The driver generates following warning when regulator support isn't enabled in the kernel. Fix it.
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c: In function 's3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target':
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:55:22: warning: variable 'old_freq' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
55 | unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; | ^~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:54:30: warning: variable 'dvfs' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
54 | struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs; | ^~~~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501191803.CtfT7b2o-lkp@intel.com/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+ Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org --- V2: Move s3c64xx_dvfs_table too inside ifdef.
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c index c6bdfc308e99..9cef71528076 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct s3c64xx_dvfs { unsigned int vddarm_max; };
+#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR static struct s3c64xx_dvfs s3c64xx_dvfs_table[] = { [0] = { 1000000, 1150000 }, [1] = { 1050000, 1150000 }, @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ static struct s3c64xx_dvfs s3c64xx_dvfs_table[] = { [3] = { 1200000, 1350000 }, [4] = { 1300000, 1350000 }, }; +#endif
static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c64xx_freq_table[] = { { 0, 0, 66000 }, @@ -51,15 +53,16 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c64xx_freq_table[] = { static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { - struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs; - unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; + unsigned int new_freq = s3c64xx_freq_table[index].frequency; int ret;
+#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR + struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs; + unsigned int old_freq; + old_freq = clk_get_rate(policy->clk) / 1000; - new_freq = s3c64xx_freq_table[index].frequency; dvfs = &s3c64xx_dvfs_table[s3c64xx_freq_table[index].driver_data];
-#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR if (vddarm && new_freq > old_freq) { ret = regulator_set_voltage(vddarm, dvfs->vddarm_min,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 7:06 AM Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
The driver generates following warning when regulator support isn't enabled in the kernel. Fix it.
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c: In function 's3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target':
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:55:22: warning: variable 'old_freq' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
55 | unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; | ^~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:54:30: warning: variable 'dvfs' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
54 | struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs; | ^~~~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501191803.CtfT7b2o-lkp@intel.com/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+ Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
V2: Move s3c64xx_dvfs_table too inside ifdef.
Applied as 6.14-rc material.
If you'd rather apply it yourself, please let me know and I'll drop it.
Thanks!
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c index c6bdfc308e99..9cef71528076 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct s3c64xx_dvfs { unsigned int vddarm_max; };
+#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR static struct s3c64xx_dvfs s3c64xx_dvfs_table[] = { [0] = { 1000000, 1150000 }, [1] = { 1050000, 1150000 }, @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ static struct s3c64xx_dvfs s3c64xx_dvfs_table[] = { [3] = { 1200000, 1350000 }, [4] = { 1300000, 1350000 }, }; +#endif
static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c64xx_freq_table[] = { { 0, 0, 66000 }, @@ -51,15 +53,16 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c64xx_freq_table[] = { static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) {
struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs;
unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
unsigned int new_freq = s3c64xx_freq_table[index].frequency; int ret;
+#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs;
unsigned int old_freq;
old_freq = clk_get_rate(policy->clk) / 1000;
new_freq = s3c64xx_freq_table[index].frequency; dvfs = &s3c64xx_dvfs_table[s3c64xx_freq_table[index].driver_data];
-#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR if (vddarm && new_freq > old_freq) { ret = regulator_set_voltage(vddarm, dvfs->vddarm_min, -- 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514
On 23-01-25, 20:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 7:06 AM Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
The driver generates following warning when regulator support isn't enabled in the kernel. Fix it.
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c: In function 's3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target':
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:55:22: warning: variable 'old_freq' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
55 | unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; | ^~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:54:30: warning: variable 'dvfs' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
54 | struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs; | ^~~~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501191803.CtfT7b2o-lkp@intel.com/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+ Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
V2: Move s3c64xx_dvfs_table too inside ifdef.
Applied as 6.14-rc material.
Thanks.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org