With numa balancing on, when a numa system is running where a numa node doesn't have its local memory so it has no managed zones, the following oops has been observed. It's because wakeup_kswapd() is called with a wrong zone index, -1. Fixed it by checking the index before calling wakeup_kswapd().
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000033f3 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 895 Comm: masim Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #255 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:wakeup_kswapd (./linux/mm/vmscan.c:7812) Code: (omitted) RSP: 0000:ffffc90004257d58 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff88883fff0480 RCX: 0000000000000003 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88883fff0480 RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ff0003ffffffffff R09: ffffffffffffffff R10: ffff888106c95540 R11: 0000000055555554 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88883fff0940 FS: 00007fc4b8124740(0000) GS:ffff888827c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000033f3 CR3: 000000026cc08004 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:
<TASK> ? __die ? page_fault_oops ? __pte_offset_map_lock ? exc_page_fault ? asm_exc_page_fault ? wakeup_kswapd migrate_misplaced_page __handle_mm_fault handle_mm_fault do_user_addr_fault exc_page_fault asm_exc_page_fault RIP: 0033:0x55b897ba0808 Code: (omitted) RSP: 002b:00007ffeefa821a0 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 000055b89983acd0 RBX: 00007ffeefa823f8 RCX: 000055b89983acd0 RDX: 00007fc2f8122010 RSI: 0000000000020000 RDI: 000055b89983acd0 RBP: 00007ffeefa821a0 R08: 0000000000000037 R09: 0000000000000075 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffeefa82410 R14: 000055b897ba5dd8 R15: 00007fc4b8340000 </TASK>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com Reported-by: Hyeongtak Ji hyeongtak.ji@sk.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c574bbe917036 ("NUMA balancing: optimize page placement for memory tiering system") --- mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fbc8586ed735..51ee6865b0f6 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -2825,6 +2825,14 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_folio(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct folio *folio) if (managed_zone(pgdat->node_zones + z)) break; } + + /* + * If there are no managed zones, it should not proceed + * further. + */ + if (z < 0) + return 0; + wakeup_kswapd(pgdat->node_zones + z, 0, folio_order(folio), ZONE_MOVABLE); return 0;
On 2024/2/16 19:15, Byungchul Park wrote:
With numa balancing on, when a numa system is running where a numa node doesn't have its local memory so it has no managed zones, the following oops has been observed. It's because wakeup_kswapd() is called with a wrong zone index, -1. Fixed it by checking the index before calling wakeup_kswapd().
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000033f3 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 895 Comm: masim Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #255 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:wakeup_kswapd (./linux/mm/vmscan.c:7812) Code: (omitted) RSP: 0000:ffffc90004257d58 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff88883fff0480 RCX: 0000000000000003 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88883fff0480 RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ff0003ffffffffff R09: ffffffffffffffff R10: ffff888106c95540 R11: 0000000055555554 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88883fff0940 FS: 00007fc4b8124740(0000) GS:ffff888827c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000033f3 CR3: 000000026cc08004 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:
<TASK> ? __die ? page_fault_oops ? __pte_offset_map_lock ? exc_page_fault ? asm_exc_page_fault ? wakeup_kswapd migrate_misplaced_page __handle_mm_fault handle_mm_fault do_user_addr_fault exc_page_fault asm_exc_page_fault RIP: 0033:0x55b897ba0808 Code: (omitted) RSP: 002b:00007ffeefa821a0 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 000055b89983acd0 RBX: 00007ffeefa823f8 RCX: 000055b89983acd0 RDX: 00007fc2f8122010 RSI: 0000000000020000 RDI: 000055b89983acd0 RBP: 00007ffeefa821a0 R08: 0000000000000037 R09: 0000000000000075 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffeefa82410 R14: 000055b897ba5dd8 R15: 00007fc4b8340000 </TASK>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com Reported-by: Hyeongtak Ji hyeongtak.ji@sk.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c574bbe917036 ("NUMA balancing: optimize page placement for memory tiering system")
This means that there is no memory on the target node？ if so, we can add a check at the beginning to avoid calling unnecessary migrate_misplaced_folio().
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index e95503d7544e..a64a1aac463f 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -5182,7 +5182,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) else last_cpupid = folio_last_cpupid(folio); target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(folio, vma, vmf->address, nid, &flags); - if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) { + if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_state(target_nid, N_MEMORY)) { folio_put(folio); goto out_map; }
(similar changes for do_huge_pmd_numa_page())
mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fbc8586ed735..51ee6865b0f6 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -2825,6 +2825,14 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_folio(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct folio *folio) if (managed_zone(pgdat->node_zones + z)) break; }
/** If there are no managed zones, it should not proceed* further.*/if (z < 0)return 0;- wakeup_kswapd(pgdat->node_zones + z, 0, folio_order(folio), ZONE_MOVABLE); return 0;
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 02:25:11PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
On 2024/2/16 19:15, Byungchul Park wrote:
With numa balancing on, when a numa system is running where a numa node doesn't have its local memory so it has no managed zones, the following oops has been observed. It's because wakeup_kswapd() is called with a wrong zone index, -1. Fixed it by checking the index before calling wakeup_kswapd().
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000033f3 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 895 Comm: masim Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #255 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:wakeup_kswapd (./linux/mm/vmscan.c:7812) Code: (omitted) RSP: 0000:ffffc90004257d58 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff88883fff0480 RCX: 0000000000000003 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88883fff0480 RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ff0003ffffffffff R09: ffffffffffffffff R10: ffff888106c95540 R11: 0000000055555554 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88883fff0940 FS: 00007fc4b8124740(0000) GS:ffff888827c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000033f3 CR3: 000000026cc08004 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:
<TASK> ? __die ? page_fault_oops ? __pte_offset_map_lock ? exc_page_fault ? asm_exc_page_fault ? wakeup_kswapd migrate_misplaced_page __handle_mm_fault handle_mm_fault do_user_addr_fault exc_page_fault asm_exc_page_fault RIP: 0033:0x55b897ba0808 Code: (omitted) RSP: 002b:00007ffeefa821a0 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 000055b89983acd0 RBX: 00007ffeefa823f8 RCX: 000055b89983acd0 RDX: 00007fc2f8122010 RSI: 0000000000020000 RDI: 000055b89983acd0 RBP: 00007ffeefa821a0 R08: 0000000000000037 R09: 0000000000000075 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffeefa82410 R14: 000055b897ba5dd8 R15: 00007fc4b8340000 </TASK>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com Reported-by: Hyeongtak Ji hyeongtak.ji@sk.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c574bbe917036 ("NUMA balancing: optimize page placement for memory tiering system")
This means that there is no memory on the target node？ if so, we can add a check at the beginning to avoid calling unnecessary migrate_misplaced_folio().
Right. However, the check is necessary no matter where it comes from. FYI, the fix is going on in another thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240216114045.24828-1-byungchul@sk.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240219041920.1183-1-byungchul@sk.com/
Byungchul
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index e95503d7544e..a64a1aac463f 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -5182,7 +5182,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) else last_cpupid = folio_last_cpupid(folio); target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(folio, vma, vmf->address, nid, &flags);
if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_state(target_nid, N_MEMORY)){ folio_put(folio); goto out_map; }
(similar changes for do_huge_pmd_numa_page())
mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fbc8586ed735..51ee6865b0f6 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -2825,6 +2825,14 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_folio(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct folio *folio) if (managed_zone(pgdat->node_zones + z)) break; }
/** If there are no managed zones, it should not proceed* further.*/if (z < 0)return 0;- wakeup_kswapd(pgdat->node_zones + z, 0, folio_order(folio), ZONE_MOVABLE); return 0;
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 02:25:11PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
This means that there is no memory on the target node？ if so, we can add a check at the beginning to avoid calling unnecessary migrate_misplaced_folio().
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index e95503d7544e..a64a1aac463f 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -5182,7 +5182,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) else last_cpupid = folio_last_cpupid(folio); target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(folio, vma, vmf->address, nid, &flags);
if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_state(target_nid, N_MEMORY)){ folio_put(folio); goto out_map; }
(similar changes for do_huge_pmd_numa_page())
With the check in place from [1], numa_migrate_prep() will also return NUMA_NO_NODE, so no need for this one here.
And I did not check, but I assume that do_huge_pmd_numa_page() also ends up calling numa_migrate_prep().
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240219041920.1183-1-byungchul@sk.com/
On 2024/2/19 16:11, Oscar Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 02:25:11PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
This means that there is no memory on the target node？ if so, we can add a check at the beginning to avoid calling unnecessary migrate_misplaced_folio().
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index e95503d7544e..a64a1aac463f 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -5182,7 +5182,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) else last_cpupid = folio_last_cpupid(folio); target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(folio, vma, vmf->address, nid, &flags);
if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_state(target_nid, N_MEMORY)){ folio_put(folio); goto out_map; }
(similar changes for do_huge_pmd_numa_page())
With the check in place from [1], numa_migrate_prep() will also return NUMA_NO_NODE, so no need for this one here.
And I did not check, but I assume that do_huge_pmd_numa_page() also ends up calling numa_migrate_prep().
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240219041920.1183-1-byungchul@sk.com/
Right. I missed this patch before. So with checking in should_numa_migrate_memory(), I guess current changes in numamigrate_isolate_folio() can also be dropped, it will never hit a memoryless node after the patch [1], no?
Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com writes:
With numa balancing on, when a numa system is running where a numa node doesn't have its local memory so it has no managed zones, the following oops has been observed. It's because wakeup_kswapd() is called with a wrong zone index, -1. Fixed it by checking the index before calling wakeup_kswapd().
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000033f3 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 895 Comm: masim Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #255 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:wakeup_kswapd (./linux/mm/vmscan.c:7812) Code: (omitted) RSP: 0000:ffffc90004257d58 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff88883fff0480 RCX: 0000000000000003 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88883fff0480 RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ff0003ffffffffff R09: ffffffffffffffff R10: ffff888106c95540 R11: 0000000055555554 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88883fff0940 FS: 00007fc4b8124740(0000) GS:ffff888827c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000033f3 CR3: 000000026cc08004 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:
<TASK> ? __die ? page_fault_oops ? __pte_offset_map_lock ? exc_page_fault ? asm_exc_page_fault ? wakeup_kswapd migrate_misplaced_page __handle_mm_fault handle_mm_fault do_user_addr_fault exc_page_fault asm_exc_page_fault RIP: 0033:0x55b897ba0808 Code: (omitted) RSP: 002b:00007ffeefa821a0 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 000055b89983acd0 RBX: 00007ffeefa823f8 RCX: 000055b89983acd0 RDX: 00007fc2f8122010 RSI: 0000000000020000 RDI: 000055b89983acd0 RBP: 00007ffeefa821a0 R08: 0000000000000037 R09: 0000000000000075 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffeefa82410 R14: 000055b897ba5dd8 R15: 00007fc4b8340000 </TASK>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com Reported-by: Hyeongtak Ji hyeongtak.ji@sk.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c574bbe917036 ("NUMA balancing: optimize page placement for memory tiering system")
mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fbc8586ed735..51ee6865b0f6 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -2825,6 +2825,14 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_folio(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct folio *folio) if (managed_zone(pgdat->node_zones + z)) break; }
/** If there are no managed zones, it should not proceed* further.*/if (z < 0)return 0;
I think that it's better to check pgdat->nr_zones directly earlier in the function. That is a little easier to be understood.
wakeup_kswapd(pgdat->node_zones + z, 0, folio_order(folio), ZONE_MOVABLE); return 0;
-- Best Regards, Huang, Ying
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:42:31AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com writes:
With numa balancing on, when a numa system is running where a numa node doesn't have its local memory so it has no managed zones, the following oops has been observed. It's because wakeup_kswapd() is called with a wrong zone index, -1. Fixed it by checking the index before calling wakeup_kswapd().
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000033f3 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 895 Comm: masim Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #255 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:wakeup_kswapd (./linux/mm/vmscan.c:7812) Code: (omitted) RSP: 0000:ffffc90004257d58 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff88883fff0480 RCX: 0000000000000003 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88883fff0480 RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ff0003ffffffffff R09: ffffffffffffffff R10: ffff888106c95540 R11: 0000000055555554 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88883fff0940 FS: 00007fc4b8124740(0000) GS:ffff888827c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000033f3 CR3: 000000026cc08004 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:
<TASK> ? __die ? page_fault_oops ? __pte_offset_map_lock ? exc_page_fault ? asm_exc_page_fault ? wakeup_kswapd migrate_misplaced_page __handle_mm_fault handle_mm_fault do_user_addr_fault exc_page_fault asm_exc_page_fault RIP: 0033:0x55b897ba0808 Code: (omitted) RSP: 002b:00007ffeefa821a0 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 000055b89983acd0 RBX: 00007ffeefa823f8 RCX: 000055b89983acd0 RDX: 00007fc2f8122010 RSI: 0000000000020000 RDI: 000055b89983acd0 RBP: 00007ffeefa821a0 R08: 0000000000000037 R09: 0000000000000075 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffeefa82410 R14: 000055b897ba5dd8 R15: 00007fc4b8340000 </TASK>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com Reported-by: Hyeongtak Ji hyeongtak.ji@sk.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c574bbe917036 ("NUMA balancing: optimize page placement for memory tiering system")
mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fbc8586ed735..51ee6865b0f6 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -2825,6 +2825,14 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_folio(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct folio *folio) if (managed_zone(pgdat->node_zones + z)) break; }
/** If there are no managed zones, it should not proceed* further.*/if (z < 0)return 0;I think that it's better to check pgdat->nr_zones directly earlier in the function. That is a little easier to be understood.
No. No matter what the value of ->nr_zones is, the oops is going to happen if there are no managed zones by any reason.
Byungchul
wakeup_kswapd(pgdat->node_zones + z, 0, folio_order(folio), ZONE_MOVABLE); return 0;-- Best Regards, Huang, Ying
Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:42:31AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com writes:
With numa balancing on, when a numa system is running where a numa node doesn't have its local memory so it has no managed zones, the following oops has been observed. It's because wakeup_kswapd() is called with a wrong zone index, -1. Fixed it by checking the index before calling wakeup_kswapd().
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000033f3 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 895 Comm: masim Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #255 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:wakeup_kswapd (./linux/mm/vmscan.c:7812) Code: (omitted) RSP: 0000:ffffc90004257d58 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff88883fff0480 RCX: 0000000000000003 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88883fff0480 RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ff0003ffffffffff R09: ffffffffffffffff R10: ffff888106c95540 R11: 0000000055555554 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88883fff0940 FS: 00007fc4b8124740(0000) GS:ffff888827c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000033f3 CR3: 000000026cc08004 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:
<TASK> ? __die ? page_fault_oops ? __pte_offset_map_lock ? exc_page_fault ? asm_exc_page_fault ? wakeup_kswapd migrate_misplaced_page __handle_mm_fault handle_mm_fault do_user_addr_fault exc_page_fault asm_exc_page_fault RIP: 0033:0x55b897ba0808 Code: (omitted) RSP: 002b:00007ffeefa821a0 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 000055b89983acd0 RBX: 00007ffeefa823f8 RCX: 000055b89983acd0 RDX: 00007fc2f8122010 RSI: 0000000000020000 RDI: 000055b89983acd0 RBP: 00007ffeefa821a0 R08: 0000000000000037 R09: 0000000000000075 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffeefa82410 R14: 000055b897ba5dd8 R15: 00007fc4b8340000 </TASK>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park byungchul@sk.com Reported-by: Hyeongtak Ji hyeongtak.ji@sk.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c574bbe917036 ("NUMA balancing: optimize page placement for memory tiering system")
mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fbc8586ed735..51ee6865b0f6 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -2825,6 +2825,14 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_folio(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct folio *folio) if (managed_zone(pgdat->node_zones + z)) break; }
/** If there are no managed zones, it should not proceed* further.*/if (z < 0)return 0;I think that it's better to check pgdat->nr_zones directly earlier in the function. That is a little easier to be understood.
No. No matter what the value of ->nr_zones is, the oops is going to happen if there are no managed zones by any reason.
Yes. You are right. Sorry for noise.
-- Best Regards, Huang, Ying
Byungchul
wakeup_kswapd(pgdat->node_zones + z, 0, folio_order(folio), ZONE_MOVABLE); return 0;-- Best Regards, Huang, Ying
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Baolin Wang -
Byungchul Park -
Huang, Ying -
Oscar Salvador