From: Mitchell Levy levymitchell0@gmail.com

When computing which xfeatures are available, make sure that LBR is only present if both LBR is supported in general, as well as by XSAVES.

There are two distinct CPU features related to the use of XSAVES as it applies to LBR: whether LBR is itself supported (strictly speaking, I'm not sure that this is necessary to check though it's certainly a good sanity check), and whether XSAVES supports LBR (see sections 13.2 and 13.5.12 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual, Volume 1). Currently, the LBR subsystem correctly checks both (see intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init), however the xstate initialization subsystem does not.

When calculating what value to place in the IA32_XSS MSR, xfeatures_mask_independent only checks whether LBR support is present, not whether XSAVES supports LBR. If XSAVES does not support LBR, this write causes #GP, leaving the state of IA32_XSS unchanged (i.e., set to zero, as its not written with other values, and its default value is zero out of RESET per section 13.3 of the arch manual).

Then, the next time XRSTORS is used to restore supervisor state, it will fail with #GP (because the RFBM has zero for all supervisor features, which does not match the XCOMP_BV field). In particular, XFEATURE_MASK_FPSTATE includes supervisor features, so setting up the FPU will cause a #GP. This results in a call to fpu_reset_from_exception_fixup, which by the same process results in another #GP. Eventually this causes the kernel to run out of stack space and #DF.

Fixes: f0dccc9da4c0 ("x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de

Signed-off-by: Mitchell Levy levymitchell0@gmail.com --- Changes in v3: - Use a proper Suggested-by: (thanks tglx) - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240809-xsave-lbr-fix-v2-1-04296b387380@gmail.com

Changes in v2: - Corrected Fixes tag (thanks tglx) - Properly check for XSAVES support of LBR (thanks tglx) - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240808-xsave-lbr-fix-v1-1-a223806c83e7@gmail.com --- arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h | 7 +++++++ arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 3 +++ arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h index eb17f31b06d2..de16862bf230 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h @@ -591,6 +591,13 @@ struct fpu_state_config { * even without XSAVE support, i.e. legacy features FP + SSE */ u64 legacy_features; + /* + * @independent_features: + * + * Features that are supported by XSAVES, but not managed as part of + * the FPU core, such as LBR + */ + u64 independent_features; };

/* FPU state configuration information */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c index c5a026fee5e0..1339f8328db5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c @@ -788,6 +788,9 @@ void __init fpu__init_system_xstate(unsigned int legacy_size) goto out_disable; }

+ fpu_kernel_cfg.independent_features = fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features & + XFEATURE_MASK_INDEPENDENT; + /* * Clear XSAVE features that are disabled in the normal CPUID. */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.h b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.h index 2ee0b9c53dcc..afb404cd2059 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.h +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.h @@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ static inline u64 xfeatures_mask_supervisor(void) static inline u64 xfeatures_mask_independent(void) { if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR)) - return XFEATURE_MASK_INDEPENDENT & ~XFEATURE_MASK_LBR; + return fpu_kernel_cfg.independent_features & ~XFEATURE_MASK_LBR;

- return XFEATURE_MASK_INDEPENDENT; + return fpu_kernel_cfg.independent_features; }

/* XSAVE/XRSTOR wrapper functions */

--- base-commit: de9c2c66ad8e787abec7c9d7eff4f8c3cdd28aed change-id: 20240807-xsave-lbr-fix-02d52f641653

Best regards,