Thanks Sasha, for picking these fixes up. I have reviewed all the queues and everything looks good.
Just for completeness sake, I have fixed the conflict in v5.4, so it can also get the flower patch.
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen (2): net: qede: sanitize 'rc' in qede_add_tc_flower_fltr() net: qede: use return from qede_parse_flow_attr() for flower
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[ Upstream commit e25714466abd9d96901b15efddf82c60a38abd86 ]
Explicitly set 'rc' (return code), before jumping to the unlock and return path.
By not having any code depend on that 'rc' remains at it's initial value of -EINVAL, then we can re-use 'rc' for the return code of function calls in subsequent patches.
Only compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen ast@fiberby.net Reviewed-by: Simon Horman horms@kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Stable-dep-of: fcee2065a178 ("net: qede: use return from qede_parse_flow_attr() for flower") [ resolved conflict in v5.4, no extack for qede_parse_actions() yet ] Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen ast@fiberby.net --- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c index 5041994bf03f..69d9b4a32c56 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c @@ -1949,8 +1949,8 @@ int qede_add_tc_flower_fltr(struct qede_dev *edev, __be16 proto, struct flow_cls_offload *f) { struct qede_arfs_fltr_node *n; - int min_hlen, rc = -EINVAL; struct qede_arfs_tuple t; + int min_hlen, rc;
__qede_lock(edev);
@@ -1960,8 +1960,10 @@ int qede_add_tc_flower_fltr(struct qede_dev *edev, __be16 proto, }
/* parse flower attribute and prepare filter */ - if (qede_parse_flow_attr(edev, proto, f->rule, &t)) + if (qede_parse_flow_attr(edev, proto, f->rule, &t)) { + rc = -EINVAL; goto unlock; + }
/* Validate profile mode and number of filters */ if ((edev->arfs->filter_count && edev->arfs->mode != t.mode) || @@ -1969,12 +1971,15 @@ int qede_add_tc_flower_fltr(struct qede_dev *edev, __be16 proto, DP_NOTICE(edev, "Filter configuration invalidated, filter mode=0x%x, configured mode=0x%x, filter count=0x%x\n", t.mode, edev->arfs->mode, edev->arfs->filter_count); + rc = -EINVAL; goto unlock; }
/* parse tc actions and get the vf_id */ - if (qede_parse_actions(edev, &f->rule->action)) + if (qede_parse_actions(edev, &f->rule->action)) { + rc = -EINVAL; goto unlock; + }
if (qede_flow_find_fltr(edev, &t)) { rc = -EEXIST;
[ Upstream commit fcee2065a178f78be6fd516302830378b17dba3d ]
In qede_add_tc_flower_fltr(), when calling qede_parse_flow_attr() then the return code was only used for a non-zero check, and then -EINVAL was returned.
qede_parse_flow_attr() can currently fail with: * -EINVAL * -EOPNOTSUPP * -EPROTONOSUPPORT
This patch changes the code to use the actual return code, not just return -EINVAL.
The blaimed commit introduced these functions.
Only compile tested.
Fixes: 2ce9c93eaca6 ("qede: Ingress tc flower offload (drop action) support.") Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen ast@fiberby.net Reviewed-by: Simon Horman horms@kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net --- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c index 69d9b4a32c56..304bdc92bab4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c @@ -1960,10 +1960,9 @@ int qede_add_tc_flower_fltr(struct qede_dev *edev, __be16 proto, }
/* parse flower attribute and prepare filter */ - if (qede_parse_flow_attr(edev, proto, f->rule, &t)) { - rc = -EINVAL; + rc = qede_parse_flow_attr(edev, proto, f->rule, &t); + if (rc) goto unlock; - }
/* Validate profile mode and number of filters */ if ((edev->arfs->filter_count && edev->arfs->mode != t.mode) ||
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:24:21PM +0000, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
Thanks Sasha, for picking these fixes up. I have reviewed all the queues and everything looks good.
Just for completeness sake, I have fixed the conflict in v5.4, so it can also get the flower patch.
Queued up, thanks!
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org