) goto out_fil;
} /* remove old filter registrations */ raw_disable_filters(sock_net(sk), dev, sk, ro->filter,@@ -584,10 +587,14 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, ro->count = count;
out_fil:
if (err && count > 1)kfree(filter);
Setting the err variable to -ENODEV is a good idea but I do not like the movement of kfree(filter).
The kfree() has a tight relation inside the if-statement for ro->bound which makes it easier to understand.
Regards, Oliver
ps. your patches have less context than mine. Do you have different settings for -U<n>, --unified=<n> for 'git diff' ?
if (dev) dev_put(dev); release_sock(sk);
rtnl_unlock(); break;@@ -600,10 +607,16 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
err_mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK;
rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk);
if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex)
if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);if (!dev) {err = -ENODEV;goto out_err;}} /* remove current error mask */ if (ro->bound) {@@ -627,6 +640,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk);
rtnl_unlock(); break;
On 7/21/2021 2:35 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
On 21.07.21 06:53, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:09:37AM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.
=========================================== [60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0 [60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1
This kernel version 4.19.90 is definitely outdated.
Can you please check your issue with the latest uptream kernel as this problem should have been fixed with this patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
Thanks!
I have tested it under the latest 5.14-rc2 kernel version which includes commit 8d0caedb7596 before I submit the patch. Although I failed to get the vmcore-dmesg file after updating the kernel version to 5.14-rc2 to display here. But we can get the conclusion according to the following debug messages and my problem analysis.
========================================== [ 1048.953574] unlist_netdevice name[vcan0] [ 1048.953661] raw_notify 283: enter, waiting [ 1050.950967] raw_setsockopt 552: ro->bound[1] ro->ifindex[8] sk[ffff9420c5699800] [ 1053.956002] can: receive list entry not found for dev any, id 000, mask 000 [ 1053.961989] can: receive list entry not found for dev vcan0, id 123, mask 7FF
raw_setsockopt() executes after unlist_netdevice() and before raw_notify(). The problem always exists.
[60919.266068] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x200 [60919.293289] RSP: 0018:ffff8d53bfc03cf8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [60919.307140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000001d RCX: 0000000000000007 [60919.320756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8d5104a8ed00 RDI: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.334319] RBP: ffff8d9338056800 R08: ffff8d53bfc29d80 R09: 0000000000000001 [60919.347969] R10: ffff8d53bfc03ec0 R11: ffffb8526ef47c98 R12: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.350320] perf: interrupt took too long (3063 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 65000 [60919.361148] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8d53bcf90000 R15: 0000000000000000 [60919.361151] FS: 00007fb78b6b3600(0000) GS:ffff8d53bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [60919.400812] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [60919.413730] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000003e3f784006 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [60919.426479] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [60919.439339] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [60919.451608] PKRU: 55555554 [60919.463622] Call Trace: [60919.475617] <IRQ> [60919.487122] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.498478] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.509822] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0 [60919.520709] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2a/0x40 [60919.531413] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x1b0 [60919.542178] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x38/0x1b0 [60919.552444] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x17/0x30 [60919.562477] raw_rcv+0x110/0x190 [can_raw] [60919.572539] can_rcv_filter+0xbc/0x1b0 [can] [60919.582173] can_receive+0x6b/0xb0 [can] [60919.591595] can_rcv+0x31/0x70 [can] [60919.600783] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x5a/0x80 [60919.609864] process_backlog+0x9b/0x150 [60919.618691] net_rx_action+0x156/0x400 [60919.627310] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xa0 [60919.635714] __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e9 [60919.644161] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 [60919.652154] </IRQ> [60919.659899] do_softirq.part.17+0x4f/0x60 [60919.667475] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70 [60919.675089] __dev_queue_xmit+0x539/0x920 [60919.682267] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.689218] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.695886] ? sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x211/0x230 [60919.702395] ? can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.708882] can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.715037] raw_sendmsg+0x16d/0x268 [can_raw]
It's because raw_setsockopt() concurrently with unregister_netdevice_many(). Concurrent scenario as following.
cpu0 cpu1 raw_bind raw_setsockopt unregister_netdevice_many unlist_netdevice dev_get_by_index raw_notifier raw_enable_filters ...... can_rx_register can_rcv_list_find(..., net->can.rx_alldev_list)
......
sock_close raw_release(sock_a)
......
can_receive can_rcv_filter(net->can.rx_alldev_list, ...) raw_rcv(skb, sock_a) BUG
After unlist_netdevice(), dev_get_by_index() return NULL in raw_setsockopt(). Function raw_enable_filters() will add sock and can_filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list. Then the sock is closed. Followed by, we sock_sendmsg() to a new vcan device use the same can_filter. Protocol stack match the old receiver whose sock has been released on net->can.rx_alldev_list in can_rcv_filter(). Function raw_rcv() uses the freed sock. UAF BUG is triggered.
We can find that the key issue is that net_device has not been protected in raw_setsockopt(). Use rtnl_lock to protect net_device in raw_setsockopt().
Fixes: c18ce101f2e4 ("[CAN]: Add raw protocol") Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
net/can/raw.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..a63e9915c66a 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, return -EFAULT; } + rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk); if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) @@ -588,6 +589,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev); release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock(); break; @@ -600,6 +602,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, err_mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK; + rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk); if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) @@ -627,6 +630,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev); release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock(); break; -- 2.25.1
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
.
On 21.07.21 11:29, Ziyang Xuan (William) wrote:
On 7/21/2021 2:35 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
On 21.07.21 06:53, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:09:37AM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.
=========================================== [60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0 [60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1
This kernel version 4.19.90 is definitely outdated.
Can you please check your issue with the latest uptream kernel as this problem should have been fixed with this patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
Thanks!
I have tested it under the latest 5.14-rc2 kernel version which includes commit 8d0caedb7596 before I submit the patch. Although I failed to get the vmcore-dmesg file after updating the kernel version to 5.14-rc2 to display here. But we can get the conclusion according to the following debug messages and my problem analysis.
========================================== [ 1048.953574] unlist_netdevice name[vcan0] [ 1048.953661] raw_notify 283: enter, waiting [ 1050.950967] raw_setsockopt 552: ro->bound[1] ro->ifindex[8] sk[ffff9420c5699800] [ 1053.956002] can: receive list entry not found for dev any, id 000, mask 000 [ 1053.961989] can: receive list entry not found for dev vcan0, id 123, mask 7FF
raw_setsockopt() executes after unlist_netdevice() and before raw_notify(). The problem always exists.
You are right!
In the meantime I sent a new reply to your original patch here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/11822417-5931-b2d8-ae77-ec4a84b8b895@hartk...
Thanks!
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg KH -
Oliver Hartkopp -
Ziyang Xuan -
Ziyang Xuan (William)