From: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net

commit c751798aa224fadc5124b49eeb38fb468c0fa039 upstream.

syzkaller managed to trigger the warning in bpf_jit_free() which checks via bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off() for potentially unlinked JITed BPF progs in kallsyms, and subsequently trips over GPF when walking kallsyms entries:

[...] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device batadv0 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device batadv0 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9869 at kernel/bpf/core.c:810 bpf_jit_free+0x1e8/0x2a0 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 9869 Comm: kworker/0:7 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #1 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x113/0x167 lib/dump_stack.c:113 panic+0x212/0x40b kernel/panic.c:214 __warn.cold.8+0x1b/0x38 kernel/panic.c:571 report_bug+0x1a4/0x200 lib/bug.c:186 fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 [inline] do_error_trap+0x11b/0x200 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:271 do_invalid_op+0x36/0x40 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:290 invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:973 RIP: 0010:bpf_jit_free+0x1e8/0x2a0 Code: 02 4c 89 e2 83 e2 07 38 d0 7f 08 84 c0 0f 85 86 00 00 00 48 ba 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 0f b6 43 02 49 39 d6 0f 84 5f fe ff ff <0f> 0b e9 58 fe ff ff 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 e2 48 c1 RSP: 0018:ffff888092f67cd8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000007 RBX: ffffc90001947000 RCX: ffffffff816e9d88 RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88808769f7f0 RBP: ffff888092f67d00 R08: fffffbfff1394059 R09: fffffbfff1394058 R10: fffffbfff1394058 R11: ffffffff89ca02c7 R12: ffffc90001947002 R13: ffffc90001947020 R14: ffffffff881eca80 R15: ffff88808769f7e8 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffbfff400d000 #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] PGD 21ffee067 P4D 21ffee067 PUD 21ffed067 PMD 9f942067 PTE 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 9869 Comm: kworker/0:7 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #1 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred RIP: 0010:bpf_get_prog_addr_region kernel/bpf/core.c:495 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_tree_comp kernel/bpf/core.c:558 [inline] RIP: 0010:__lt_find include/linux/rbtree_latch.h:115 [inline] RIP: 0010:latch_tree_find include/linux/rbtree_latch.h:208 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_kallsyms_find+0x107/0x2e0 kernel/bpf/core.c:632 Code: 00 f0 ff ff 44 38 c8 7f 08 84 c0 0f 85 fa 00 00 00 41 f6 45 02 01 75 02 0f 0b 48 39 da 0f 82 92 00 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 30 84 c0 74 08 3c 03 0f 8e 45 01 00 00 8b 03 48 c1 e0 [...]

Upon further debugging, it turns out that whenever we trigger this issue, the kallsyms removal in bpf_prog_ksym_node_del() was /skipped/ but yet bpf_jit_free() reported that the entry is /in use/.

Problem is that symbol exposure via bpf_prog_kallsyms_add() but also perf_event_bpf_event() were done /after/ bpf_prog_new_fd(). Once the fd is exposed to the public, a parallel close request came in right before we attempted to do the bpf_prog_kallsyms_add().

Given at this time the prog reference count is one, we start to rip everything underneath us via bpf_prog_release() -> bpf_prog_put(). The memory is eventually released via deferred free, so we're seeing that bpf_jit_free() has a kallsym entry because we added it from bpf_prog_load() but /after/ bpf_prog_put() from the remote CPU.

Therefore, move both notifications /before/ we install the fd. The issue was never seen between bpf_prog_alloc_id() and bpf_prog_new_fd() because upon bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id() we'll take another reference to the BPF prog, so we're still holding the original reference from the bpf_prog_load().

Fixes: 6ee52e2a3fe4 ("perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT") Fixes: 74451e66d516 ("bpf: make jited programs visible in traces") Reported-by: syzbot+bd3bba6ff3fcea7a6ec6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Cc: Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com Signed-off-by: Zubin Mithra zsm@chromium.org --- Notes: * Syzkaller triggered a WARNING on 4.14 kernels with the following stacktrace: Call Trace: dump_stack+0x81/0xb3 panic+0x14a/0x2ad ? refcount_error_report+0xf6/0xf6 ? set_fs+0x1a/0x29 ? bpf_jit_free+0x8b/0xce __warn+0xde/0x112 ? bpf_jit_free+0x8b/0xce report_bug+0x91/0xda fixup_bug+0x2c/0x4c do_error_trap+0xda/0x192 ? fixup_bug+0x4c/0x4c ? hlock_class+0x6d/0x8b ? mark_lock+0x3a/0x26d ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0xf2/0xfb ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c invalid_op+0x1b/0x40 ? bpf_jit_binary_free+0x15/0x20 ? bpf_jit_free+0x7b/0xce process_one_work+0x484/0x793 ? wq_calc_node_cpumask.constprop.37+0x25/0x25 ? worker_clr_flags+0x52/0x88 worker_thread+0x2b8/0x3d1 ? rescuer_thread+0x425/0x425 kthread+0x192/0x1a2 ? __list_del_entry+0x41/0x41 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

* The commit is not present in linux-4.19.y. A backport has been sent separately.

* The patch resolves conflicts inside bpf_prog_load that arise due to trace_bpf_prog_load() not being present upstream when c751798aa224 was applied and perf_event_bpf_event() not being present in linux-4.14.y.

* Tests run: Chrome OS tryjobs, Syzkaller reproducer

kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 2d828d3469822..59d2e94ecb798 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -1067,20 +1067,26 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr) if (err) goto free_used_maps;

- err = bpf_prog_new_fd(prog); - if (err < 0) { - /* failed to allocate fd. - * bpf_prog_put() is needed because the above - * bpf_prog_alloc_id() has published the prog - * to the userspace and the userspace may - * have refcnt-ed it through BPF_PROG_GET_FD_BY_ID. - */ - bpf_prog_put(prog); - return err; - } - + /* Upon success of bpf_prog_alloc_id(), the BPF prog is + * effectively publicly exposed. However, retrieving via + * bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id() will take another reference, + * therefore it cannot be gone underneath us. + * + * Only for the time /after/ successful bpf_prog_new_fd() + * and before returning to userspace, we might just hold + * one reference and any parallel close on that fd could + * rip everything out. Hence, below notifications must + * happen before bpf_prog_new_fd(). + * + * Also, any failure handling from this point onwards must + * be using bpf_prog_put() given the program is exposed. + */ bpf_prog_kallsyms_add(prog); trace_bpf_prog_load(prog, err); + + err = bpf_prog_new_fd(prog); + if (err < 0) + bpf_prog_put(prog); return err;

free_used_maps: