Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8.5, v5.4.61, v4.19.142, v4.14.195, v4.9.234, v4.4.234.
v5.8.5: Build OK! v5.4.61: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 898310032b96 ("fat: improve the readahead for FAT entries") a090a5a7d73f ("fat: fix fat_ra_init() for data clusters == 0")
v4.19.142: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 898310032b96 ("fat: improve the readahead for FAT entries") a090a5a7d73f ("fat: fix fat_ra_init() for data clusters == 0")
v4.14.195: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 898310032b96 ("fat: improve the readahead for FAT entries") a090a5a7d73f ("fat: fix fat_ra_init() for data clusters == 0") f663b5b38fff ("fat: add FITRIM ioctl for FAT file system")
v4.9.234: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 898310032b96 ("fat: improve the readahead for FAT entries") a090a5a7d73f ("fat: fix fat_ra_init() for data clusters == 0") f663b5b38fff ("fat: add FITRIM ioctl for FAT file system")
v4.4.234: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 898310032b96 ("fat: improve the readahead for FAT entries") 8992de4cec12 ("fat: constify fatent_operations structures") a090a5a7d73f ("fat: fix fat_ra_init() for data clusters == 0") f663b5b38fff ("fat: add FITRIM ioctl for FAT file system")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org writes:
Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8.5, v5.4.61, v4.19.142, v4.14.195, v4.9.234, v4.4.234.
v5.8.5: Build OK!
[...]
How should we proceed with this patch?
Only 5.8.x has to apply this patch.
Thanks.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org