this seems to break build of 5.10.y (and maybe earlier) for me:
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh - due to target missing CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh - due to target missing CHK include/generated/compile.h AS arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o - due to target missing arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: unexpected characters following instruction at operand 2 -- `mov x1,#((1U<<31)|(1<<23))' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile:28: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o' failed make[5]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o] Error 1 scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe' failed make[4]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe] Error 2 scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm/hyp' failed make[3]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp] Error 2 scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm' failed make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm] Error 2 Makefile:1822: recipe for target 'arch/arm64' failed make[1]: *** [arch/arm64] Error 2 Makefile:336: recipe for target '__build_one_by_one' failed make: *** [__build_one_by_one] Error 2
Looking at the problematic line 87 of hyp-init.S shows that there is a macro expansion:
mov x1, #TCR_EL2_RES1
This macro was modified by the $subject patch (commit c71b5f37b5ff1a673b2e4a91d1b34ea027546e23 in v5.10.y) and reverting the patch makes the compile succeed.
Now: why does it build for me for v5.15.y and v5.16-rc5? I think it is because my build system switches to gcc 6.3 instead of gcc 4.9 depending on scripts/min-tool-version.sh.
So I assume that the fix is not compatible with the minimum requirement for 5.10.y of gcc 4.9 (or even less - I don't know exactly). Earlier kernels may also be affected if $subject patch was also backported there, but I have not tested.
This should somehow be fixed so that arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h can be included by older assemblers.
BR and thanks, Nikolaus Schaller
Hi Catalin,
Am 15.12.2021 um 19:40 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com:
this seems to break build of 5.10.y (and maybe earlier) for me:
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh - due to target missing CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh - due to target missing CHK include/generated/compile.h AS arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o - due to target missing arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: unexpected characters following instruction at operand 2 -- `mov x1,#((1U<<31)|(1<<23))' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile:28: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o' failed make[5]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o] Error 1 scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe' failed make[4]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe] Error 2 scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm/hyp' failed make[3]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp] Error 2 scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm' failed make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm] Error 2 Makefile:1822: recipe for target 'arch/arm64' failed make[1]: *** [arch/arm64] Error 2 Makefile:336: recipe for target '__build_one_by_one' failed make: *** [__build_one_by_one] Error 2
Looking at the problematic line 87 of hyp-init.S shows that there is a macro expansion:
mov x1, #TCR_EL2_RES1
This macro was modified by the $subject patch (commit c71b5f37b5ff1a673b2e4a91d1b34ea027546e23 in v5.10.y) and reverting the patch makes the compile succeed.
Now: why does it build for me for v5.15.y and v5.16-rc5? I think it is because my build system switches to gcc 6.3 instead of gcc 4.9 depending on scripts/min-tool-version.sh.
I have run the cross-check and it - fails with gcc 4.9.2 + binutils 2.25 (compatible to jessie) - works with gcc 6.3.0 + binutils 2.28.1 (compatible to stretch)
So I assume that the fix is not compatible with the minimum requirement for 5.10.y of gcc 4.9 (or even less - I don't know exactly). Earlier kernels may also be affected if $subject patch was also backported there, but I have not tested.
This should somehow be fixed so that arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h can be included by older assemblers.
BR and thanks, Nikolaus Schaller
Hi Nikolaus,
On 2021-12-16 06:58, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Hi Catalin,
Am 15.12.2021 um 19:40 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com:
this seems to break build of 5.10.y (and maybe earlier) for me:
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh - due to target missing CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh - due to target missing CHK include/generated/compile.h AS arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o - due to target missing arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: unexpected characters following instruction at operand 2 -- `mov x1,#((1U<<31)|(1<<23))' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile:28: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o' failed make[5]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o] Error 1 scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe' failed make[4]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe] Error 2 scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm/hyp' failed make[3]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm/hyp] Error 2 scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kvm' failed make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/kvm] Error 2 Makefile:1822: recipe for target 'arch/arm64' failed make[1]: *** [arch/arm64] Error 2 Makefile:336: recipe for target '__build_one_by_one' failed make: *** [__build_one_by_one] Error 2
Looking at the problematic line 87 of hyp-init.S shows that there is a macro expansion:
mov x1, #TCR_EL2_RES1
This macro was modified by the $subject patch (commit c71b5f37b5ff1a673b2e4a91d1b34ea027546e23 in v5.10.y) and reverting the patch makes the compile succeed.
Now: why does it build for me for v5.15.y and v5.16-rc5? I think it is because my build system switches to gcc 6.3 instead of gcc 4.9 depending on scripts/min-tool-version.sh.
I have run the cross-check and it
- fails with gcc 4.9.2 + binutils 2.25 (compatible to jessie)
- works with gcc 6.3.0 + binutils 2.28.1 (compatible to stretch)
So I assume that the fix is not compatible with the minimum requirement for 5.10.y of gcc 4.9 (or even less - I don't know exactly). Earlier kernels may also be affected if $subject patch was also backported there, but I have not tested.
This should somehow be fixed so that arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h can be included by older assemblers.
GCC versions prior to 5.1 are known to miscompile the kernel, and the minimal GCC version was bumped in dca5244d2f5b.
I am surprised this requirement wasn't backported to 5.10-stable, as this results in all sorts of terrible bugs that are hard to diagnose (see the horror story in the commit message).
As for the issue you describe, does the following help?
Thanks,
M.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h index 01d47c5886dc..d03087308ab5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ #define HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_TGE | HCR_E2H)
/* TCR_EL2 Registers bits */ -#define TCR_EL2_RES1 ((1U << 31) | (1 << 23)) +#define TCR_EL2_RES1 ((UL(1) << 31) | (UL(1) << 23)) #define TCR_EL2_TBI (1 << 20) #define TCR_EL2_PS_SHIFT 16 #define TCR_EL2_PS_MASK (7 << TCR_EL2_PS_SHIFT)
Hi Marc,
Am 16.12.2021 um 09:43 schrieb Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org:
Hi Nikolaus,
On 2021-12-16 06:58, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Hi Catalin,
Am 15.12.2021 um 19:40 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com: this seems to break build of 5.10.y (and maybe earlier) for me: CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh - due to target missing CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh - due to target missing CHK include/generated/compile.h AS arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o - due to target missing arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')'This should somehow be fixed so that arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h can be included by older assemblers.
GCC versions prior to 5.1 are known to miscompile the kernel, and the minimal GCC version was bumped in dca5244d2f5b.
I am surprised this requirement wasn't backported to 5.10-stable, as this results in all sorts of terrible bugs that are hard to diagnose (see the horror story in the commit message).
Indeed.
My build system checks for existence of scripts/min-tool-version.sh and if it exists it chooses the right gcc version. If it does not exist it assumes that gcc 4.9 is still good enough...
As for the issue you describe, does the following help?
Thanks,
M.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h index 01d47c5886dc..d03087308ab5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ #define HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_TGE | HCR_E2H)
/* TCR_EL2 Registers bits */ -#define TCR_EL2_RES1 ((1U << 31) | (1 << 23)) +#define TCR_EL2_RES1 ((UL(1) << 31) | (UL(1) << 23)) #define TCR_EL2_TBI (1 << 20) #define TCR_EL2_PS_SHIFT 16 #define TCR_EL2_PS_MASK (7 << TCR_EL2_PS_SHIFT)
-- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Yes, it does! This can be compiled with gcc 4.9 (resp. binutils).
So IMHO there are 3 different ways to solve it: a) your fix applied to 5.10.y b) someone backports scripts/min-tool-version.sh to allow for dependable automation... c) we leave 5.10.y unfixed and I just add a special rule for arm64 to choose a newer gcc (it is no problem to use 4.9 for other architectures) in my build setup.
BR and thanks, Nikolaus
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 03:30:40PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 16.12.2021 um 09:43 schrieb Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org: On 2021-12-16 06:58, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 15.12.2021 um 19:40 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com: this seems to break build of 5.10.y (and maybe earlier) for me: CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh - due to target missing CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh - due to target missing CHK include/generated/compile.h AS arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.nvhe.o - due to target missing arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S: Assembler messages: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')' arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:87: Error: missing ')'This should somehow be fixed so that arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h can be included by older assemblers.
GCC versions prior to 5.1 are known to miscompile the kernel, and the minimal GCC version was bumped in dca5244d2f5b.
I am surprised this requirement wasn't backported to 5.10-stable, as this results in all sorts of terrible bugs that are hard to diagnose (see the horror story in the commit message).
Indeed.
My build system checks for existence of scripts/min-tool-version.sh and if it exists it chooses the right gcc version. If it does not exist it assumes that gcc 4.9 is still good enough...
I wonder whether the problem is binutils rather than gcc. We have a minimum requirement of 2.23 but it looks like it failed to build for you with 2.25. Unless the compiler got smarter and it drops the 'U' from 1U when passing it to gas.
Yes, it does! This can be compiled with gcc 4.9 (resp. binutils).
So IMHO there are 3 different ways to solve it: a) your fix applied to 5.10.y b) someone backports scripts/min-tool-version.sh to allow for dependable automation... c) we leave 5.10.y unfixed and I just add a special rule for arm64 to choose a newer gcc (it is no problem to use 4.9 for other architectures) in my build setup.
Another option is to merge Marc's fix in 5.16 (there are two more 1U in the same file) with a Fixes tag and cc stable so that it gets backported to 5.10.y.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org